The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for notability in September 2011. No improvement since. BigBadDom007 (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to The Weinstein Company. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found significant coverage for this label. Although the individual films are notable, the label is not. SL93 (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions 15:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This does not seem any different than the countless crimes and murders that happen everyday. The only reason it received more attention than most other cases is because it occurred at the same university where the U.S.'s deadliest school massacre took place less than two years earlier. I have not been able to find a full biography (i.e. birth place, previous life, and family) about the the killer or victim. The racist comments and letters that followed were not solely or directly because of Yang Xin's murder, which was not racially motivated, and since her killer has already been charged and sentenced to life in prison without parole, it is very unlikely anything new about the case will happen and therefore, the chances of this article ever expanding are slim. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. It's a shame that CSD A7 doesn't apply to schools. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Primary and nursery schools are generally non-notable, and there's nothing providing evidence that this one is the exception. Contested PROD. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Listcruft. A list of not particularly remarkable inserts released every fortnight by a news magazine (even if it's the Economist) fits the definition of "indiscriminate or trivial list" pretty well. eh bien mon prince (talk) 03:40, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete - As noted below there is no significant coverage of the article's subject. Fails WP:GNG. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
no real claim to notability, local radio presenter, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, local interest only. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:40, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as a non notable individual event. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
:::If you do not think all NFL games are notable, then you do not know what that word means, or better yet, you only prove how absurd it is to use something as subjective as "notability" as an inclusion standard on the ultimate encyclopedia. --24.112.202.78 (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)-This IP is a sock of community banned editor User:A Nobody[reply]
**WP:BEFORE. Even a simple Google search shows that this event is not merely covered in MMA related sites, but in such mainstream publications as the newspaper USA TODAY and in many articles, such as [1] (this article clearly demonstrates notability: "The Ultimate Fighting Championship's latest live show set marks for most viewers on Fuel TV.") and [2] (multiple paragraph article that discusses the results rather than just listing them), among others. --24.112.202.78 (talk) 13:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)-This IP is a sock of community banned editor User:A Nobody[reply]
*UPDATE: It is no longer factually accurate to claim this event was not covered in reliable independent sources from non-MMA specific media as the article now cites at least two different articles from USA Today. --24.112.202.78 (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)-This IP is a sock of community banned editor User:A Nobody[reply]
The result was No consensus. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another project management product, this one has only a single third party source, and no claim to substantial, lasting notability. OSborn arfcontribs. 03:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help)The result was Speedy Delete. Per A7 Guerillero | My Talk 15:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a non-notable internet meme. From what I can tell Pesoguin is vaguely penguin-like cartoon character whose notability cannot be determined from the sources provided.
All of the referenced sources appear to be promotional in nature. From what I can tell might be some kind of licensed character (like Hello Kitty) or simply a meme like Hampster Dance.
