< August 30 | September 1 > |
---|
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 02:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reason for notability of this application given. Google gives ~470 hits ([1]) but some are about a different program, and practically all the others are just links to various download sites. I don't see any substantial secondary coverage. Black Kite 23:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article has no reliable sources to establish the notability of a small music magazine. Harro5 23:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An unreferenced stub that appears to be original research about a sub-genre of music. The article says this name may not be recognised in the 'mainstream', and finishes "It very closely relates to a form of electronic music called Microhouse. Some would argue it is indistinguishable." Harro5 22:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it. It's not real and it's made up. Besides, it's another name for microhouse. Noble12345 (talk) 23:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An article that does not establish WP:WEB notability. The only reliable source listed in a TechCrunch page mentioning the future launch of the website; others are personal blogs or soccer fan sites. Harro5 22:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails all criteria under WP:BIO. Wronkiew (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Mr.Z-man 21:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Football who has never played in a fully professional league (latest info is that he may get a place in the reserve team of a club at the 10th level in England!), thus failing WP:ATHLETE. Was prodded, but as usual, it was removed by an IP without explanation. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper ǀ 76 17:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted (G11/A7) as spam / non-notable. Salted as well. Black Kite 23:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable company or service provider; content continually reintroduced (might suggest a bit of protection?) A bot has also tagged it as a blatant copyvio of http://tutor4u.me.uk/aboutus.html. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 20:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Richard Pinch (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Jerry Bruckheimer. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pilot TV show that never was (on a network that hardly was). Completely fails WP:N, completely lacks multiple independent reliable sources (probably because of the lack of any significance or notability).
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be a non-notable piece of software. The article is sourced to blogs, and Google turns up many more; plus I found one review on a download site [2]; but I don't think that suffices to warrant an article. Note that the article was created by User:Bostondave, while the software's creator is called David and apparently located near Boston [3]. PROD was contested. B. Wolterding (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed by author. Non-notable artist, per WP:MUSIC. No independent coverage--sources are myspace, bulletin boards, self-generated (not WP:RS). justinfr (talk/contribs) 20:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Mr.Z-man 21:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. No context, no lead section. It is unclear whether this article is about a living person, a deity, a village, or something else. Delete as WP:NONSENSE. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 20:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Mr.Z-man 21:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PROD contested by author, total lack of WP:RS for WP:V ... violatesWP:CRYSTAL. — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk · contribs) 19:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There's no indication in the article that it passes WP:PROF Steven J. Anderson (talk) 19:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also nominating the following related pages:
These movies seem to all be non-notable because I can't find any reliable sources that shows the movies' notability (except one review). Schuym1 (talk) 23:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(fixed template Bvlax2005 (talk) 00:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Deleted and salted. jj137 (talk) 23:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional article, twice speedied G11, twice recreated, listed here so that it can be salted. The creator has also been reported at WP:UAA. Delete and salt. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 19:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. Mr.Z-man 01:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. Not even worth a redirect to Spice Girls, as she's hardly the equivelant of the Fifth Beatle. Dalejenkins | 19:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination in response to re-PROD of previously PROD/de-PROD'd article. The most recent PROD nominator stated "fails WP:MUSIC", while the first PROD nominator stated simply "notability"; the remover of the first PROD stated "charting artist meets WP:MUSIC". User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Mr.Z-man 21:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails to meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines because there are no reliable third-party sources that can verify the contents of this article. Randomran (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), Closed as per WP:SNOWBALL - Its obvious which way this is going. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 13:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. See additional closing rationale on talk page. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 03:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails to meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines because there are no reliable third-party sources that can verify the contents of this article. None are in the article, and other sources fail to meet their requirements for reliability or independence. Randomran (talk) 19:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. due to few reliable sources and lack of evidence of passing WP:MUSIC. Also written promotionally. Band is now defunct. However, I am going to userfy this to my own space and try to rewrite it if I can find enough material - there does appear to be *some* RS out there. Black Kite 13:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band. This article has been lying around for several months. