< 18 November 20 November >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Independent People's Party (Ghana). (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kofi Percival Akpaloo[edit]

Kofi Percival Akpaloo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable leader of a political party that has never had any elected members of any institution Domdeparis (talk) 23:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tha Inq[edit]

Tha Inq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unqle Chriz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Does not meet WP:MUSBIO criteria Domdeparis (talk) 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was PROCEDURAL CLOSE, speedy deleted as an attack page. (non-admin closure) CrowCaw 22:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hoido[edit]

Hoido (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ATTACK and completely unsourced Meatsgains (talk) 22:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Krissia Beatty[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Krissia Beatty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Beatty is only really notable for being Miss Utah, and this is not enough to establish notability. The coverage up until she won Miss Utah is all local coverage from St. George and southern Utah. The Deseret News article on her win makes about as much mention of other contestants. I did find an article from Today.com about her being at one point diagnosed as never being able to walk, but even if that is a reliable source (I don't know) it is not enough to suggest notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the problem is "just not enough", the evidence from WP:BEFORE D1 is missing.  And given the assertion that this is a WP:SINGLEEVENT, where is the analysis of the WP:ATD?  Unscintillating (talk) 12:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Beatty received a celebratory send-off in St. George Aug. 22...in the Gardner Center Ballroom on the DSU campus."
"The first Miss Utah ever from Southern Utah..."
Unscintillating (talk) 12:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Either address the source analysis or provide suitable replacement, reliable sources czar 02:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 02:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is Krissia Beatty a corporation subject to WP:AUD?  The answer is "no".  Who is "we"?  The answer is that this "We" is not editors making policy-based arguments.  Unscintillating (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • In researching the excellent workmanship in this article, I see that the nominator has not posted a notice of this AfD on the article creator's page.  Further, the AfD notice itself has no edit comment, diff.  Unscintillating (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did the sources become dead links after the nomination?  Otherwise, why were they not marked as dead links at the time of the nomination?  Unscintillating (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The nomination says that it doesn't know if [1] from today.com is a reliable source.  A Wikipedia search for "today.com" shows that the term is a redirect to Today (U.S. TV program), which says:

Today (stylized as TODAY), also called The Today Show, is an American news and talk morning television show that airs on NBC. The program debuted on January 14, 1952. It was the first of its genre on American television and in the world, and is the fifth-longest-running American television series. Originally a two-hour program on weekdays, it expanded to Sundays (a one-hour program) in 1987 and Saturdays (running for two hours) in 1992. The weekday broadcast expanded to three hours in 2000, and to four hours in 2007.

Unscintillating (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Kausar, Nur (July 21, 2011). "It's in the family - Five women in family named Miss Washington County". The Spectrum. St. George, UT: Gannett. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  2. "There is Something for Everyone at the Washington County Fair". The Independent. St. George, UT: Independent Publishing Company. August 7, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2015.[dead link]
  3. Lundeberg, Justi (June 27, 2012). "Krissia Beatty, Miss Washington County Finalist in Miss Utah Pageant". Cedar City, UT: KCSG. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  4. Jensen, Kaitlen (October 26, 2012). "Miss Dixie Crown Passed To Krissia Beatty". Dixie Sun News. St. George, UT: Dixie State University. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  5. Hicken, Jackie (June 23, 2013). "Ciera Pekarcik crowned Miss Utah 2013 at Capitol Theatre Saturday". Deseret News. Salt Lake City, UT: Deseret Management Corporation. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  6. "Miss Nebo Krissia Beatty crowned as Miss Utah 2015 Saturday". Deseret News. Salt Lake City, UT: Deseret Management Corporation. June 20, 2015. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  7. Benedict, Patrick (June 21, 2015). "Krissia Beatty, Miss Nebo Crowned New Miss Utah 2015". Gephardt Daily. Salt Lake City, UT. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  8. "Miss Nebo Krissia Beatty crowned Miss Utah 2015". Daily Herald. Provo, UT: Lee Enterprises. June 21, 2015. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  9. Allred, Cathy (June 21, 2015). "Utah County contestants dominate Miss Utah Scholarship Pageant 2015". Daily Herald. Provo, UT: Lee Enterprises. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  10. "Miss Nebo Krissia Beatty crowned Miss Utah". Salt Lake City, UT: KSL-TV. Associated Press. June 21, 2015. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  11. "DSU student Krissia Beatty crowned Miss Utah". The Spectrum. St. George, UT: Gannett. June 21, 2015. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  12. "Miss Nebo Krissia Beatty crowned Miss Utah". The Washington Times. Washington, D.C. Associated Press. June 21, 2015. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
For 8 out of 12 of these articles, the words "Krissia Beatty" are part of the title of the article.
Unscintillating (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where does it say that that we ignore Utah sources in WP:GNG?  Answer: it doesn't.  Unscintillating (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • If WP:N notability were really the issue, a resolution could come with mini-bios that don't require notability.  When the solution is said to be WP:DEL8, the claiming of lack of notability ignores WP:ATD, so is not policy-based reasoning.  Unscintillating (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then why the "delete" in bold, when you've made an argument to merge?  If you read the paragraph just above, it says, "If WP:N notability were really the issue, a resolution could come with mini-bios that don't require notability.  When the solution is said to be WP:DEL8, the claiming of lack of notability ignores WP:ATD, so is not policy-based reasoning."  Unscintillating (talk) 17:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Icreon Tech[edit]

Icreon Tech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear and blatant company advertising since all of this is either company-focused or so are the listed sources, with those also either being firsthand PR or second republishing of it, I unsurprisingly found only PR advertising and PR interviews and a heavy focus of it, at that, therefore it shows the company is passionately capable of advertising itself, Wikipedia should of course not be involved with it or encourage it. The history itself shows the repeated attempts of removing advertising, only for advertising-only accounts to come and replace it, therefore it shows there's no actual benefits here or that we should mistake anything of it, when it's clear advertising. SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Although several participants argue for salting, I don't yet see a pattern of repeated re-creation making this necessary. Randykitty (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bahwan CyberTek[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Bahwan CyberTek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unbelievably kept in 2012 but, then, again, the comments were naturally of "The major newspapers are enough" or "This is enough for significance", but we all know that's not the case now, not only because of the mass advertising, but because of the sheer fact we cannot confide in these publications to not publish such advertising, everything else is literally all advertising, either firsthand or secondhand. At best, not only considering this, but the fact a past deletion was for G12, Delete and Salt would be best, given that past experiences show this will only be restarted and we'll be back at AfD once again, with another or the same advertising user (in the case of this article advertising-only accounts are obvious). SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination has no WP:DEL-REASON, includes no wikilinks, and could have been speedy closed as having no argument for deletion.  Arguments to change WP:NOT belong at WT:NOT, and a WP:RANT violates WP:SOAPBOX. 

    Here is the applicable policy text for WP:NOTDIR:

Wikipedia is not a directory
Shortcuts
See also: MOS:LISTS, WP:Stand-alone lists, and WP:Embedded lists

Wikipedia encompasses many lists of links to articles within Wikipedia that are used for internal organization or to describe a notable subject. In that sense, Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content. However, Wikipedia is not a directory of everything in the universe that exists or has existed. Please see Wikipedia:Alternative outlets for alternatives. Wikipedia articles are not:

  1. Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as (but not limited to) quotations, aphorisms, or persons (real or fictional). If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote. Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are relevant because they are associated with or significantly contribute to the list topic. Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference. Merged groups of small articles based on a core topic are permitted. (See Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Appropriate topics for lists for clarification.)
  2. Genealogical entries. Family histories should be presented only where appropriate to support the reader's understanding of a notable topic.
  3. The White or Yellow Pages. Contact information such as phone numbers, fax numbers and e-mail addresses is not encyclopedic. Likewise, disambiguation pages (such as John Smith) are not intended to be complete listings of every person in the world named John Smith—just the notable ones.
  4. Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable. Likewise an article on a business should not contain a list of all the company's patent filings. Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article.
  5. Sales catalogues. An article should not include product pricing or availability information unless there is an independent source and a justified reason for the mention. Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention. Prices and product availability can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices and availability of a single product from different vendors or retailers.
  6. Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories like these are not considered sufficient basis to create an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon. See also Wikipedia:Overcategorization for this issue in categories.
  7. Simple listings without context information. Examples include, but are not limited to: listings of business alliances, clients, competitors, employees (except CEOs, supervisory directors and similar top functionaries), equipment, estates, offices, products and services, sponsors, subdivisions and tourist attractions. Information about relevant single entries with encyclopedic information should be added as sourced prose. Lists of creative works in a wider context are permitted.
Unscintillating (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt - Per nom.Fails WP:NOTDIR. Aru@baska❯❯❯ Vanguard 10:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @DGG: So a company started by a woman (or family) in the Emirate of Oman, with their headquarters in India, getting in the legal news in the US for hiring program engineers in Massachusetts, and involving themselves in bidding in Ukraine, with annual revenues of 100 to 250 million US dollars, and 2000 employees, are a matter of generally-flawed Indian press, with no specific press problems identified?  Please compare with your previous !vote in this AfD, which is also awaiting a response.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. but certainly feel free to re-create if/when it is confirmed that the show will continue for another season. Joyous! | Talk 00:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii Five-0 (season 8)[edit]

Hawaii Five-0 (season 8) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This series has not been renewed for an eighth season yet. We're still months away from hearing such news, assuming it does get renewed. Actually I think this might go under speedy deletion. Matthew RD 20:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ajf773 (talk) 08:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of buildings and structures in Chad[edit]