This may even be a candidate for speedy deletion (promotion, nonsense). Salimfadhley (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is unsourced, and my attempt to find coverage in reliable sources yielded a few passing mentions or incidental uses of the expression "social misfitism", but not the extensive coverage in independent sources that would be required to meet WP:GNG. Possibly original research? In any case, not notable. Dawn Bard (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fictional character (declined PROD) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions 15:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As the sources indicate this is no more than a glorified dictionay definition. This article should be rewritten in Wikitionary BO; talk 17:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC) BO; talk 17:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:41, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This non-notable person has no significant achievement in his self proclaimed Author career. Moreover, the references given on the page are mostly blogs (wordpress) and few websites, which are his own websites. - MithilaDesham (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- MithilaDesham (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There was a long discussion already (archived) ensued by some racist and casteist people, and matter is already settled.--Umeshberma (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The references are pure and simple, no wordpress blogs are there, the 11000 ancient jpg plam leaf manuscripts in pdf forms are there as pad files. Anyone can download those files and can imagine how much effort needs to transliterate all these, at least 10 years or so. Mithila Darshan magazine is available through subscription and someone who says that he is not able to find a copy of this journal surely does not have any knowledge about the Maithili language. This id MithilaDesham himself gives reference "Pandey, Anshuman (2009) "Towards an Encoding for the Maithili Script in ISO/IEC 10646": Gajendra Thakur of New Delhi graciously met with me and corresponded at length about Maithili, offered valuable specimens of Maithili manuscripts, printed books, and other records, and provided feedback regarding requirements for the encoding of Maithili in the UCS." and confused this with Mithila Darshan. Gajendra Thakur has edited 105 issues of Videha and most of these are available on google books. This internation gets published in Devanagari, Braille and Tirhuta and is only such type of international ejournal, it devastated the monopoly of high caste people on Maithili language, and broke all status-quoist citadels, now the hate Gajendra Thakur is getting from these racist/ casteist people is very small compared to the love that he gets from progressive advanced people, and from people belonging to all strata of Maithili speaking people across the globe. Gone are the days when hollow false words gained ground, all his works are available online, mere scanning of which would take years, The references for a language like maithili is not able to be easily found but all sorts of references/ cross references are there, ranging from English international ejournal. Be it partilal history of Maithili, be it partial representation of lower strata of society, be it capture of Government resources by a small section of society, all these have been unsettled by Videha> Now only quality rules in Maithili, those books known for quality, have been appreciated by Gajendra Thakur via his two volume collection of papers, His two novels are a lankmark and became classics of Maithili language. His poems, Children literature, epics all these are marvellous. His novel, poems, stories got translated in many languages including English. All these works have been mentioned on Maithili Lekhak sangh (Organization of Maithili writers) website, referenced. As all these works are also available online, where is question of Self proclaimed etc.verboses.--Umeshberma (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MithilaDesham, Vikas11004315, Akshat38 all these ids are involved in vandalism in respect of articles related to Mithila and Maithili. Every three four months they misuse the notices of wikipedia. Its actually win for quality maithili literature movement of videha, which has opposed the capture os Sahitya Akademi awards/ assignments by a handful of persons. In the history of Maithili literature, and in the research of old age manuscripts of Maithili written in Tirhuta and Kaithi scripts, the of Gajendra Thakur will be remembered for ages. As his decipherment of manuscripts has brought forth many inconvenient facts faor the purist, it is natural that they will oppose this greatest personality that the Maithili literature has ever produced.Even when this issue settles these people will again come after 3-4 months for mud-slinging campaign, as they are unsuccessfully trying to spread hate among the classes. --Kapileshwar.raut 03:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapileshwar.raut (talk • contribs)
MithilaDesham etc. has put these type of libelous things on facebook blogs and now on my talkpage too. Gajendra Thakur and videha started Maithili Literature movement and it led to heartburn among the reactionary people. Those people are not able to see the vast corpus of literature by Gajendra Thakur and Videha and the 300+ authors attached with videha nor are able to contribute anything, yes they are here for libelous works and hate-spread work.--Priyanka.rachna.jha (talk) 06:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I also faond some spam messages by MithilaDesham. Already these discussions held, which is archived, and a consensus emerged that if Gajendra Thakur is not a notable person that who other is notable in Maithili language? 2.Notability, the corpus of his writing, both quantatively, and qualitatively, is single largest and best in the history of Maithili Literature. 3.Thanks God, that it all has been scanned/ digitized and have been put on internet. 4.A person who attacks status quo, through his writings, faces ire of the reactionaries.