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 19:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Mr.Z-man 21:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to List of Crash Bandicoot characters. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails to meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines because there are no reliable third-party sources that can verify the contents of this article. (I previously tagged the article for speedy deletion, but it was disputed.) Randomran (talk) 19:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The "Pre-1930" version of this list has already been deleted. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bildungsroman examples (pre-1930) noit (talk) 18:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Mr.Z-man 21:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
New Zealand drag contest. All refs in google news seem to be local and possibly selfpub. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Mr.Z-man 22:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Young footballer who has never played in a fully professional league, thus failing WP:ATHLETE. Was prodded, but removed because he has played for Scotland U19. However, consensus has long been that, with the exception of the Olympics, youth caps do not confer notability. Article has already been deleted via prod once for same reason. пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Young footballer who has never played in a fully professional league, therefore failing WP:ATHLETE. Originally prodded, but removed by IP without explanation. пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been deleted a number of times on this title and at Elexia hilton as hoax/vandalism but the person does seem to exist. Blatant self-promotion. Is she/he notable? — RHaworth (Talk
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
this cites no source apart from a just-issued magazine, and I can find no reliable confirmation. Nothing in IMDb. Fails WP:NFF. (Argument from JohnCD on removed prod) This entry also fails WP:CRYSTAL. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 16:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have requested semi-protection as the article is being heavily vandalised and the AfD template removed by a number of IPs. JohnCD (talk) 13:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Non notable future single. Fails WP:CRYSTAL. Please note that It Was You also has an article as the second single off that album. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 16:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should have stayed. No need to delete just because it's not much used. Software detailed not notable; just another commercial product for creating images of disks Cupids wings (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Newly-created article. There is a possible WP:COI with the article's creator, many of whose edits have been to promote Vargas-Bernal, but in the absence of a clear violation of WP:AUTO the more important reason for the nomination is that the subject looks unlikely to pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Due to the lack of coverage in reliable sources for verification and notability Davewild (talk) 20:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't quite tell whether or not this is a hoax, but a Google search does not turn up any sources that would verify this person's existence or the information in the article. I do not think that it is unreasonable to assume that a person with the qualities listed in the article would have at least a few English Google hits; I am willing to reconsider the nomination if sources are provided, but I would have to see how trivial the coverage is and if it establishes proper notability. Cheers, CP 16:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unnotable mathemitician who fails WP:BIO. Article is purely the original research/creation of its creator, who copy/pasted it from his own webpage. Wikipedia is not a mirror nor is it a personal web host for people to archive their website or publish their own research papers. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was under the impression that in-text citations have been added already. Katzmik (talk) 11:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable. 'Nuff said. --C S (talk) 02:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. In addition to the comments made, his influence on Harikathe in Karnataka is also cited in Encyclopaedia of Indian literature. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 07:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable religious leader, narrator. Also, there are no reliable sources that confer notability. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non notable, unverifiable buzzword spam/neologism. completely unreferenced despite being tagged as such since may and fails to even assert notability. created by owner of vendor Enomalism (also nominated) who claims to have coined the term. user warned for conflict of interest. should have been speedied already and probably would have if it referenced Enomalism directly. internet search results are the author himself and/or not notable too. WikiScrubber (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article appears to consist entirely of original research (not to mention copyvios, though there's always some confusion of the copyright status of graffiti at IFD).Take that back, there is freedom of panorama in Australia. I can't find any sources suggesting that this particular graffiti is notable. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 20:42, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any reliable sources that show the book's notability. Schuym1 (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. There's clearly a difference of opinion about how sources prove the notability of the website. There's no consensus either way, so the default move is to close as no consensus. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 19:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:WEB - Two working sources are given, both of which mention the website, but neither of which have the site as more than a passing mention. In addition, this page makes an interesting read. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The result was delete. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Australian football (soccer) club. Does not and has never played in the A-League, but in a regional league organized by the Broome Soccer Association. No coverage to be found, 14 ghits in total. Fails WP:NOTE. AmaltheaTalk 13:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Google gives two hit, both related to this article. No need to transwiki. Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 13:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Considered merge, but the article was entirely unreferenced and contained very little encyclopedic content. I am willing to userfy this article to any editor who in good faith would like to merge content. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable and quickly obsolesced commercial product. No claim of notability offered in article; no references provided to substantiate notability. Mikeblas (talk) 12:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Motorola MPx200. Information can be covered in a section of this article. Sebwite (talk) 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above. WikiScrubber (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 03:27, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Quickly-obsolesced commercial product. No claim to notability offered in article; no references used to establish notability. Wikipedia is not a cell phone guide. Wikipedia is not a Motorola product catalog. Mikeblas (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as most probable hoax, and for lack of usable content anyway. -- lucasbfr talk 12:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable subject, probably a hoax. A google search of "Spanky language" with or without quotes give one relevant hit that I can find. That one is to a website that requires registration. Also, this is not a language it is only a different way of speaking English. Jons63 (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete by Firsfron as G1, patent nonsense. (non-admin closure). Cunard (talk) 20:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable vanity page for a game-player Oddharmonic (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non notable, unverifiable advert created by company owner. probably should have been speedied already as spam (G11); also does not even attempt to claim subject is notable (A7). warning user for conflict of interest. WikiScrubber (talk) 11:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. It has been discussed in detail that the Dutch wikipedia deleted this article. Sister projects have their own policies and guidelines for notability and their local wiki consensus is likely different than ours on many matters. Although if another wiki has researched a matter and has a viewable page with coherent and relevant information to the discussion at hand, it is obviously helpful to reference such a discussion. But we do not generally ignore our own consensus-forming processes and blindly follow what a sister project has done without reevaluating the details against our own policies and guidelines. So for this to be the central argument for deletion here, is quite problematic. Several wikipedians (as well as the subject himself) have offered reasonable evidence that the subject is at least marginally notable under WP:Music, and so I find keeping the article is the reasonable thing to do. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Some people are interwiki spamming the article about this Dutch musician who has no encyclopedic value. He is at the most localy famous in his town or gemeente. It was decided on the Dutch Wikipedia a long time ago by a majority that this man was not encyclopedic but the people who thought/think he was/is didn't stop there, now they do things like this. Jorrit-H (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Seventh-day Adventist academies and elementary schools#Puerto Rico, as merging has already taken place. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List containing only contact information for external schools, with no internal wiki links whatsoever. Originally G11 tagged but the creator removed the phone and website info (And the G11). Doesn't fall under G11 anymore, but it is still not the kind of page to keep around. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 09:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dubious sources seem to mask an advert for a product. Listing ticket prices is a clear indication of a lack of notability. Harro5 09:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, as blatant advertising (WP:CSD#G11). AngelOfSadness talk 15:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Little or no encyclopedic info created by a User:Finam in self interest. No clear assertion of notability other than as a private holding. Looks like an advert and as it is at present not suitable for wikipedia. A quick google search shows that it could certianly be a notable article in Russian financing but at present it is far from having the content and text that a proper article on it should. The Bald One White cat 09:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Game show contestant only really notable for this event. No third party references or sources to support a claim to notability. Suggest a redirect per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hansen Nichols / Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bugoy Bogayan. Since the prod was contested, the redirect would likely be removed as well, so bringing here for consensus opinion. CultureDrone (talk) 09:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While this may sound like an official body, it is not; rather, it is a six-man show trying to change how Foster Care works. They have no Google News results and the first 30 pages of a regular search show nothing in the nature of a WP:RS. As such I don't think that this organization meets the inclusion requirements at WP:ORG or the verifiability requirements at WP:V.
The author, User:Afterfostercare, is Mr. John F. Dunn, who had his own article deleted three times for various reasons. While he has at all times been courteous and well-meaning, unfortunately his edits bear the hallmarks of a single-purpose account with a conflict of interest, and judging from his recent message to me, he is trying to use Wikipedia as a directory or soapbox. I have taken his name off of the John Dunn dab page and I think most of the links to his website are gone at this stage.