List of buildings and structures in Chad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL. Almost exclusively redlinked list entries. Not notable for its own article Ajf773 (talk) 19:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reasons:[reply]

List of buildings and structures in the Central African Republic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of buildings and structures in the Comoros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of buildings and structures in Djibouti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of buildings and structures in Eritrea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Withdrawn by nominator recent edits give me reason to support keep
List of buildings and structures in São Tomé and Príncipe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Withdrawn by nominator recent edits give me reason to support keep
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lack of editing of articles is not a reason for deletion. There is no deadline here. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • No but WP:LISTN is, which is what the whole purpose of this AfD is to establish whether or not this has been met. Why am I being told this by an IP? Ajf773 (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are being told this because your last comment implied that "barely any contribution since then" is a reason for deletion. And what does my lack of registration have to do with the subject under discussion here? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 07:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reasons for AfD are at the header of the nomination. In five years with nil effort to make them worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia - hence the AfD. And in my opinion, editing Wikipedia should only be for registered users, it's far too easy to switch to another ip and conceal an editing history.Ajf773 (talk) 08:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New York Open Judo Championship[edit]

New York Open Judo Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage. A listing of people who participate in the event does not make it notable TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arcturian Gate[edit]

Arcturian Gate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a promotional walled garden created by a pair of single purposes accounts. Non notable business. This is a vanity label with a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. With few exceptions the bombardment of sources is PR, listings and Zone Music Reporter. Their charts are not good charts and they don't provide any coverage about this label. The Soundonsound pieces [4] [5] do not mention this company or aomusic or Tiger & the Helix and are Wikipedia:Fictitious references. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steve Vai discography. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Steve Vai[edit]

List of songs recorded by Steve Vai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, redundant list of songs which can all be found at his album articles. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Hamilton (musical). Joyous! | Talk 03:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeb! The Musical[edit]

Jeb! The Musical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Secondary source coverage basically only discusses the existence of a script; it appears that the musical has not had any public performances. Brianga (talk) 20:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Echoing User:157.235.66.80, we really seem to have no idea because of the lack of English sources, leaving us unable to tell if the references document notability or not. Suggest leaving the article for now, and perhaps someone more multi-lingual than we are can help. Joyous! | Talk 00:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kaysha[edit]

Kaysha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No external references Rathfelder (talk) 17:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neill Calabro[edit]

Neill Calabro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability at best, and the primary contributor to the article appears to be running a strictly promotional account for the sole purpose of promoting this author/artist/whatever and his works on Wikipedia. I'm looking for the axe here and perhaps some WP:SALT. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kate - la bisbetica domata[edit]

Kate - la bisbetica domata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches are providing no significant coverage to qualify an article; does not meet aspects of WP:NFILM and does not meet WP:GNG. Only finding passing mentions, such as [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. North America1000 19:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of songs[edit]

Lists of songs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This just seems to copy and organize the contents of Category:Lists of songs and its subcategories, which makes this list subject to continual maintenance and being out of date, while the categorization method should be more complete and easier to navigate. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:22, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent consensus of reliable editors DGG ( talk ) 18:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tune Day[edit]

Tune Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't know if I'm the only one who thinks this is a hoax. Nothing could be found about this person. the claim that he is the "nephew of Nigerian musician 2Face Idibia and great-nephew of Oba Ogundipe Arapasowu I, the 39th Olubadan (Lord of Ibadan)" is laughable. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can see that Google is showing all information about Tune Day via the alternate name/alias Tunde Junior (which is also referenced in the article)https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tunde+Junior%22https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tunde+Junior%22&biw=1218&bih=587&tbm=vid&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYqs26o57QAhXL8CYKHZK_C3cQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#q=%22Tunde+Junior%22&tbm=nws] , from video interviews to music releases. It's all there. Hope this adds some clarity.Cloudcartel (talk) 13:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)REMOVED BLOCKED EDITOR !VOTE[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The article still lacks non-trivial support.reddogsix (talk) 04:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Mentioning that the article lacks non-trivial support here backs up my suggestion above regarding a few revisions. Such as, making improvements to the article. No one said there is nothing to improve, at all. What would either of you suggest as an improvement? I suggested removing any references that don't mention the article outright, if you look above. ScooterbeeZy (talk) 05:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Removing unrelated "references" does nothing to add support to the article. I happen to agree with ST. How about adding non-trivial support, you think? reddogsix (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - @ScooterbeeZy: The sources provided say nothing about the subject.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 06:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 17:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would be willing to change my !vote on the condition that someone can provide the existence (inclusion in article not necessary) of at least two references from reliable (non-user generated, bylined under 2nd party editorial review) non-local sources that contain a substantial mention. I don't necessarily need an entire article about the subject, but at the very least, the mention needs to identify the subject, and why the subject is notable. Fieari (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 03:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tobias Schlingensiepen[edit]

Tobias Schlingensiepen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Minimally sourced WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as a non-winning candidate for office. As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, but rather must be shown and sourced to have already passed a notability criterion for some other reason before becoming candidates -- but nothing here shows or sources that at all. Bearcat (talk) 01:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to know which Google you were searching, because on my Google he gets just two pages of purely local campaign coverage and/or glancing namechecks of his existence in articles about other things, and there isn't even a third page of results to click past the second page to. Bearcat (talk) 14:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is crazy--it's the second time this has happened. I'm unable to repeat the search. Last night I clicked on the "news" link above and it gave me tons of stuff, including a WSJ article that I put in the article. There were more and I intended to return. Now I cannot find them. I'm confident it was the "news" link above and not any of the others. I am baffled.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible you searched without quotation marks the first time? If I do that, I do get additional hits where people whose first name is Tobias are sitting alongside distinct people whose last name is Schlingensiepen. (And I should also note that the WSJ reference is not an article about him in the news section of the WSJ, but a campaign-style biography of him in their "database of campaign-style biographies of every candidate in the entire country" section for the 2012 election. So it's just WP:ROUTINE coverage, not WP:GNG coverage.) Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so because it took me to a WSJ article on the subject. But if it can't be repeated, the argument should be disregarded.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... the search is working again and yielding more results. I'll stay on keep for now but I won't be offended to be on the losing side of this one.--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 17:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Making big deals is not among our inclusion criteria, see W:N.  Sandstein  12:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Lyman[edit]

Ron Lyman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable real estate broker. Bradv 17:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect to Kerala Blasters FC can be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:56, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manjappada[edit]

Manjappada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

its a local organisation and violate guidelinesahil (talk) 17:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 19:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I had assumed that the person adding the AfD template to the article was the nominator. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 11:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala Jami'yathu ahlusunna al salafiyya[edit]

Kerala Jami'yathu ahlusunna al salafiyya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet notability guidelines. Google search for the organization names turns up a few references, mostly to Wikipedia. Google News search turns up nothing. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All-time Albanian derby[edit]

All-time Albanian derby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rivalries are not inherently notable; see WP:NRIVALRY. I can't find any evidence of a WP:GNG pass. Spiderone 16:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 16:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to J. Philippe Rushton. Consensus is that this should not be an article topic. There's not yet consensus about whether any content should be merged and where to, so this redirect is a temporary measure until subsequent discussions figure out what to do with the content in the history.  Sandstein  09:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cold winters theory[edit]