--Manojberma77 (talk) 04:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC) It is syastem error because this AFD template was earlier placed and after consensus it was removed (you may see it in archive), the same comments I have given again. It is in respect of Articles of deletion / Gajendra Thakur. As if it happens again and again it is like a system breakdown at wikipedia, is not it? I work day and night for localization of Maithili at wikipedia, more than thousand translations from English to Maithili, edit articles, but if I am away for a week, I see all deleted!! flagged!! Regarding notability there is consensus that Gajendra Thakur is the greatest personality that Maithili Literature has ever produced, I cannot say about future. James Princep deciphered 20-30 pillar inscriptions of Ashoka, but Gajendra Thakur deciphered 11000 jpg images of ancient scripts, add to this his lexicographic work, his novels-poems-research articles, and above all his maithili literature movement.--Umeshberma (talk) 04:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The same person have started donin this with diiferent id's at AFD. The libelous languages used by KSHAT38 has been repeated, it shows that the castiems regroups in 3-4 months and have deletion agenda at wekipedia and are involved in feeling wikipiedia MAITHILI articles is reactionary use. Regarding notability of Gajendra Thakur I agree with view of umeshbrema/manojberma77/prinyak.rachna.jha/kapilehwar.raut and I have no doubt that the works/research work/ creative writing of Gajendra Thakur and the VIDEHA Maithili litrature movement initiated by him puts him notable living person catagoery.--Ashishanchinhar (talk) 05:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions 15:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Prod. Prod reason was "Unrefernced Article consisting of win/loose stats". Prod Decliner wrote in the edit summary "Deprod – Certainly notable needs improvement not deletion, would be controversial, feel free to AfD if you disagree." Prod decliner did not correct the reason for why the article was proposed. Article was created on the 20th of April and tagged that day with unreferenced. Article creator has come back and added more content without any referencing. Hasteur (talk) 16:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn by original nominator. While I still don't think this song is notable, it is clear to me that it is going to be kept, so I won't waste anymore time with this AFD. Non-admin close. JDDJS (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem notable. The artist does not even have a page. It's only claim to fame is that it samples some of Michael Jackson to a pro-LGBT message. Does not seem like enough to me. JDDJS (talk) 16:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination. While I still don't think this song is notable, it is clear to me that it is going to be kept, so I won't waste anymore time with this AFD. JDDJS (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also the name should change to just "Ben" or BEN, as it's an acronym. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insomesia (talk • contribs) 23:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Per WP:GNG joe deckertalk to me 19:26, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is, to be frank, a mess.
In short, the article does not assert notability in any way; it is heavily laden with fancruft and inappropriate tone; and the sources fail WP:RS completely. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD discussion is intended to get a community consensus on this article and on the whole range of articles for other albums listed at So Fresh - I've chosen this one just as an example. I'm not personally asking for their deletion, but I was recently asked by another editor about creating some of the missing album articles, and I discovered that So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2011 was deleted as a result of WP:Articles for deletion/So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2011. It seems to me that either the whole series is notable, or the whole series is not notable, and they should either all be accepted or all deleted - it doesn't seem to make sense to me for individual notability to be needed on an album-by-album basis if the series itself is notable. So, opinions please. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted by User:Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) →Bmusician 09:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article reads like a how-to guide or instruction manual, violating WP:NOTHOWTO. jfd34 (talk) 14:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No evidence presented of meeting WP:GNG joe deckertalk to me 19:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Regional Australian soccer club that competes in the "Central Coast Premier League 1". Fails WP:FOOTYN, as far as I can see. --sparkl!sm hey! 12:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect per nominator's approval. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability. JoelWhy (talk) 12:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete JamesBWatson (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable and written like an advert Yasht101 11:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#G11, unambiguously promotional material. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very badly written (though this is not the reason to delete it), it is like an advert and fails WP:GNG Yasht101 11:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedied G1 by Kwamikagami (G1: Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible: no sources, apparent invention). Housekeeping closure. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about something that does not exist. The only real evidence for Curonian is substrate data and there is not even enough of that to definitively say whether it was even Baltic, let alone to reconstruct some grammar for it. --Taivo (talk) 10:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I will be willing to userfy on request, or alternatively to undelete if she wins an election. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Subject's only claim to fame is that of being an unsuccessful political candidate. Her race should not be an issue. As per numerous discussions at WP:AUSTRALIA, including this one, this doesn't demonstrate sufficient notability. AussieLegend (talk) 10:07, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I find this to not be notable, in particular, it does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. The sources cited do not go in depth about the subject. Ducknish (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found no notability for this software. SL93 (talk) 20:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Qualifies for speedy deletion (A7), quite apart from the fact that there is clear consensus here. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not appear to be about a notable subject. GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 21:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Small town Mayor with no coverage in reliable sources. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless there are sources indicating a notability outside the elected position, this subject appears non notable. Stormbay (talk) 00:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 11:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No evidence of getting near meeting the notability guidelines. TerriersFan (talk) 20:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Small town Mayor without coverage in third party sources. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless there are sources indicating a notability outside the elected position, this subject appears non notable. Stormbay (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 01:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Small town mayor without coverage in third party sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 22:20, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless there are sources indicating a notability outside the elected position, this subject appears non notable. Stormbay (talk) 00:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 12:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"This article does not cite any references or sources" without results in google except wikipedia/single facebook hit. Hoax? Bulwersator (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, see reasoning here. This article is about a not notable software product. Extensive online searches for independent, reliable sources which cover this topic to any depth turned up only: promotional material; fluffy press releases; self-published information; and a facebook page. There is one interlanguage link in the article (de:Arcavias) which contains one reference (in Dutch German, I assume) which appears to be nothing more than a vague description (probably also self-published). So, my search for good sources found nothing. Frankly the subject of this article does not meet the general notability guidelines; is unverifiable; has no reliable sources; and seems here only to promote; therefore, I propose deletion. WTucker (talk) 00:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The well-known German computer publishing house Heise (printing the most read computer magazine in the German-speaking area) published a news about Arcavias. Heise is part of the main stream press and their journalists wouldn't add news about software to their website that is not worth noting. Unfortunately, the news is only in German so it wasn't referenced in the English Wikipedia --Nsendetzky (talk) 08:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
“ | Arcavias is the new e-commerce framework that presents the Hamburg software company Metaways at CeBIT in Hall 2, D58 (121). It is both the manufacturer to build performant web shops and online catalogs. For integration into Typo3 is under construction. The programmed in PHP5 Framework is released under the GPLv3, the sources are available in a Subversion repository for download. (mid) | ” |
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article previously deleted via PROD in 2009, and recent PROD was declined. The article is entirely written "in-universe", spans several works of fiction in the franchise which already have articles, and is largely a plot summary of those articles. MSJapan (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It should be noted that while many gang films have been produced only a few have reached the notoriety and publicity of such films as The Warriors (1979), Colors (1988), Boyz N the Hood (1991), and New Jack City (1991) have received. ...
The movie follows nine members of a gang-the Warriors-as they travel from Coney Island to the Bronx to attend a grand meeting of NYC youth gangs.
... via his father in a wrongful death action, and Jocelyn Vargas, along with her mother, brought lawsuits against the par- ties they believed should be held responsible for injuries caused by third parties who had viewed the gang-related motion pictures The Warriors and Boulevard ...
The bad side of gangs was depicted in the film The Warriors. ...
... If I were a guy I would be macho, be self-reliant … I would punch them out! 2. I wish in my life I weren't so afraid—as I usually am. I wasn't afraid anymore [watching the movie]. I was rooting for the Warriors gang.
... Hill's antagonists are a lordly, if illiterate, gang of juvenile delinquents, "The Warriors," and the film, shortly summarized, enacts their efforts, during one night, simply to "get home," safely, to Coney Island from the Bronx, by way of the subway
... Urban turf also plays a principal role in The Warriors (1979). At an assembly in upper Manhattan of the city's Warriors, a gang from a beachside area of Brooklyn, end up being falsely accused of assassinating a charismatic who has called an assembly of all the gangs in New ...
... In March 1979, a gang film called The Warriors was released by Paramount with the following ad: "These are the Armies of the Night. They are 100,000 strong. They outnumber the cops five to one. They could run New York City. ...
