The result was keep. Mkdwtalk 01:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No sources indicating the vessels notability. Searches on Google and Google Books yielded no usable results. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 21:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 01:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article has no particular claim to notability in the lede making it difficult to identify notability. Searches of google news and books failed to bring up any sources on this person. Straight google search didn't identify any references either save the IMDB one (which is already doubtful). So, lacking notability and being an unsourced biographical article on a living person, I think it should be deleted GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Tracy Beaker series characters. Mkdwtalk 01:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It seems this is the only character from Tracy Beaker Returns to have her own article whilst the rest direct to List of Tracy Beaker series characters, The list goes in to great detail about all characters so IMO this article's a repeat of what's here –
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone wants a userfied copy I'll be glad to oblige. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is promotional material about a non-notable individual. In fact, it's a direct copy of her website, and although we have permission to use it, this encyclopedia is not designed to host PR materials. Predictably, the article is also the only contribution of the article creator. Now, if someone wants to demonstrate notability through multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, wonderful. But we surely don't have that as of now. - Biruitorul Talk 18:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N. No search results for <"Unsinkable 1912">, <"Unsinkable 1912" film>, etc. Possibly WP:HOAX. jonkerz ♠talk 17:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N. No search results for <"How to save a life" "Nina Smythe">, <"Nina Smythe" film>, etc. Possibly WP:HOAX. jonkerz ♠talk 17:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a non-notable company. The article has two questionable refs, and Google has returned little else. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article about a non-notable application. Fails WP:NSOFTWARE. - MrX 16:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mkdwtalk 01:06, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUMS. No significant coverage by reliable sources. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 16:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete housekeeping non-admin closure: 06:12, 2 June 2013 Boing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs) deleted page "Cafe Impact" (A7: Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) czar · · 07:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No significant coverage in reliable sources. All sources are blogs or associated with the subject. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 15:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Courcelles 17:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable (article has zero third party article reference). Loginnigol (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:ORG. Recent AfDs have shown embassies are not inherently notable. This one is merely a listing of non notable ambassadors. LibStar (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:GNG. All there is to these relations is diplomatic recognition. No agreements, no state visits, no significant trade or migration. LibStar (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
An art dealer who specializes in a particular form of Japanese art, and has written about it some. However, his books don't appear to have made any impact (nor even received any reviews from any major sources). Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOTABLE Flat Out let's discuss it 12:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't appear to meet any of the notability requirements at WP:MOVIE. I couldn't find anything in a WP:SET, but it's proving to be difficult to google, as there are approximately five million nail salons and resturants also named "Soleil Rouge". TKK bark ! 11:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article, which appears to be an autobiography, offers no evidence of the notability of this person, and the only source cited is of doubtful reliability. RolandR (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete (G7) - non-admin closure. Whpq (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant, describes go-around with a fair bit of OR to go with it. Lfdder (talk) 11:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Notification of the existence of this AfD has been made at WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Aircraft, within whose scope this article falls. - Ahunt (talk) 16:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Stars Go Dim. Courcelles 17:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUMS, which is basically a link to WP:GNG.
The only independent review of the album that I can see in the refs is the article at Channel One News, and that's really about the band rather than the album.
A google search throws up nothing which might might meet the WP:GNG test of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Stars Go Dim. Only album released and does not meet N. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was procedural close - wrong venue (non-admin close). Stalwart111 10:18, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This contains testing and vandalism, Therefore, I nominate this for deletion. BlListChecket (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Flat out non notable. I couldnt establish notability in google or even find any film reviews or critiques of this guy's work. I hesitate to BLP-PROD it as it has external links, but they arent exactly credible. TKK bark ! 04:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Userfied to User:Cinemasecrets/Scott King (actor) Mark Arsten (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
BLP without reliable sources of apparently non-notable actor Pinkbeast (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:45, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable footballer, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Hasn't played in a fully professional league and hasn't been subject to significant coverage in reliable sources Hack (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has played club football at national league level although the NSL was not completely pro. Also represented Australia at youth level. Article needs improvement but should be kept.Simione001 (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Shimeru 03:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article is sourced from the subjects website. Koala15 (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 01:08, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
At first glance the Simpel-Fonetik alphabet looked to me like a worthy subject for Wikipedia, but when I went to search for possible references online I came up almost empty-handed. The only thing I found that wasn't published by the alphabet's creator was this article (snippet view) in the Stanford Alumni magazine. By itself, I don't think that this is enough to satisfy Wikipedia's general notability guideline. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Shimeru 03:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No notability in the industry. The main website has not been updated for over 2 years. The functionality described in the article has been popularly captured by npm (software) Voidvector (talk) 07:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Deleted by User:Ronhjones under G7 Mkdwtalk 01:08, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I usually like lists, but I don't think this one is encyclopedic in any sense. Whatever information is here should be in articles on the individual games, or possible the device. DGG ( talk ) 00:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 01:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Trivial, NOT NEWS applies DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Trivial? This is history for NS paramedics and set the tone for many things in our system.( talk ) —Preceding undated comment added 01:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is in question - the only references are to the groups website. Part of the problem is constant revision of edits to a copyviolation of the groups website. I would cause a deletion due to copyvio but perhaps this debate will clarify things. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found passing mentions of this in lists of martial arts, but no significant coverage. Currently the article has no independent sources. Questionable notability, no significant coverage, and lack of independent sources all contribute to my vote. There's also a COI issue.Mdtemp (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The current version of the article has no sources and this style doesn't seem to meet WP:MANOTE either. The organization's website lists 3 training locations worldwide. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm usually all for deleting articles on insignificant martial arts, but this one might need some clarification. Buah pukul is well-known in Malaysia, at least in name. Its fame is, admittedly, mostly by virtue of being the mother of Lian padukan, which is one of Malaysia's four biggest silat schools. But even aside from lian padukan, buah pukul is the origin of various other styles. Among Malaysians who are familiar with silat, the distinct moves of buah pukul are easily recognized and even imitated. You could compare this to Wing Chun among people who are familiar with Chinese martial arts. Speaking of which, buah pukul is actually closely related to Wing Chun. The undeniable similarity between them despite being practiced independently of each other for an entire century is, in my opinion, quite noteworthy from a historical perspective because it clearly points to a common origin. Of course, the article will need to be improved, but I don't think deleting is the solution. Morinae (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus--Ymblanter (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable incident. Planes skid off runways and are written off regularly.
The result was delete. Few participants, but it's worthwhile noting that the nay-sayers have arguments on their side; the lone yes vote offers only that "references can be improved", without actually doing so. Drmies (talk) 01:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Fails WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 19:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Burzum#Discography. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
cannot establish this as Wikipedia-notable. e.g. not covered in several notable publications Lachlan Foley 09:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This band appears to fail point #1 of WP:BAND. After several searches, not finding any coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails PORNBIO, all noms are scene-related. All GNews/GBooks hits are trivial or spurious. NO RS bio content. Possibly speediable as repost of once-deleted article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Britannica International School Shanghai. Redirecting seems to be the most clear and sensible option in this case. The article's only content cites this person as the headmaster of a school, so there is nothing explained in this article that isn't explained in the school article. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:BIO. whilst the first source is indepth, there is no significant coverage of this individual . LibStar (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]