Cold winters theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This theory is a fringe theory which is treated at the article about J. Phillippe Rushton who created it. The article was created by an editor who cited his own article in favor of the theory published in a journal with a reputation for publishing low quality racialist research without rigorous peer review. It did not cite any of the many works ridiculing or debunking the theory. The article is best redirected either to Race and intelligence (which is the wider context for the theory) or to J. Philippe Rushton where it is described as well as the main criticisms of it. Given the long history of POV pushing in this topic I fully expect this discussion to be affected by offline canvassing, as the appearance of a newly registered account within an hour of AfDing this article already suggests. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 15:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 18:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BATTLEGROUNDing by sockpuppet
  • KeepTheory is discussed seriously by multiple scholars in mainstream journals and is not fringe by definition. See [19]. ·maunus has a history of misrepresenting views he doesn't like as "fringe". ·maunus's speculation that I was canvassed offline is entirely untrue and the only POV pushing is his relentless and dishonest attempt to misrepresent academic views which he doesn't like as "fringe", which indeed has a long history. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"It did not cite any of the many works ridiculing or debunking the theory."
So put it in. Apologies for the stupid formatting. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 20:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Editors opinion of "particularly important" is irrelevant. Notability is established by significant coverage in reliable sources that is independent of the original theorist. This is shown in the references. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because pretending only one person discussed this is part of the dishonest tactics. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 19:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've had enough of this. Issuing a civility warning for the above comment. Now, as for Lynn. I see he's categorized under Category:Race and intelligence controversy and this should be too. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well is it false that only Rushton discussed this? And is it likely that Maunus didn't know that? Surely dishonest censorship is worse than the so called "incivility" of pointing that out? How should I phrase this to be civil? Maunus accuses me of being canvassed offline above. Should I put in "suggests" to be civil? Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He never accuses you of anything. Or is User:Samuel Smith 4 not your first Wikipedia account, perhaps? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He does exactly that
"Given the long history of POV pushing in this topic I fully expect this discussion to be affected by offline canvassing, as the appearance of a newly registered account within an hour of AfDing this article already suggests." Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should I have written "Given the long history of POV pushing in this topic I fully expect this discussion to be affected by the dishonest tactic of pretending only one person discussed this, as Maunus's AfD statement suggests." Is that civil? Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm frankly more interested in how an apparently new editor knows that "maunus has a history of misrepresenting views..." but regardless, just stick to the argument about the topic and cease squabbling about how you think Afds should be formatted, or what you think of the nominator, and you'll be fine. I actually think there's a valid argument for keeping -- but you're messing it up with your toxic behaviour here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My "toxic behavior" (complaining about your silly formatting and the obvious dishonesty of the OP) shouldn't really affect the obviously bogus deletion effort here. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need to merge as it is a more expansive theory than many of the theories in Category:Theories. ·maunus simply doesn't like genetic racial difference theories. Why does ·maunus try to imply only Rushton discussed this, while simultaeneously complaining about the lack of critical discussion? Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because the controversy about the topic is already in Nations and intelligence and would only need a few sentences to do the merge. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BATTLEGROUNDing by sockpuppet
It's not a fringe theory having been discussed seriously in mainstream journals. Calling it "racist" is just irrelevant. Yes genetic racial difference theories are "racist" in some sense. Calling them "racist" doesn't disprove them. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 08:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We're not here to "prove" or "disprove" things. Our only concern is determining how independently notable this theory is so we can cover it with a neutral point of view and due weight. The proposition that there are racial differences in intelligence is fringe science that no mainstream anthropologist accepts, therefore this explanation of that difference—posed by notorious racist crank J. Philippe Rushton no less—is certainly very fringe. The only coverage in mainstream journals I can find is a single article in Intelligence and another refuting it. That does not constitute significant coverage. It might merit a line or two in a related article. Joe Roe (talk) 10:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's exactly my point that we're not here to prove or disprove. Or express personal distaste. Which is why I said caliing the theory/theorist "racist" (whatever you mean by it) is irrelevant. Pretty much just name calling. Your assessment of the status of the proposition of genetic racial differences among anthropologists seems pretty irrelevant, even if true which I doubt. The anthropological subfields of psychology or behavior genetics are relevant. Cultural anthropologists aren't trained in psychometrics or heritability estimates. They can say "we are all equal" though I guess. Not sure how relevant that sentiment is. The simple fact is that this has been discussed in mainstream journals, and by policy can have an article. Of course I expect policy to be ignored because you're "fighting racism" or whatever. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 12:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This theory is not about psychometrics or heritability estimates it is about human evolution, which is an anthropological topic. And the status of this theory among scholars of human evolution is that it has zero support and no scientific paper has ever been published about it in a mainstream journal about human evolution. It has been commented upon by only in the context of discussing the race/IQ topic - but it is not considered a serious hypothesis among those who specialize in the study of human evolution. That is why we can have it as a section in the R&I articles - but not as a stand alone article about a theory of the evolution of human cognitive abilities.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 13:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's an evolutionary theory based on a heritability estimate of psychometric variation. It's an interdisciplinary theory. One must estimate genetic variation before one can posit a theory to explain it. EO Wilson for one seemed to consider it valid evolutionary reasoning, so your extreme "zero support" claim is simply not true. Actually it's a lie. Please list all of the evolutionary biologists that have opposed this theory. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That the theory is created by psychologists trying to play evolutionary anthropologists does not make the theory interdisciplinary. Dont shift the burden of evidence. Please list any articles about the theory published in mainstream evolutionary anthropology journals. Please show where it is mentioned in textbooks about human evolution. Please show me where it is mentioned in mainstream reviews of the literature on the evolution of human cognitive abilities. Wilson (who does not specialize in human evolution) has not published anything to the effect of supporting the theory, but is on record stating off hand in an interview that he didn't think Rushton's theories would be so ill received if they weren't about humans - which is not in fact a statement of support for "cold winter theory" nor peer-reviewed publication that actually would demonstrate scientific standing. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 13:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're trying to imply the theory is opposed by evolutionary biologists. There's Joe Graves I suppose, who publishes in "Social Texts". This is really the province of evolutionary psychology. Which anthropology journals would you expect to find an evolutionary psychology theory in? Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 13:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but you are simply not following. Joseph Graves is a geneticist with a specialty in fruit flies and scientific racism, not in human evolution. No evolutionary anthropologist who specializes in the development of human cognitive ability has to my knowledge even given mention of this theory in their works. You will not find it mentioned in works about human evolution. Probably because to the evolutionary anthropologist it is an absurd hypothesis to presume that mere temperature or distance from equator should exert a uniform selective pressure that favors the evolution of cognitive ability - in terms of an ecological understanding of interaction between environment and survival it is so simplistic that it is risible. Read some books about human evolution and see what the theories that are current in regards to the development of cognitive skill, I assure you that this is not among the serious contenders. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 16:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you reference your claims. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 16:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The burden is on you to demonstrate that this theory has notability in evolutionary anthropology.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 16:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No it's not. I asked you to demonstrate that evolutionary psychology theories need to be verified in the evolutionary anthropology literature. You gave no examples. So until you can supply meaningful critiques of evolutionary psychology from evolutionary anthropology, we can just ignore your ad hoc hurdle. And even if you did supply it it would be a notable debate. Samuel Smith 4 (talk) 17:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The theory regards human evolution, and all articles in wikipedia must by basic policy represent the scientific mainstream consensus in the given field. So yes, it is encumbent on you to demonstrate that evolutionary anthropologists consider this theory notable outside of its status as a curiosum in the history of scientific racism. It is not possible or necessary for me to prove a negative - evolutionary anthropologists do not write about it in relation to the evolution of human cognition because it is a non-starter. Mainstream anthropologists and scientists write about it only in the context of the R&I debate to debunk it as the flawed and invalid argument it is. You can find a slew of reviews of Rushtons book that mention it of course (generally negatively), but this shows that the theory is not independently notable, but only as a brainchild of Rushton to which it should be redirected.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 17:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge with Race and intelligence.

I gave a detailed reply to this matter at the fringe theory noticeboard. Apparently, that was the wrong place to place it, so I will copy it to here.

Not well respected among the media or scientists in general, no. No hereditarian model is. However, the point of Wikipedia is not to cover things that are generally well respected, but things that are notable. Wikipedia covers quite a lot of fringe science already that is almost unanimously rejected by the scientific community. As an example think of the recent claims by Bem et al., which are covered in the precognition article. As this article's creator, I thought it suitable that Wikipedia should cover a well known theory in this area. Note, this area concerns differences in cognitive ability between human populations, not human evolution in general for which this theory is not very well known (as noted above). As an example of the notability, consider the discussion (p. 443ff) of this model in Earl Hunt's 2010 textbook, the latest comprehensive textbook in this field (532 pp.). Earl Hunt is quite critical of this model and instead prefers Diamond's model. He refers to them both as just so stories given their speculativeness. Hunt himself published a paper back in 2006 criticizing the results put forward by Templer and Arikawa.[1][2] As an alternative, I did consider putting this model under a person. The problem is that the model has been supported or positively discussed by a number of different authors over the years, making it difficult to place it under a single author. Rushton, Lynn, Arikawa, Templer, Hart, Jensen, Kanazawa and probably others. Thus, it seemed a bit difficult to place it under any of them. As Hunt remarks in his discussion, neither of these authors were the first to propose such a model, Herodotus was (p. 444). Should it be placed under him? That seems seriously misfitting. Thus, it seems to me that this model is notable enough to be included, and it is difficult to place under one particular person. I can think of two remaining options: 1) leave it where it is as a stand-alone article, and 2) add the content to the Race and Intelligence article. One could also consider the nations and intelligence article, but the model isn't really about nations, but about populations. Some nations happen to map fairly well to the populations that have been living there for some time, while in other cases (North America, Australia/New Zealand, South Africa), this isn't so. --Deleet (talk) 23:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC) I can add more references to the article (such as Hunt's criticism). I know the field well because I research the same topic, although I've not published anything for or against this model. --Deleet (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't? You cited this work as supporting the model "Kirkegaard, Emil O. W.; Fuerst, John (2016). "Inequality in the United States: Ethnicity, Racial Admixture and Environmental Causes". Mankind Quarterly. 56 (4)."·maunus · snunɐɯ· 12:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Templer, Donald I.; Arikawa, Hiroko (March 2006). "Temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ: An international perspective". Intelligence. 34 (2): 121–139. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.04.002.
  2. ^ Hunt, Earl; Sternberg, Robert J. (March 2006). "Sorry, wrong numbers: An analysis of a study of a correlation between skin color and IQ". Intelligence. 34 (2): 131–137. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.04.004.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joost de Valk[edit]

Joost de Valk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Only sourced by blogs. The article in The Guardian could have been a good source but Joost de Valk is not mentioned in this article. gidonb (talk) 15:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 07:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yudi Ashady[edit]

Yudi Ashady (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO, WP:NMUSIC, WP:GNG. Topic is lacking significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. Has not produced any notable work. Non-notable musician. Autobiography article. The1337gamer (talk) 14:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 14:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 14:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 03:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bodington Hall[edit]

Bodington Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG: has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, current independent sources only mention Bodington Hall in passing. Ebonelm (talk)