..."The Warriors" depicts juvenile gang violence. Advertisements targeted at a high school market portrayed menacing youths wielding baseball bats. After a showing in California, two youths were killed near theaters exhibiting the film. ...
... In Walter Hill's movie The Warriors, a small band of street hoods is accused of assassinating the leader of New York's most powerful gang during a citywide meeting somewhere uptown. The ifim follows this gang, the Warriors, as it tries to return to its home base in Brooklyn. ...
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Like an story, unreferenced, notability not established and like an original research Yasht101 06:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 19:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about an online legal service, just containing PR. Corresponding tags were removed by main contributor. Polmandc (talk) 05:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The description of this article as "just containing PR" makes no sense to me - no press releases or company web sites are referenced in the article and every statement is backed by a reliable third-party source. Rocket Lawyer's business model and services are interesting and unique enough that the New York Times, Forbes, Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, SmartMoney, and many others wrote articles on it. Given the quality and volume of mainstream press coverage from business-savvy journalists, I'd describe this as a neutral, well-referenced article on a notable company, not PR. Keep. Catavar (talk) 07:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A "House music producer and DJ". Has released one self-published mixed tape. No reliable references to be found, only social network sites. Fails WP:NMUSIC. Prod was contested for unknown reasons. Bgwhite (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per G7, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any meaningful coverage in reliable sources. No notability per WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. West Eddy (talk) 03:18, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you think it should be deleted sure, just thought it would be good to have on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therealbigredman (talk • contribs) 04:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable (United States) Army office. I dug up two articles via Highpoint Research but they are both from in-house military publications, so they were basically press releases. No mainstream coverage could be found. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 00:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The only "keep" opinion does not address the criteria required for notability as Wikipedia understands it, i.e., coverage in reliable sources. Sandstein 12:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable software. Was deprodded with the justification "pyglet is one of the well known 3d toolkits for python (and one of the most known ) , there are quite a few articles about it http://steveasleep.com/pyglettutorial or more recent http://greendalecs.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/3d-programming-in-python-p" but those are blogs/personal web sites, not reliable sources and a search turns up more of the same, while there are none in the article. No indication either why it's notable; just something started then abandoned by one person two years ago which has since not been continued by anyone. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 15:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your general criticisms, but Pyglet is still under active development (albeit a little short on packaged releases at present).
With regards to notability, Pyglet is mentioned by several books (http://www.amazon.com/Python-Multimedia-Beginners-Ninad-Sathaye/dp/1849510164/ and http://www.amazon.com/Hello-Python-Anthony-S-Briggs/dp/1935182080/ for example), and is regularly used to produce entries for short-duration programming contests, such as ludum dare (http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/tag/pyglet/).
Swiftcoder (talk) 00:52, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article has failed to meet WP:GNG for over 3 years, and there is not even an article for the game's publisher to merge into. Ducknish (talk) 23:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems a little promotional, but not quite bad enough for a CSD. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated the page including some related work and external references. This is work in which several standardisation organisations were involved including W3C: http://www.w3.org/ns/adms. Stijngoedertier 11:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions 15:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG, only source fails to prove notability, notability has been in dispute for over 3 years. Ducknish (talk) 00:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. I would encouraging following up the suggestion to re-position this as an article about the case rather than the person, and rename appropriately JohnCD (talk) 19:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Person know only for one crime he commited. Travelbird (talk) 01:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be a great lack of reliable sources that can confirm that this film meets our film notability guide. However, given that this seems a Kurdish film, that may be part of the problem of locating sources. Finding sources reasoning similar to that given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akar Araz. Canuck89 »–—►(click here!)◄–—« 04:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn since he has since been named to First All-Star Team. -DJSasso (talk) 11:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable junior player who has yet to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he meets NHOCKEY or otherwise achieves notability. DJSasso (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete - as has been noted below, currently fails WP:BIO. Almost every source is self-published and where it isn't there is no more than a trivial mention of the article's subject (this may not be the case in references 24 and 25 which are behind pay walls but that would still bring it below the WP:GNG guidelines). Though the trivial mentions allude to the large cultural impact of the subject, there are no sources to verify these claims. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article's subject does not meet the guidelines at WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. A Google search does not reveal significant coverage of the subject in reliable third-party sources. →Bmusician 11:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions 13:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The only claim to fame for this lounge seems to be that a lot of celebrities go here, and placed need more than that to be notable (otherwise even a McD's on Hollywood would qualify for notability) D O N D E groovily Talk to me 12:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Shobiz Experiential Communications appears to fail Wikipedia:CORP. As an alternative, I would suggest that it may possibly be redirected to its parent companies, which appear to have an online presence as either Eventfaqs.com and/or Exhibitoronline.com but do not have articles as of 01 May 2012 Shirt58 (talk) 12:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete without prejudice. Can be recreated or restored upon request at WP:REFUND. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band. No coverage in reliable, independent sources; no obvious elements of a notable band as described in WP:BAND Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An article listing The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology for a year where no award were awarded in that category... yeah... Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect is a very unlikely search term. The proper redirect would be something similar to 1974 Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined), not The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1974). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted (by Smalljim). Peridon (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:ACTOR. No significant independent coverage of the person or his "books." (In fact, I cannot find any coverage of his books.) Has a YouTube channel and that's about it. Article is also written in an annoying style that capitalizes the first letter of every word (which happens to be the writing style of the person himself: see here). A massive violation of MOS. Michitaro (talk) 00:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable short film. Coverage of the short story, and of the adaptation of the story into a play, but nothing of the short film. Fails GNG and WP:MOVIE. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 16:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No outside sources proving notability, fails WP:GNG Ducknish (talk) 20:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Nail (anatomy). Sandstein 05:57, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel like this meets WP:GNG, in particular, there is not significant coverage of this subject. Ducknish (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Toronto Raptors. Rlendog (talk) 14:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merger into Toronto Raptors since the mascot is not independently notable. Salimfadhley (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mascot of NBA team which backups up notability, The Raptor also fits in to the "culture and lore" category of the Toronto Raptors team navbox and whatnot.
The result was merge. Rlendog (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merge into Dallas Mavericks as the subject(s) of this article do not seem to be independently notable of the team they represent. Salimfadhley (talk) 20:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions 15:43, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NWEB Ducknish (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notable for a crime which was not well-documented, thereby failing WP:GNG, and fails other criteria at WP:CRIME. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 21:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirected (non admin close). Sven Manguard Wha? 15:34, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merge into Scandal (Japanese band) - this song does not seem to have any independent notability from the band that performed it. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirected, by non-admin. Respect my non-authoritah! Sven Manguard Wha? 15:34, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person. The article fails to mention that the "Women's Hall of Fame" in question is the San Diego County Women's Hall of Fame. (See [29]). The stated mission of this hall of fame is to highlight women of San Diego County. This seems too limited a scope of "fame" to make for a notable biography. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mayor of a Finnish town of 131,000 people without any coverage in third party sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Unless there are sources indicating a notability outside the elected position, this subject appears non notable. The size of the town may add importance to the position (hence the "weak"). I will watch for stronger sources. Stormbay (talk) 00:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Some references have been suggested - I'll say Weak Keep Stormbay (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This character isn't notable, and dosen't appear to have any coverage outside of the comic books themselves. Perhaps a merge into List of Celestials is in order? Sven Manguard Wha? 00:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not provide a picture of a ribbon. In addition, it mentions a person which has no references to it whatsoever. The article is completely underdeveloped and can only be saved by an immense overhaul. The whole article is redundant and does not explain anything of significant value. I will be likely to change my opinion if someone provided an image of a ribbon of such characteristics, but since the article is very short, I feel that it should be deleted. WeirdnSmart0309 (talk) 00:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I will make a DAB page, as suggested, within a day or two. JohnCD (talk) 20:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NONPROFIT. West Eddy (talk) 00:04, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]