The result was merge to Van Canto. J04n(talk page) 17:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable album: the only reference [1] is to a blog, which is a not a reliable source. As such it fails WP:NALBUMS, which basically just applies WP:GNG. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - If the article has room, include the track listing in the article. If not, do a size split. The reason that Central Station (Phoenix) has its own article is because the Metro Light Rail (Phoenix) article would otherwise be too large. This is why WP:NALBUMS says "space permitting". --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted by User:Jimfbleak --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While this is a true event, it has not yet been given a name. A Google search returns no hits whatsoever. That is enough for a rename, but is probably more appropriate for a merge (-> Economy of Cyprus). Even so, this info is totally unrefd and seems to predict the future, as a run on banks cannot really happen until they open. There may have been a run to empty cash machines, but that is supposed to happen and they can be easily re-filled. There were some co-operative banks (open on Sat) that had to shut, but numbers are not available (approx 1/5th total banks) and they are not the norm. Chaosdruid (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notable and an article could be written, but this is obvious a promotional bio that is almost certainly a copyvio, though I cannot find the source, and I think it would be necessary to start over DGG ( talk ) 21:38, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted by User:Jimfbleak, CSD G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: unsourced biography of a living person, wrong article title. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional bio with no secondary sources; seems an obvious copy from somewhere, but I cannot find the source DGG ( talk ) 21:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Subject fails WP:NMMA with only one top tier fight. Papaursa (talk) 21:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Subject fails WP:NMMA with no top tier fights. The article has no sources except for a link to his fight record. Papaursa (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:07, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable video game. Article has existed since 2004 without establishing notability. Atlantima (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable MMA fighter who has only 4 fights, none with a top tier organization. In addition, the article's only source is a link to his fight record. He fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted under CSD G4 by User:INeverCry. (non-admin closure) Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 22:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's a game mod. Therefore, it's very hard for it to be notable - and with precisely 0 references in the article, and no WP:RS coverage to satisfy WP:GNG on the web, this needs deleting. Lukeno94 (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Although reviews have been provided their validity for establishing notability has been sufficiently refuted. J04n(talk page) 17:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-noteworthy documentary film. No relevant articles about the film, the WorldNetDaily piece being a paid advertisement. Thargor Orlando (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can tell how biased this website is 'non-noteworthy', why even add that piece because you didn't think it was noteworthy? I swear this site is useless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.240.135 (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your patience in reading this belaboring commentary. dci | TALK 21:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:NACTOR as an actor and the more general WP:ANYBIO. as a climber fails WP:SPORTCRIT. has not been a significant subject of reliable third-party sources; does not satisfy WP:GNG. Nathan Johnson (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete - speedy-deleted (G10) by admin Orangemike (non-admin close) Stalwart111 00:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Exquisitely sourced article about a rape case involving the "Scottsville District representative to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors". In case someone is wondering, that's in Virginia. WP:NOT#NEWS applies quite nicely here, as does WP:BLP1E, not to mention this would merit nothing more than a paragraph in the bio of the person involved, were that bio to actually exist. It doesn't, which is another indication this doesn't belong on Wikipedia at all. This isn't even a national news story, which is the argument used routinely to keep articles about shootings or accidents. It's a coatrack and the largest case of WP:UNDUE I've seen. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is highly slanted against the subject, non-notable, and should be deleted ASAP. Ducknish (talk) 22:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of WP:notability outside the context of Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme which already covers everything. SEC links not significant coverage to establish independent notability. noq (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of WP:notability outside the context of Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme which already covers everything. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfied, author had moved it to his/her userspace for more work. (non-admin closure) Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 22:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced video game article - no indication of notability Mean as custard (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 --auburnpilot talk 19:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article about a non-notable game that seems to be a recent invention of one person, and possibly a hoax. Unable to find any reliable sources, thus it fails WP:GNG. - MrX 16:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. postdlf (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A list of dolls (yes, really), consisting of originally researched character descriptions. There are no reliable sources--this is the equivalent of a list of Lego blocks: no independent significance, written by and for fans. Drmies (talk) 04:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Johann Martin Augustin Scholz; the page is currently an improperly-formatted redirect. Non-admin closure. dci | TALK 19:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