@Andrew Davidson, you mean prize winning architecture which has been relocated for the past three years onto the main Leeds Campus and therefore is not at Bodington Hall? I agree the mural is noteworthy, but that just means the mural should have an article not that Bodington Hall should have one. Ebonelm (talk) 12:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The architecture award was given to DMJ for the design of Bodington Hall, rather than for the mural by HCD. EdwardUK (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out, I have removed the information you re-added about the mural from the article again as it is not relevant to the Bodington Hall, please do not re-add it. Ebonelm (talk) 16:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is relevant and has been restored - the mural was commissioned to be a part of the building - removing this info on the grounds that the mural has been moved and preserved elsewhere is like removing any references to Peter Gabriel from the article on the band Genesis just because he is no longer an active member of the group.EdwardUK (talk) 16:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was giving a talk today about Wikipedia to a crowd of potential volunteers at an editathon. I showed them this discussion as a fresh example of such behind-the-scenes discussion. One of the audience said that they had been at Bodington Hall themselves. This further demonstrates that this was a substantial public institution and, as we see on the article's talk page, it touched a lot of people's lives. Andrew D. (talk) 17:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zsolt Balla[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Zsolt Balla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Balla Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be of non notable person. Franco s (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clásico de las M's[edit]

Clásico de las M's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See WP:NRIVALRY and WP:NOTSTATS; the two teams play each other a lot but aren't geographically that close. The article needs to pass WP:GNG but I can't find any wide usage of the term Clásico de las M's and all I can seem to find are match reports and videos which aren't enough. Spiderone 13:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 13:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claudio Istrate[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Claudio Istrate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Istrate Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be of non notable person. Franco s (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And that would meet WP:NKICK.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. speedied five times, now salted Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Habib Construction Services[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Habib Construction Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Building company in Pakistan. Unsourced claims and, as far as I can tell, failing WP:CORP. They're on all the social media (Twitter, Facebook, Vimeo, etc) but nothing in reliable sources that would make them notable. Yintan  11:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Akansh Malik[edit]

Akansh Malik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Autobiography of an author who does not meet the notability criteria for writers. The claim to significance is a literary prize that does not appear to be notable (an earlier claim of being a best-selling author was removed together with the prod tag). bonadea contributions talk 10:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While I was writing this, the article was speedy tagged but Twinkle created this page anyway. I'm not sure it's A7 material but won't complain if it is speedy deleted. --bonadea contributions talk 10:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Delete. I'm the editor who speedied it. The single claim to fame, that non-notable prize, isn't backed up by the cited source so that leaves... nothing, really. Yintan  10:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Quwa Al-Jawiya–Al-Shorta SC rivalry[edit]

Al-Quwa Al-Jawiya–Al-Shorta SC rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source given to justify the existence of this article is an unreliable Wordpress blog. All I keep running into when trying to find sources for this rivalry are Wikipedia mirrors. There probably is some rivalry between these two teams but I don't believe that an article can be justified (see WP:NRIVALRY). At the moment, this article is nothing more than just a collection of statistics and match results (see WP:NOTSTATS). Spiderone 10:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They can be in Arabic but they must be reliable; all I can find are unreliable sources such as blogs and Youtube videos which are not acceptable. Spiderone 16:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Here are some sources:
http://almalwiyanews.com/2015/12/14/%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D8%BA%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%88-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D8%B7%D8%A9-%D8%B6%D9%85%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA/
Translation: "The eyes of all Iraqi football fans on Monday afternoon will be fixed on Al-Sinaa Stadium which will host the match between Al-Shorta and rivals Al-Quwa Al-Jawiya in the Baghdad Derby. The green of Al-Shorta against the blue of Al-Jawiya is one of the big games that the Iraqi public awaits eagerly each season as both clubs have great history in terms of achievements in the league and the two teams' players form the backbone of the Iraqi national team."
http://www.iraqi-teams.net/2015/12/13/%D9%87%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D9%82%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D9%8A%D8%BA%D9%8A%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1/
Translation: "Al-Jawiya's top scorer, Hammadi Ahmed, will be missing for the Baghdad Derby with Al-Shorta. The match known as Baghdad El Clasico will be difficult for both teams as both teams are very strong technically."
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OWqXjcoONVgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=baghdad+football+club&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtkquj4YDQAhVhOMAKHU9WC0UQ6AEIHjAA#v=snippet&q=shurta&f=false (this one isn't in Arabic)
Translation: "Hassanin Mubarak urged me to travel the length and breadth of Iraq, including Baghdad where there are the four derby clubs of Iraq (Al-Shorta, Al-Quwa Al-Jawiya, Al-Talaba, Al-Zawraa), to see for myself how football was popular everywhere."
Translation: "Given that the four derby teams of Baghdad (Al-Shorta, Al-Quwa Al-Jawiya, Al-Talaba, Al-Zawraa) are also the strongest four teams in the country, they were put in separate groups."
By the way, the 'unreliable Wordpress blog' you mentioned earlier was written by Hassanin Mubarak, one of the most well-known and knowledgeable Iraqi football journalists in the country, so it's not unreliable. Furthermore, in Iraq, all matches between the 4 derby teams are played at Al-Shaab Stadium (the Iraqi equivalent of Wembley Stadium) instead of being played at the club's respective home grounds, which is further proof that these articles are about the biggest rivalries in the country. Hashim-afc (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to TK Takaishi. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taisuke Yamamoto[edit]

Taisuke Yamamoto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject's only main role is that of teen TK Takaishi from Digimon Adventure 02 (TK was originally voiced by Hiroko Konishi in the debut anime series), and has not reprised the role for the Tri movies. No secondary news sources could be found. Subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines; fails WP:NACTOR. Delete or redirect to TK Takaishi. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close per previous discussion being closed as 'no consensus to delete'. Sk8erPrince is admonished to not make further pointy nominations without allowing a couple months to pass first. Obsessing over this article is disruptive, and furhter pointy nominations may result in further actions. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nanaho Katsuragi[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Nanaho Katsuragi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AFD 1 was closed as no consensus with WP:NPASR. AFD 2 was closed as speedy keep by an admin that has completely ignored an existing guideline, WP:NPASR. That guideline grants me the right to speedy renom any article for deletion, regardless of how long ago the previous AFD ended. Repeating previous arguments in an attempt to reach a clear consensus. Also, I beseech all of you that are willing to contribute to this AFD to not ignore WP:NPASR. It is an existing guideline, and none of you (including myself) are above it.

Repeating previous arguments + Angus and Joe's analyses. Quoting Joe from the article's talk page, "After spending some time looking for reliable sources to use to support this article, I have come up with exactly zero. There is no evidence I can find online that this person meets the requirements for inclusion."

ANN/video game search results:

1) Crayon Kingdom (Cloud - main)

2) Doremi (Ms Seki - supporting)

3) Digimon: Data Squad (Kudamon - supporting)

4) Fafner (Yoko Hazama - supporting)

5) Setsuka (Soulcalibur series - main supporting)

Subject has yet to garner enough significant/lead roles to assert her notability, nor are there any secondary news resources to be found to write up a detailed enough bio. Sk8erPrince (talk) 05:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Honnedevasthana Shamrao[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Arun Honnedevasthana Shamrao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kraakfoss[edit]

Kraakfoss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A farm in Norway. Can't find anything that makes it notable but can't find a proper CSD category either, so brought it here. Yintan  06:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Dubey[edit]

Arun Dubey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Fails WP:NPOL and GNG. Has never been elected to any office. Appears to be a clear case of promotion. The article creator name is "Pracharindia" which translates to "Propaganda India" in English. I am surprised how did this article survive for more than an year. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CrackVerbal[edit]

CrackVerbal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Company not-notable, fails ORG. Article is purely promotional. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Jagannathan[edit]

Arun Jagannathan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Person not notable, fails GNG and is purely promotional. This page is linked to another promotional page CrackVerbal. I am nominating that page too for AfD. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested despite limited discussion.  Sandstein  12:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CIA activities in Asia[edit]

CIA activities in Asia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In addition to CIA activities in Asia, I am nominating the following related articles for deletion:

CIA activities in Africa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
CIA activities in the Americas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
CIA activities in Russia and Europe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

In this case, while the templates—Template:CIA activities in Africa, Template:CIA activities in the Americas, Template: CIA activities in Asia, Template: CIA activities in Russia and Europe—serve a valuable purpose by directing readers to the relevant country-specific pages, the articles themselves are largely an incoherent mess of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. CIA activities in Russia and Europe is a bit better than the other three, but even there virtually all of the content is redundant. TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 19:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yung L[edit]

Yung L (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not enough in depth coverage from secondary sources to establish notability thereby failing WP:GNG —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stanleytux, aside the first two sources you provided (which are interviews), I still do not think the subject has been discussed in significant details. The third source is a gossip which obviously isn't enough to prove notability. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The two sources aren't all interviews. Stanleytux (talk) 05:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That may not be relevant here since subject isn't an actor, comedian, opinion maker or model. The guideline is WP:MUSICBIO, which is more appropriate in this case. Stanleytux (talk) 06:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Exes - New York Chapter[edit]

Texas Exes - New York Chapter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:RUNOFTHEMILL, fails WP:BRANCH. Nothing worth discussing in the main page. I initially posted this as a PROD before noting that one was previously removed. BDD (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 15:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is: Assume the NY chapter is notable. Then readers of the main article can find out about the notable NY chapter and those interested in the NY chapter can have background on the organization itself.Kitfoxxe (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elba Rosa Rodríguez-Fuentes[edit]

Elba Rosa Rodríguez-Fuentes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Tagged for notability since July 2008. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Montanabw What she does is irrelevant to whether she meets WP notability criteria, as asserted by John Patrick Lambert. That she have adequate sourcing in reliable, secondary sourcing does. In this case, I was able to access all of the sources noted on the file as "dead links" and all are primary sources. The article appears to be original research. Thus the question became are there RS to document her. I find very few references that are not legal cases. I have no doubt that she served as a superior court judge, special prosecutor, and director of the legislative services commission, but I do not find sufficient sourcing to confirm that outside of using primary documentation. The one source you found fits the criteria, but I find no others that aren't minor mentions. I changed the location of my browser and still was unable to find sourcing. SusunW (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. Basically, I have seen WP:N as indicating that one good source (which one do you think meeds the criteria?) can be enough, though at least three is preferable. It looks like we have pretty good verifiability, so the question is if we have notability. I am reluctant to !vote delete on this article, but I am curious if you feel that it does need deletion, and am willing to take a second look at my original position in light of your assessment, which I respect. Montanabw(talk) 02:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm closing this early IAR to avoid further disruption by the subject and his PR staff. Someone unconnected with the subject is welcome to try to start another article, paying full regard to BLP sourcing requirements. DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Riz Story[edit]

Riz Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After spending a rather lengthy period of time with Riz Story on IRC working through their concerns with the article, I find myself in the unfortunate position of not actually finding enough information to merit an article. In cleaning it up I actually added more ((citation needed)) tags than I removed. There are plenty of minor facts that can easily be verified (such as his membership in various bands and the fact that he has made movies), but I simply could not find any significant, independent, reliable coverage about him. I cannot find any independent sources linking him to the TogethermenT label, nor can I find any good connection between him and the artists he's supposedly worked with (other than the website's he's apparently created for them).

TL;DR: fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Primefac (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


There is also the release of my album A WINTER ROSE The Official Soundtrack which contains every artist that the person below falsely claims I have no connection to. The artist manager can be reached for further verification that all of the artist mentioned are on contract with TogethermenT and work directly with me. The album credits and the numerous BILLBOARD Hot Singles Charts top ten songs also mention my label - The credits clearly state my name as composer and producer and I own 100% of copyrights and publishing for the music referenced on my page.
Lilith, "Badass Bitch" went to #1 on the BILLBOARD Hot Singles Chart, i wrote, produced, and released the track on my label, TogethermenT - ETHEREAL "Scattered Time" went to #5 on the BILLBOARD Hot singles chart, i wrote, produced, and released the song - COOPER ALAN'S first single went to #6 on the BILLBOARD Hot singles chart, i produced, arranged and released the single on my A WINTER ROSE official soundtrack album. All of these songs appear on my album A WINTER ROSE Official soundtrack on EVERY digital store including itunes, amazon etc.
As for the assertion that my page should be deleted, it's been up for over 16 years at which time I signed my first of many worldwide record deals. MAJOR WEB COVERAGE CURRENTLY UP: ALLMUSIC.COM, BILLBOARD, ROLLING STONE, METAL HAMMER, NME, VARIETY, EXTRA TV, MTV etc etc.-
As a director I currently have a film coming to theaters starring major hollywood names. See IMDB for verification - A WINTER ROSE Starring Billy Zane, Paul Sorvino, Theresa Russell, Kim Whalen, Taryn Manning, etc. etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 06:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Meopa, once again you either intentionally or accidentally fail to read what has been posted. I never said you weren't connected to TogethermenT (or any of your artists/projects); I said I couldn't find evidence of such, and nothing approaching significant coverage of you as an artist. I have repeatedly asked you (on IRC and on the article's talk page) for suitable references and you have continually failed to give them. Primefac (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Beside facebook, itunes, variety, BILLBOARD, company websites, hundreds of pages of google results, spotify, over 250 online stores and endless press.. what exactly would you consider to be "evidence of such"  ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 06:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to see some of that "endless press", actually. I looked through probably forty google search pages (both generic and GNews) and came up with nothing more than brief mentions (and, of course, the references on the article as it currently stands). The Variety411 piece is a good article, but it's the only in-depth coverage I can find. Primefac (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A quick google search of the name RIZ STORY will reveal a 20 plus year, international career in music and film. press in variety, rolling stone, BILLBOARD etc is easily searchable. Everyone of the artist that he works with appear on this album A WINTER ROSE Official Soundtrack (LINK: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/winter-rose-original-soundtrack/id1163031474 )
the variety article mentions that i am a "long time veteran in the music business". who sent you to try and delete my page? I think the wikipedia community would like to know why your out to erase my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 06:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to be technical about it, you did. It's called the Streisand effect; you asked for help in IRC to fix your page due to recent vandalism. I was attempting to do so when I realized that it might not be suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. I'm more than happy to be proven wrong, but so far I remain unconvinced.
Two notes: first, please add new comments at the bottom of a page. Second, make sure to sign your posts with ~~~~ so we know who's posting. Primefac (talk) 06:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
HUGE wall of text from the principal COI editor. Contains sources for those interested.

KEEP PAGE - there is a long list above of international press from both major and minor outlets dating back to 1995. He has been signed to several major labels and appeared at europe's largest music festivals. his band ANYONE is an international act having released albums on both the ROADRUNNER LABEL and TogethermenT label and they currently have a song on the BILLBOARD Hot Singles chart "fly away" at *8.

"SAVE PAGE" As a director he works with Billy Zane, Paul Sorvino, Taryn Manning, Theresa Russell, Edward Furlong and is releasing a major film in the largest theatrical distributor, REGAL CINEMAS.

WHY DELETE? He has worked with some of the biggest names in the biz, including taylor hawkins, David Silveria, and is band is considered highly influential. https://www.amazon.com/Echoes-Traces-Explicit-Infinika/product-reviews/B00ND82Y2S

KEEP PAGE FOR SURE! He is clearly an international figure:

MTV ARTIST PROFILE: http://www.mtv.com/artists/anyone/biography/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:BC1A:5212:4860:D180 (talk) 08:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PROOF THAT RIZ STORY wrote the music he claims to have written -

One of Riz Story's videos hit over 2 million view. He also wrote and produced the music and released it on the following album (LINK: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/winter-rose-original-soundtrack/id1163031474 ) and included it in his film A WINTER ROSE (LINK: http://www.awinterrose.com/kaliyani ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 07:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


A SMALL SAMPLING OF INTERNATIONAL PRESS:

MTV ARTIST PROFILE: http://www.mtv.com/artists/anyone/biography/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:BC1A:5212:4860:D180 (talk) 08:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXTRA TV: http://extratv.com/2014/06/13/extra-hangs-at-the-premiere-of-indie-film-a-winter-rose/

VARIETY: http://variety411.com/article/riz-story-embodies-indie-spirit-in-a-winter-rose-4136368/

http://archive.alternativenation.net/interview-infinika-supergroup-featuring-ex-korn-anyone-members/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1746046/bio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:BC1A:5212:4860:D180 (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.spark-rockmagazine.cz/byvaly-bubenik-korn-david-silveria-v-zari-predstavi-projekt-infinika

http://roadrunnerrecords.co.uk/2008/02/through-the-keyhole-with-riz-story/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:BC1A:5212:4860:D180 (talk) 09:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://teamrock.com/artist-directory/i/infinika?id=5hGCagYjOrz518YaxzPezG

http://www.filmmusicsite.com/en/soundtracks.cgi?id=38977

http://www.rockhard.de/news/newsarchiv/newsansicht/35754-infinika-streamen-sechs-neue-songs-von-echoes-and-traces.html

http://rateyourmusic.com/artist/anyone http://www.kpopstarz.com/articles/112200/20140916/korn-drummer-anyone-singer-debut-new-band-infinika-drop-digital.htm

http://www.darkside.ru/band/12187/

http://www.underground-empire.com/reloc.php?reloc=http%3A//www.underground-empire.com/singlenews.php%3Ftime%3D20120127221314

http://tutupash.com/banda-del-ex-baterista-de-korn-da-fecha-su-album-debut/

http://www.lajsiab.com/VDRJd29xN1phSkUx

http://amass.jp/43588/

http://muzyka.wp.pl/title,Byly-perkusista-Korna-wrocil-do-grania,wid,678205,wiadomosc.html?ticaid=1181d1

http://metaltrip.com/infinika-la-banda-de-david-silveria-se-disuelve/

http://celebrityimages.org/celebrity/4517090/2252947

http://kzk101.com/?p=5623 http://www.vs-webzine.com/InfoVS-INFINIKA+est+un+nouveau+groupe+r%C3%A9unissant+David+Silveria+(ex+batteur+-72373.html

http://video.hmongcam.com/search.php?q=riz+story

http://ru.tunes.zone/movie-zimnyaya-roza-soundtracks-231068

https://fanoegerm.wordpress.com/2012/01/28/ex-korn-drummer-joins-forces-with-anyone-members-in-infinika/

http://www.infomusic.ro/2012/01/david-silveria-ex-korn-se-pregateste-de-infinika-clip-promotional/

http://headbanger.ru/news/18100?lng=en

http://www.batera.com.br/Noticias/korn-batera-da-formacao-original-quer-sua-parte-dos-lucros

http://www.radiometal.com/article/infinika-avec-lex-korn-david-silveria-premier-album-pour-septembre,156238

https://article.wn.com/view/2014/07/31/Former_Korn_Drummer_David_Silveria_And_Former_Anyone_Frontma/

http://everything.explained.today/Riz_Story/

LOUDWIRE: http://loudwire.com/former-korn-david-silveria-clashes-politics-infinika-riz-story/

http://www.last.fm/music/INFINIKA

http://insaneblog79.blogspot.com/2012/01/infinika.html

http://ringostrack.com/en/movie/a-winter-rose/8285

http://mydrumlessons.co.uk/2014/08/former-korn-drummer-to-release-infinika-debut/