duplicate of page Johann Martin Augustin Scholz
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Prod contested on my talk page with a rationale that amounts to "I want people to know that this facility exists". Unfortunalely, there's no evidence that third-party reliable sources have taken note already. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable video game. Article has existed since 2008 without establishing notability. User:DGG declined the proposed deletion, saying "can be expanded from Japanese WP", but the Japanese article does not establish notability either. Atlantima (talk) 14:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfication. Moving to User:Stalwart111/Lem Villemin. J04n(talk page) 18:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I had nominated it for deletion previously before someone rejected that because it survived the previous nomination (based on void of consensus/no consensus). Apparently it isn't enough to keep it from getting re-nominated. Please comment guys. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 11:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No third-party sources to establish notability. Kelly hi! 13:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete WP:CSD#G11 (non-admin closure) - MrX 17:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article about a non-notable magazine. I'm unable to find any reliable sources with which to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 12:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:WEB and WP:GNG. No evidence this website is notable. Marokwitz (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:17, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax with an agenda: there is no reference anywhere for a Tihomir who was a lord of the Belegezites, nor of that matter any Tihomir in the region of Macedonia in the 8th century. The article creator had previously cited Tihomir's existence at the Belegezites article with Setton's The Bulgars in the Balkans, but Tihomir is nowhere to be found there. This is simply another of this user's articles where he shows his habit of simply making up stuff (e.g. the link asserted here between Tihomir and Akameros, a petty Byzantine client ruler in southern Thessaly) in order to create a more coherent and impressive narrative of Slavic presence in Macedonia than actually exists. Constantine ✍ 11:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 20:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This rapper doesn't appear to be notable. He fails WP:MUSIC and doesn't pass WP:GNG either, as the only coverage of his music I could find came from a few blogs, almost all of them self-published. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 11:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hona Costello' is featured on tons of notable blogs. Please bring this article back. Sources: http://www.djbooth.net/index/tracks/review/hona-costello-high http://www.earmilk.com/2012/11/29/hona-costello-high/ http://www.thejourneythroughlawschool.com/2012/10/hona-costello-high.html http://smokingsection.uproxx.com/TSS/2013/03/hona-costella-high http://youheardthatnew.com/2012/12/hona-costello-high/ http://www.illcrew.org/Press-Releases--Promos?blogid=7174&view=post&articleid=84495 http://www.gowherehiphop.com/songs/hona-costello-high http://beatspill.com/2012/11/29/hona-costello-high/ http://www.rubyhornet.com/hona-costello-high/
This are the top blogs on the net from a single song. There are countless more. Please bring this article back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.118.194 (talk) 22:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He also passes the Criteria. 1) He is/was featured on non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] 2)Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles. Hes working with Wiz Khalifa, French Montana. and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.118.194 (talk) 22:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. per WP:SNOW. ‑Scottywong| express _ 17:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that Mottura has yet to play a match for any of the fully professional soccer clubs he has been signed to. As always, etc, etc. Shirt58 (talk) 10:38, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination withdrawn. C679 21:38, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a player who has not played football at a professional level, references about whom only amount to routine coverage. C679 10:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Very bloated cruft article, written almost entirely in-universe in style, uses two BattleTech sourcebooks (primary sources) as the sole references and does not establish notability. Tagged for cleanup since 2008 and never improved. Delete/redirect to BattleTech#Inner Sphere.
Additionally, I nominate the following related articles.
There are a slew of other articles in the same vein (e.g. Federated Suns, etc), but many of them were not tagged for cleanup until recently. I would consider them equally worthy of removal but have not listed them due to the more recent cleanup tags.