http://www.vandohalen.com.br/ex-baterista-do-korn-e-demitido-de-projeto-por-apoiar-politico-racista-e-xenofobo/

http://www.mlive.com/158669/mlive/prnewswire/prnauto.ssf?/mlive/story/?catSetID=7007&catID=&nrid=274586381&page=47

http://www.wirx.com/2016/04/04/david-silveria-and-infinika-frontman-riz-story-clash-on-social-media-over-political-views/

https://www.discogs.com/artist/310414-Riz-Story

http://portalternativo.com/2016/04/david-silveria-es-echado-de-infinika-por-sus-simpatias-con-donald-trump/

https://tbirdsradio.com/ex-korn-and-anyone-duo-form-infinika-release-debut-album-echoes-and-traces-available-worldwide-now/

http://crypticrock.com/interview-david-silveria-riz-story-of-infinika/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rizstory

http://musicwn.com/browse.php?artist=INFINIKA

http://www.fandalism.com/rizstory/FC5

http://alchetron.com/Riz-Story-833097-W

https://vk.com/infinika

http://rateyourmusic.com/artist/infinika

http://www.theprp.com/2016/04/02/news/ex-korn-drummer-david-silveria-booted-infinika-trump-supporter/

http://www.liquisearch.com/riz_story/career/music

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/former-korn-drummer-and-ex-anyone-frontman-to-release-infinika-debut-in-september/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 06:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://rockrevoltmagazine.com/interview-infinika/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 06:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Mr Story if you step back from all the nonsense, I think there's sufficient to meet WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. The first Anyone album got some reviews, he worked with Lilith on her "Badass Bitch" that did OK in the charts, he's made films that have got some attention. If one could dig through the self-promotion and walls of text, I believe there's enough left. Bondegezou (talk) 12:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


PROOF THAT RIZ STORY wrote the music he claims to have written - LINK: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2175470/soundtrack NO LESS THAN 4 singles from mr. Story's album A WINTER ROSE The Official Soundtrack are currently in the BILLBOARD Hot Singles Chart - ALL TOP TEN, including LiLITH "Badass Bitch" which reached #1 two weeks ago.

One of Riz Story's videos hit over 2 million view. He also wrote and produced the music and released it on the following album (LINK: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/winter-rose-original-soundtrack/id1163031474 ) and included it in his film A WINTER ROSE (LINK: http://www.awinterrose.com/kaliyani ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 07:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

A SMALL SAMPLING OF INTERNATIONAL PRESS:

Delete Walls of text above do no — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:75BD:EEA5:DE50:B25C (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP PAGE FOR SURE! He is clearly an international figure: MTV ARTIST PROFILE: http://www.mtv.com/artists/anyone/biography/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:BC1A:5212:4860:D180 (talk) 08:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

another wall of links

A SMALL SAMPLING OF INTERNATIONAL PRESS:

  • As a note, I have requested that Ms Wiess gets her own username. It's up to her to actually listen (unlike her boss). Primefac (talk) 17:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would suggest that instead of posting a massive wall of links Meopa picks, say, 5 that look like the best ones and put those up for review. Nobody is going to review such a huge number of links and a handful of high quality sources are much better than huge numbers of poor quality ones. Hut 8.5 17:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
More links (really just the same links)

MTV ARTIST PROFILE: http://www.mtv.com/artists/anyone/biography/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:BC1A:5212:4860:D180 (talk) 08:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Riz Story (talk • contribs)
  • Riz, thanks for commenting. I thought you were in Fiji. I also thought that I'd been talking to you since yesterday. Crazy, huh? I really suggest that you stop posting the same damn links every time you post, it's getting tedious. I had nothing to do with the page being protected, and I am clearly not the only person able to edit the page. At the moment I'm just trying to firefight you and your PR team from continually hampering this discussion by posting inordinately long walls of text on it. Primefac (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, your listed as the only person who wanted my page deleted. why exactly? There is a massive internet presence regarding my career - and every time my staff post it you scold them and hide it under a green tag, as if it's not pertinent. If your mission is to personally attack me at least be honest about it.
  • As mentioned in the comment by Crash below, I nominated the page, I'm not unilaterally deciding it should be deleted. I am not personally attacking you. I am making it easier for others who are engaged in this discussion to find the actual, well, discussion. I have hidden the links provided by your staff because wading through 300 lines of links just to find the actual conversation is difficult. If I say "here are 300 lines of links" then it's easier to digest. Primefac (talk) 18:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly fails WP:GNG. Actually, no, they are the one that nominated it. There's a difference. Notice all the ones saying delete? Yeah, we're the ones that think it needs to be deleted. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 18:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Fictional Food[edit]

AfDs for this article:
List of Fictional Food (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Snozzcumbers, Filboid Studge, Duff Beer. The list is endless and wholly trivial. TheLongTone (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 05:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you like check out: Fictional food in reality. Some of the dishes seem to be lost historical recipes, not fictional.Kitfoxxe (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. On the face of it a consensus to at least redirect, but considering that what seem to be relevant sources were added at the very end, I think that "no consensus without prejudice to renominate" is more appropriate.  Sandstein  17:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Rita Epik[edit]

Maria Rita Epik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable singer. Quis separabit? 01:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BabbaQ -- as the nominator, I take offense at "Has obviously been part of a political boycott", and am equally confused as to what you are talking about. If you wish to debate the quality or wisdom of the nomination, that is one thing; throwing around nonsensical accusations of political bias is quite another. Quis separabit? 18:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Rms125a@hotmail.com - And I should not "take offense" to your rationale for deletion? "Delete: as non-notable singer." - what is that? Come one. And for the rest of your comment, it is just nonsense. Come up with a better rationale for deletion instead of throwing a tantrum. BabbaQ (talk) 17:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@BabbaQ: No, you shouldn't take offense at me because I did not initiate this squabble by claiming you had a "political boycott" in an AFD you had initiated as the motive for this AFD, which it is not. I nominated Irwin Smigel for deletion, so am I anti-Jewish American dentists?? You basically accused me of bigotry and I should bring this entire incident to ANI for an admin opinion.
And as far as not understanding what "non-notable singer" means, while I wouldn't have thought that difficult to understand, as everyone else seems to understand it, I will spell it out for you: She does not, IMO, meet the threshold for notability as her entire career -- according to her article which as far as I know you have not bothered to update or improve in any way since the AFD started -- consists of NOT appearing (for whatever reasons) at "the first ever Eurovision Song Contest hosted by Israel". And what she would have sung ("Seviyorum") had she shown up is irrelevant. Quis separabit? 21:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you nominate an article about a boycott, how can you then interpret a rationale about boycott as directed to you. The comment was not directed at you but to the article subject. Your response was aggressive and bad faith and I will not respond to this anymore. P.S I am Swedish. BabbaQ (talk) 17:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 12:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 23:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@BabbaQ, well you're no Dolph Lundgren or Isabella Rossellini conversationally, so I guess I misunderstood you. I thought you were imputing to me an attempt to AFD ("boycott") the article because of the subject's nationality (Turkish). Evidently I misunderstood that but you could have been a lot clearer. Sorry. I did not nominate an article about a boycott; I nominated an article about an insufficiently notable singer. The boycott incident which kept her from performing at the Eurovision Song Contest in Israel is mildly interesting but nowhere near compelling enough to push her over the threshold to notability, IMO. Yours sincerely, Quis separabit? 21:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 05:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per what?BabbaQ (talk) 23:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pure, IDONTLIKE. Eurovision is the largest music contest on television in the world. Sources are available. You might not be a Eurovision fan but that is irrelevant.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not claiming that this is the most elegant WP:HEYMANN I've ever done, but there was significant attention paid to her career in English back in 1979, and by Turkey's national English-language daily newspaper in recent years.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Courtney Rashon[edit]

Courtney Rashon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not verified as an author, hasnt sold books, etc Arg3nt1n0 (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)— Arg3nt1n0 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftified by Shadowowl. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Veissière[edit]

Samuel Veissière (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed even though I informed the author user of this not satisfying WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF and they acknowledged it, even when I said this man's career was simply too soon, so I'm not sure why this was removed; likewise, there's still nothing suggesting better as there's nothing significant and WorldCat or GoogleScholar. SwisterTwister talk 00:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.worldcat.org/title/ghosts-of-empire-violence-suffering-and-mobility-in-the-transatlantic-cultural-economy-of-desire/oclc/751724317&referer=brief_results
https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cites=7186797955184696673&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en
The subject appears to have relevant media coverage regarding his expertise in Tulpamancy as a featured scholar. See link of popular media and press below (third link was present before request for deletion).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3j5gtUCkJg
https://theawl.com/all-my-friends-are-in-my-head-d307d99f366d#.waii68knm
http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/tulpamancy-internet-subculture-892
Insufficient secondary sources were provided on the subject’s expertise regarding Tulpamancy. Two sources have been added as references.
Section titled “cultural affordances” has been deleted due to insufficient references. Krista Liberio (talk) 22:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not having seen any further comment, I change my recommendation to delete.--Rpclod (talk) 17:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Myat Nyan[edit]

Myat Nyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable implantologist and associate professor. Sources support that he actually exists but do not support his education, personal and career history. Phyo WP (message) 01:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Negative, this self-published source in Burmese mentions only brief personal history about his ethnicity and his family, and mentions that he is a teacher and clinical researcher. This self-published source does not support the article. Phyo WP (message) 21:04, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nominator, Davey2010, thinks it might be the case that tabloid sources cannot be used, however, our official guideline, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, does not say that. Davey may be thinking of the essay Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources, but even that does not say do not use them. It merely says that they "should be used with caution, especially if they are making sensational claims." From Davey's later comments, I am taking it that he no longer supports deletion, even though he has not offered a bolded !vote. SpinningSpark 19:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vincenzo Pellegrino[edit]

Vincenzo Pellegrino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor, Can't find any evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not gonna lie the list of things they've been in is impressive however they've been in 26 TV programmes/films yet there's barely nothing to confirm any of it (found a few mentions but nothing substantial), As they were born in the 60s/70s I don't expect sources to be amazing etc etc however I do expect a bit more than just a few mentions, As with any other AFD I have no issues at all with redirecting or ofcourse if you can find anything substantial I'd be more than happy to Withdraw. –Davey2010Talk 15:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately Daily Mirror and The Sun cannot be used in articles as they're tabloid newspapers, Thanks for finding those tho, –Davey2010Talk 11:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Davey2010, I am aware of no such policy, nor of a hard line between "tabloid" and "non-tabloid" newspapers. My understanding is that major daily papers may carry more or less weight, but that the papers cited confer some degree of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi E.M.Gregory, I couldn't tell you where or when but I recall someone somewhere saying that a few tabloid newspapers shouldn't be used, If these can indeed be used I would happily use them but as far as I know these couldn't or atleast shouldn't be used?, Anyway I'll ask at the help desk now, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good find - If anyone can find anything beyond a two-bit mention I'm always happy to withdraw however as there's a few deletes above I can't really withdraw. –Davey2010Talk 16:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So, I ran a proquest search, in addition to the 3 TV series, he's done quite a bit of stage work, here (TRUST NO-ONE Which former soap star is telling the truth in this mystery?, Beacom, Brian. Evening Times [Glasgow (UK)] 28 July 2005: 16.[24] ) for example, is an article about a play he's, Framed!, based on a Malcolm Rose thriller, that describes him as a "soap star) and references both Casualty & Where The Heart Is. Quite a lot of stories came up, actually, I scanned the listings and there seemed to be more than enough to put a pretty good article together.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
E.M.Gregory - Wait sorry I wasn't saying the source you provided was a two-bit mention - I was meaning as an overall thing - The source you provided is perfect, Ah I can't access that one as I need a proquest account (and it doesn't seem to recognise "English Wikipedia" as an Institution lol ... You can't blame me for trying! :), Anyway thanks for providing those 2 sources, I've asked at the Help Desk so if those others can be used I'll add them in, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I did get that. Just, your comment prompted me to run a Proquest search, just checking my judgment. I'll be interested to hear what editors on that board have to say about your question. Also, I have been involved in AFDs where Noms in the position you are now in iVoted keep.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh right sorry, Well thank you for finding more :), One editor reckons we can use them with caution but not sure how that can work out ?, As much as I love and follow IAR I really can't use it here, Sad times!, Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haystack TV[edit]

Haystack TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted once before as advertising and suggestive paid advertising at that, and it was now contested with the sole basis of "Haystack TV is a company that has a service I use. This is a popular service with a strong online presence. The article was well done and I had contributed some edits" which is not only unconvincing but it's not showing how the past concerns of both advertising and the overfocus with advertising can be fixed, if at all. The author account is now confirmed as using other accounts and thus is no longer active, and the article had no other contributors; my own searches are not finding anything but trivial PR.

The listed sources here consist of also what the company would have for its own advertising, not only are the sources repeated perhaps to enhance the illusion of sources, but sources such as TechCrunch and literally other local PR-publishers, notorious for republishing the company's own words, are not convincing for any notability or substance, and we should not mistake them as otherwise. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hellevator episodes[edit]

List of Hellevator episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short episode article without reliable sources Jax 0677 (talk) 04:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transition design[edit]

Transition design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This jargon-filled over-wordy formulation of a rather common idea seems to be based on one person's views, without any evidence of general acceptance. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Qasim Maka[edit]

Muhammad Qasim Maka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, promo, failing WP:GNG The Banner talk 08:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The two "keep" opinions do not address the arguments for deletion and indeed barely make an argument of their own.  Sandstein  09:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sturt Mall[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Sturt Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. this was last nominated 4 years ago. This is a relatively small shopping centre by WP standards of 15,000 square metres LibStar (talk) 09:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
even with additions it's just routine coverage of renovations in a local paper. All shopping centres get renovations. LibStar (talk) 09:10, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Memorial Beach Tour[edit]

Memorial Beach Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, unsourced concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that has been tagged as being unreferenced for a year. Aspects (talk) 12:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Varvara Semennikova[edit]

Varvara Semennikova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from more specific considerations such as WP:1E (her alleged notability stems from maybe being very old but maybe not, thus the one event I refer to here is "getting really old" not "an individual birthday") and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, this individual does not seem to meet the general guidelines of WP:N. There is no Wikipedia policy that grants automatic notability to people of an extreme age (numerous AfDs on the "oldest" individuals have been kept or deleted based on their individual merits), which makes WP:N the relevant policy. Specifically, I do not see any evidence of non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent third-party sources. She seems to have had brief bursts of attention and a handful of clone or near-clone obituaries after her death, meaning that she lacks the sustained coverage that would distinguish her from thousands of other individuals claiming (falsely or otherwise) to be very old. There's nothing here of encyclopedic merit that could not be covered by the longevity claims article. Canadian Paul 14:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • From [25], "Varvara’s usual diet comprises fresh fish (she eats it in the raw after flaking away small pieces with a knife)".  That's "a vague mention that she enjoyed eating fish"?  I don't see that as "vague".  Unscintillating (talk) 03:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ANYBIO criteria #1 is: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times." What award or honor has the subject received? I see nothing. ANYBIO criteria #2 is: "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." Again, there is no contribution other than happenstance old age, which WP defines as not inherently notable.--Rpclod (talk) 11:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frederik Valach[edit]

Frederik Valach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the articles creator on the grounds that the Slovak Super Liga is fully pro. While this is accurate, it is also not relevant as he is yet to play in that league. His one appearance for Slovan Bratislava was actually for the B team in the 2. Liga. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Henderson (weightlifter)[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Sam Henderson (weightlifter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to fail guidelines for biographical articles, specifically WP:BASIC and WP:ATH. Although a Google search did yield some references to the subject, they did not meet the standard for in depth coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. Found coverage appears to be far too brief and in some cases trivial to establish the encyclopedic notability of the subject. That said I have added this to my watch list as it is entirely possible that Mr. Henderson may at some point rise to that level.

The article creator is encouraged to peruse the linked guidelines and if additional sources exist that may lend themselves to establishing encyclopedic notability, please add them.

(Note: I intended to PROD this article however it has previously been deleted via AfD and so I am sending it back. I am fairly sure that the time difference and changed circumstances of the subject preclude CSD.) Ad Orientem (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the sentiment, but elevating all transnational competitions to the same status as NOLYMPICS would be a bridge too far for me. It would open the floodgates and seriously undermine WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Setting aside WP:ATH we still have the problem of BASIC. ATH does not automatically confer notability. You still need in depth coverage from reliable sources and I am not seeing that. That said I have a feeling that Mr. Henderson may well end up ringing the N Bell at some point in his life. I recall the original article about a young weightlifter in high school. This strikes me as a highly motivated young man who is going places. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I took a look at the six refs in the article. Five of them are completely trivial. The one that is not appears to be, if not trivial, than at least well short of in depth in its coverage of Mr. Henderson. Both individually and collectively they do not come close to satisfying GNG/BASIC. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to what Ad Orientem said, all but two of the sources are from the International Weightlifting Federation, the British Weightlifting Federation, or the Welsh Weightlifting Federation. None of these can be considered independent under WP:GNG. The same goes for the County Council webpage, it does not appear to be a newspaper, but just a government website. That just leaves the BBC, which is a single mention in a team list. That basically leaves the total number of found sources at zero. RonSigPi (talk) 22:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@RonSigPi: I found a few sources, I think this is the best. The question is, does it satisfy :) - Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 16:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To me, no. The article only mentions him twice (a third time in a photo caption if you want to count that). It does mention him breaking British junior records, but the article focuses on Holyhead and Henderson is one of many lifters given passing mention. If that is be best, then I continue to stand by my delete. RonSigPi (talk) 22:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reply Sounds like someone who votes delete while not having read the article! I can list tons of articles that are not listed at WP:Nsport (weightlifting is not listing at WP:Nsport) while there are, and I created 1000s, of weightlifting pages. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 22:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds to me like someone who HAS read the article. Beyond which see WP:OTHERSTUFF. And if editors are deliberately creating articles that they know do not meet the community's guidelines and standards, that would be a source of concern to me. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Spinningspark per CSD G5 (non-admin closure). TonyBallioni (talk) 00:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shenzhen Ok Biotech Technology Co. Ltd.[edit]

Shenzhen Ok Biotech Technology Co. Ltd. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 02:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of interstates[edit]

History of interstates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary content fork of Interstate Highway System. Rschen7754 01:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it shouldn't be deleted because it's a good article45.51.202.109 (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ithink my articlr shouldn't be deleted because i made it so people could know the history of interstatete routes Tren ligero gdl (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Wade Hindorff[edit]