Some guy (talk) 09:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Was created as a template, so I've moved it to an article. Just wondering if notable enough to keep or if it should be deleted. WOSlinker (talk) 07:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lacks sources separate from the subject to show notability, also appears to be a copy and paste reproduction of previously deleted material. Strongly considered csd but is claiming notability. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep - withdrawn/WP:SNOW (non-admin close). Stalwart111 08:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Season has not even started production yet LiamNolan24 (talk) 05:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:55, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
An unsourced article consisting of an algorithm and some Java code. Seems to be original research. Fails WP:NOTHOWTO. - MrX 02:35, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 15:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Concern was that the article may not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:35, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn. per WP:WITHDRAWN (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 02:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unremarkable topic wherein it only includes few Filipino personalities who's homophobic. Mediran (t • c) 02:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This company does not appear to meet the WP:CORP criteria for notability, especially WP:CORPDEPTH. At the time of nomination, most of the cited sources do not contribute to notability: they are all primary sources (8, 11), routine coverage such as press releases (2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10), etc. The only source that appears to have anything about the company is 1, and although I can't read it in full, the article appears to be about the type of service in general, not this specific company. —Darkwind (talk) 07:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I spotted this company when researching something in highbeam research and googling it seems it is a major firm in this field. Highbeam Research has plenty of sources for 411-PAIN. Florida Trend cites it as a leading firm in its field in the state. That the article has been hijacked by User:411 Painwiki and countless ips adding spam links attracting neutrality/cleanup tags does not justify this being deleted. It needs watching and protecting. It meets guidelines for companies on wikipedia and also passes WP:GNG by number of reliable sources which exist on it.I can think of numerous companies on here and which are missing which are actually notable but not many sources write in detail on the history of the company and most sources are derived from newspaper articles mentioning them such as acquisitions and charity involvement etc.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to List of FIFA Club World Championship and Club World Cup goalscorers. J04n(talk page) 21:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The topic of this article not meet WP:GNG. NickSt (talk) 02:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus and move to Military Spouse. Actually, there is no consensus, and the nomination could be closed as such. However, we have two opinions that she fails WP:GNG, and one opinion that the journal is better covered by WP:GNG than its founder, therefore the middle ground seems to be move.Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any notability whatsoever. The bio centers around the magazine she founded (which itself might be notable), but that doesn't merit notability for her biography. Plus, FYI, creator User:Dmax5o looks to be a single-purpose account. bender235 (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 06:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl in 3-D. Keeper | 76 21:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Her only major role was in The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl in 3-D (all her other roles were either minor or guest roles or in short, non-notable films), which she was nominated for, but did not win, a single award and she has not contributed to the entertainment industry in any way. While she does have an official website and Twitter account, they are not being updated or referred to frequently, a good indication that she is not a mainstream actress (in fact, she has not acted in nearly four years), and cannot be used alone to determine her fan base. Any fan site I see are either Wikipedia mirrors or talk about her as Lavagirl only, the latter violating our policy of WP:NOTINHERITED as she is being liked only because her character or the film is popular (in fact, the article was created around the time of the movie's release), though this does not seem to be the case for critics and box office statistics. Clearly, she fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR. The former states that an individual must have won a notable award or be nominated for several ones while the latter states an actor must have done significant roles in multiple well-known films and shows. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 01:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I don't think this person is notable; however, I don't know I'm allowed to make a vote here since I'm an IP. Am I? --24.145.65.56 (talk) 08:17, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the case then definitely delete - she was only in one major movie, everything else she's done is way low key. --24.145.65.56 (talk) 04:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Admittedly I'm not certain the notability criteria for events, but seeing that it has been tagged for 3 years, best to sort it out. CorporateM (Talk) 21:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 17:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:NFOOTY. WP:NOTMEMORIAL also seems to come into play. It should be noted that the article creator in a matter of days has created over a dozen articles, half have been CSD, and the editor themselves has been indefinitely blocked. Mkdwtalk 23:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to The Runaways#Early years. Keeper | 76 15:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