Cory Wade Hindorff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough for Wikipedia. Flagged up in another AfD. ADDITIONAL: I can find little other than social media etc. Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nick VanderLaan[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Nick VanderLaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wow, from the look of this article you'd think VanderLaan was an NBA star. After a series of promo pieces for him created by paid shills we now have a new page created in consultation with the subject himself. Yet again using Wikipedia as promotion. The issues from last time are fairly much the same, he has not played in the meantime.
Not notable?. Article looks impressive but on closer inspection you can see the issues. VanderLaan has not played at the top level. He was not selected in the NBA Draft. In the USA he was in the NBA Development League, NBA Summer League, American Basketball Association (2000–present) and Continental Basketball Association, not making it to the National Basketball League (United States). He did lead a stat in the 2006 CBA but this was in the short lived revival period. Is that good enough? It might meet the letter of WP:NBASKETBALL but this was after CBA had lost much of it's significance. In Spain he played for Ricoh Manresa in the second tier Liga Española de Baloncesto as a bench player[28].
This article, even more than the last, is a major bombardment of routine movement reports, routine game coverage, primary sources and database listings. Wikipedia is not the venue for former athletes to stroke their own egos. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the last AfD, User:SCMatt33 (who voted delete) noted that "If there's not significant, independent coverage from his time at Cal, Virginia, or in the pros, I don't see him meeting GNG". Per my sources listed above, there is significant, independent coverage of VanderLaan from his college days. There is also decent coverage from his time in the Continental Basketball Association during the 2006–07 season i.e. an article can back-up the league-leading rebounding stat rather than just a list of statistics.
Per my post at Talk:Nick VanderLaan – yes, I have been in contact with Nick VanderLaan himself. He reached out to me via Australiabasket.com earlier this month to ask if I would be willing to create on article on him. He actually picked apart User:Duffbeerforme's previous AfD and detailed how he thought he was a notable figure – I have been around Wikipedia for many years now and I have never had any player request an article from me (Conflict of interest never crossed my mind). I decided to commit to a draft after finding multiple sources on VanderLaan. I created this article from scratch and without bias, like I have done with every other basketball player article I have created. I took this article on as a challenge, and it turned out really well. I have no personal connection to VanderLaan, nor am I actually overly fussed over the AfD for this article – I am much more personally connected to articles I have created on players I actually follow and/or admire.
I personally feel deleting this article would be unjust – to me, VanderLaan meets both GNG and NBASKETBALL. DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did find this, which states "Vander Laan played his first two college seasons at California before transferring to Virginia, but will move again because of limited playing time." DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a little confused by that phrasing. Does it mean that he transferred both times in search of more playing time? Or are you saying, "He transferred again, this time because of a lack of playing time"? The Wikipedia article says that he transferred from Cal to Virginia for personal reasons.
The main thing I was initially wondering about is what I read here. It says, "He played two seasons at California and has one year of eligibility remaining if he plays in a program that is not NCAA Division I." I was just wondering how all that works. I don't remember hearing of another player who needed to leave Division 1 entirely in order to keep playing college basketball. Zagalejo^^^ 17:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the playing time – he averaged over 20 minutes per game at Cal but I guess wanted to leave the program for personal reasons. He then played his junior year at Virginia, but didn't get enough playing time (15 mpg). In order to play a fourth season straight away, it seems he was unable to transfer to a Division 1 school. Does Division 1 not require a player to play four seasons within five years? He had already sat out a redshirt season (2001–02), so transferring to another Division 1 school in 2003 would have required him to sit out another year and therefore lose his eligibility i.e. 1999–2004 is five years, so he would not have been able to play in 2004–05 if he sat out 2003–04 – there are cases of the NCAA giving players clearance to avoid sitting out, perhaps this was not granted?? Why he specifically choose an NAIA school is unknown (instead of Division II for example), but it does appear to be eligibility related, like you mentioned Zagalejo. DaHuzyBru (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Avijit Roy. (Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:46, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Abhijit Roy[edit]

Abhijit Roy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:ARTIST or WP:BIO. A Google search doesn't yield many results. NikolaiHo☎️ 01:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turkmen Armenia[edit]

Turkmen Armenia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its content that is directly related to the subject is all unsourced and the overall content seems to be OR synthesis. The term "Turkmen Armenia" (or "Turkoman Armenia") appears to be not used in RS sources dealing with the history of Armenia. The history detailed in the article is already covered in other articles such as Kara Koyunlu and Ak Koyunlu. The article appears to be OR, created to explain why the word "Turcomania" appears near to, or in some cases replaces, "Armenia" on some European maps published in the 17th and 18th centuries. That itself is an interesting issue, but personally I have never seen any published explanation for the term's usage on these maps. The real Turkomania, aka Turkmenia, now called Turkmenistan, is a completely different entity in a completely different part of the world. For this article to exist, sources have to exist that use the specific phrase "Turkmen Armenia".Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification. Looking back at the article's history, its creator says that it was created because "To better organize the history of Armenia, a page for the Turkmen period is required". So the phrase "Turkmen Armenia" is probably derived from those maps mentioned, rather than the article created to explain them. There is a gap in Wikipedia's direct coverage of Armenia's history during the periods covered by this article (setting aside its indirect coverage in articles like Kara Koyunlu and Ak Koyunlu). However, the article's title is not one used in RS sources and the grouping together all of the history of Armenia during the periods covered by this article seems to be not one followed in RS sources. So the OR synthesis argument for deletion remains unless an alternative title that is legitimate can be suggested. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 16:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

comment What do you think of Seljuq Armenia? Perhaps it's not related since its a spin off the Seljuq Empire article, but this Turkmen Armenia concept could be worded differently. Perhaps Armenia under Turkic rule? Still seems vague and OR. I'm not sure who came up with these vague concepts. It's a bit like saying Turkish Greece. There is a Spanish version of this concept called Al-Andalus, but I don't really know what the Turkic tribes called Armenia back then. Would be interesting to research. If it wasn't Armenia (I would assume it wasn't), then I'd support deleting this OR article and merging the information into either Aq Koyunlu et al., or a new article with the name they actually used back then if any particular as of yet unmentioned Turkic name was used for the region. --92slim (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thing Seljuq Armenia is another possible AfD. Perhaps even more so than this article. The Seljuks ruled almost nothing in Armenia - whatever they had captured they very quickly either gave away to local allies, sold, lost, or just walked away from. The Saltukids, Shah-Armens, Shaddadids, etc., were not Seljuks, nor did they even have territory that abutted Seljuk territory. But there is a gap in the history of Armenia that needs filling. Maybe an article with just a time period title. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 21:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have found another one: Mongol Armenia. I agree, all these are potentially OR articles that should be nominated for deletion. I'm putting up my vote. --92slim (talk) 10:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article has been little better than a stub for years, has only one source that doesn't call the article by name, and provides no additional information that several similar articles already provide. --Nucdian (talk) 01:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per discussion above. --92slim (talk) 10:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Irish Scout Jamboree.  Sandstein  12:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ballyfin '93[edit]

Ballyfin '93 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 00:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weed and merge to parent article per Scouting WP MOS. I have mergetagged it and will weeded tomorrow night.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per proposal by Kintetsubuffalo. Or delete per nom. Guliolopez (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Penfold[edit]

Jodie Penfold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I only see routine coverage online. Not enough achievement for WP:NACTOR, not enough significant coverage for WP:GNG. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I see no particular consensus to delete this article. It is possible that it would be better renamed as the event, rather than the person, but that is not a matter for AfD. Enjoy yourselves at the article's Talk page. Joyous! | Talk 02:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Dean[edit]

Charles Dean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTINHERITED. Sad that he died, but he isn't notable outside of the circumstances of his death or his famous brother. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This sounds like a good idea to me. FYI - I am the author of this article. I wrote it at the time Howard Dean and discussion of Charles Dean were every day events in the media. Seemed more notable then than it does now. :) Joegoodfriend (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cocola Broadcasting. Joyous! | Talk 02:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KJOU-LP[edit]

KJOU-LP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't cite any sources, and I can't find any news articles about this radio station. Fails WP:ORG. Should be redirected to Cocola Broadcasting. JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trace McSorley[edit]

Trace McSorley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails notability per WP:NCOLLATH Csrwizard (talk) 20:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from the article's talk page:

McSorley doesn't seem to satisfy WP:NCOLLATH -- see the guidelines provided for notability of college athletes:

"College athletes and coaches are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other WP:ROUTINE coverage. Examples would include head coaches, well-known assistant coaches, or players who:

1. Have won a national award (such as those listed in Template:College Football Awards or the equivalent in another sport), or established a major Division I (NCAA) record.

2. Were inducted into the hall of fame in their sport (for example, the College Football Hall of Fame).

3. Gained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team."

I'd especially note the sources used for McSorley (beyond routine coverage) are heavily dependent on media affiliated with his school. It may be better to use his name as a redirect to Penn State Football or another related article. Csrwizard (talk) 20:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. postdlf (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zappa Records discography[edit]

Zappa Records discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No longer needed. Almost every Frank Zappa album (of which there are about a hundred) is currently being distributed through this label. So if this page were to be updated accordingly, it would overlap quite a bit with Frank Zappa discography. Also from that, there are only about a half dozen or so releases on this label that are not Frank Zappa releases. Only one article links here (the page for Zappa Records), which at least indicates to me that this isn't a very useful article. Friginator (talk) 04:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 21:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan Spencer[edit]

Morgan Spencer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjit Uyangoda[edit]

Ranjit Uyangoda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being an ambassador does not confer automatic notability- fails WP:BIO Dan arndt (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More