it has been PROD'd once before & refused with a recommendation to take to AFD. IMO this fails WP:MUSICBIO, Fosters claim to fame is being a member of The Runaways for one month - before they became famous, notability is NOT INHERITED. Does not feature on any Runaways recordings and has only done minor session work since. Thanks 149.241.58.99 (talk) 00:06, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was early close and keep per WP:SNOW and ample precedent at WP:OUTCOMES. Bearian (talk) 17:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non English article listed at WP:PNTFC for more than two weeks. Not eligible for PROD. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP
01:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is that the main article adequately covers the relevant information for this group of non-notable people. Useless redirect; hence delete. I have also IAR deleted the redirect that sparked off this AfD, as it is no longer necessary/ Black Kite (talk) 15:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Generally a list such as this might be notable, but the living people this list is comprised of are not. This article is causing one of the subjects distrress. Since this is relatively "unencylopedic"' we should IAR and delete. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 00:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC) little green rosetta(talk)[reply]
central scrutinizer 00:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of earthquakes in Georgia (country). per nom and consensus. Redirect Keeper | 76 21:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable event. The USGS reports a magnitude of 5.9 with a maximum felt intensity of V "Rather Strong" on the Mercalli Intensity Scale. Some damage to buildings but no deaths. This is mainly a news story (Wikinews has an article) and there's nothing about this event that makes it worthy of inclusion here. Dawnseeker2000 21:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:17, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is simply one part of the massive Disneyland in California and does not have enough gravitas to stand on its own. In short, it is simply not Notable. GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of The X Factor finalists (U.S. season 2)#Fifth Harmony. The consensus seems to be that this group might be notable soon (that is the dominant rationale used for both keep and redirect !votes). Those supporting redirect have shown that, if they might the notable in the future, they are not notable yet, and so should not have an article yet. The consensus thus seems to be that the article should be redirected now, but that the band might be notable enough for an article in the future. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Previous AfD result was redirect, notability issues have not been overcome at this time. Still does not meet WP:NMUSIC. Tgeairn (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I just don't know –anemoneprojectors– I mean I agree with you being the fact they are not fully notable have or have gained enough coverage and the article should be redireted to List of The X Factor finalists (U.S. season 2)#Fifth Harmony but then I disagree with you when you say they have not achieved any coverage or notability actually they have as my links were stating as time goes by they are getting more and more famous then they were when they were formed together on the show. I know for a fact that they are not notable and have gained full coverage but that still does not indicate that the article should be deleted and redirected to List of The X Factor finalists (U.S. season 2)#Fifth Harmony because if it were up to me I would immediately delete the article but its not and we should wait and see what will happen to them in the near future as they are gaining more and more coverage and notability. Welcometothenewmillennium 22:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to give a shout out that Ally Brooke and I are the same age she's 19 years old and so am I she was born July 7, 1993 and I was born October 6, 1993! My next shout out is that I'm gay and always have been ever since I was born and didn't realize till now I'm thankful for what god gave me and appreciate him it feels so good to come out of the closet on Wikipedia because I now feel more proud about myself and who I am as a person. Welcometothenewmillennium 05:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Venomous Concept. Sandstein 08:45, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article. I could not find evidence that it ever hit the charts. The Banner talk 22:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge losslessly to Venomous Concept - Album belongs to a band with at least two notable musicians. IMHO, the following steps need to be taken in order:
--Jax 0677 (talk) 03:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Coming in twelfth place in the 1932 British Chess Championship ain't gonna cut it as far as notability goes. Non-notable. This piece is outta here. Thank you. OGBranniff (talk) 06:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. His best tournament results establish notability. Toccata quarta (talk) 14:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Response. Under what guidelines or policy does coming in twelfth place in 1932 establish notability? OGBranniff (talk) 05:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Van Canto. J04n(talk page) 10:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUM. It has 3 refs:
Reply - If the article has room, include the track listing in the article. If not, do a size split. The reason that Central Station (Phoenix) has its own article is because the Metro Light Rail (Phoenix) article would otherwise be too large. This is why WP:NALBUMS says "space permitting". --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]