Finally, although an A7 speedy may be appropriate here, I would appreciate taking the five days to go through the discussion and finally close the matter Stifle (talk) 08:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Benedictum. Insufficient notability for a seperate article but is an appropriate redirect Davewild (talk) 20:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Google search turned up one interview with subject to work with for WP:RS. There isn't enough to support a separate article for this singer. Fails WP:BIO. Movingboxes (talk) 08:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Fails WP:MUSIC and general standards for verifiability when dealing with biographical articles. Lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 08:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MOVIE. Not yet released, with a non-notable distribution company. Edward Payson, the director, is a blue link--but the article is about a different person entirely. Amber Rose could be any one of three people. Nobody else associated with the film appears to have any notability. Of the several "source," every one is a horror blog type site, and they restate the exact same information, apparently originating from a common press release. The film "is said" to be playing at some festivals (non-specified) before going on to dvd release. Movingboxes (talk) 07:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NN, if she's most notable for formerly being married to a celebrity, that's not notable enough to have an article. Ckessler (talk) 07:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete - article was a hoax. GDonato (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Possible hoax, cannot find any mention of this in Google Somno (talk) 07:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines Davewild (talk) 21:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable youth player. The only external source I found is this. So he might be his youth team's most valuable player, but that's it. Seems as if the article was started by his father or himself, btw. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 07:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 00:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The information seems to be from the primary source of the term, Edward de Bono, and not from sources independent of Edward de Bono. Others have used the term "lateral thinking", but the article seems to be de Bono's views on lateral thinking, which should be sourced to third party material, not de Bono's material, and can be included in Edward de Bono rather than a separate article. Suntag (talk) 07:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article presents no substantial coverage that the game may have had from independent, reliable sources (WP:N), or references of any kind (WP:V). With only 400 ghits for "team mitei" (the usual directory entries, download sites, etc) I find it unlikely that it passes notability guidelines at this time. Marasmusine (talk) 10:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. —— RyanLupin • (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable baseball player yet to reach the majors. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable baseball player yet to reach the majors. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's hammer time! Tavix (talk) 05:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently a hoax. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Possible_vanity_article_and_autobiography. Has been deleted from the Spanish Wikipedia as a hoax, nothing in the German Wikipedia, no reliable sources that she even exists. Corvus cornixtalk 04:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was moved discussion to RfD. Non-admin close. Reyk YO! 05:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. As Ave Caesar points out, ghits are not an adequate criteria for establishing notability. SmashvilleBONK! 05:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This guy is the REAL threat to the 1%!
The result was merge to Bridgeport, Connecticut. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 18:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for non-notability and for being a possible hoax. Google search turned up irrelevent hits only. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 04:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy/Snowball Keep per proven notability and consensus through the discussion. The article does need come cleanup, which would avoid it from being mistakenly taken for a neologism and being nominated again. (non-admin closure). RedThunder 11:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article focuses on a neologism that has been tagged onto many mainstream/popular rock groups by a handful of music critics. It is poorly referenced, and seems to rely heavily on original research. Ibaranoff24 (talk) 03:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable porn actress per WP:PORNBIO. Tosqueira (talk) 03:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 03:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article focuses on a supposed documentary that turns up limited results on Google, and, to top it off, focuses on a neologism used to describe any popular rock band. Ibaranoff24 (talk) 03:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. TravellingCari 17:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PROD removed without explanation or improvements to the article. Both Google and the Association of Tennis Professionals official website came up with absolutely nothing related to this player. Non-notable player, unable to verify anything in the article. Beeblbrox (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Submitted anonymously, untouched for over 2 years, looks like a prank. Does "The Geologist" even exist? Not at List_of_scientific_journals_in_earth_and_atmospheric_sciences#Geology --tcsetattr (talk / contribs) 03:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Weak Keep- I did manage to find something on Monastic remains from reputable or civilian sources. This page does need MAJOR rewriting, however. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There was an AfD on pt-wiki pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/Thammy Miranda and although most of the people voted for deletion, the article was kept (because the deletion decisions on pt-wiki depend on the number of votes not consensus and it's necessary 2/3 of the votes to delete). It's only one of the Gretchen's daughters. Not notable per WP:BIO, neither WP:ENTERTAINER nor WP:PORNBIO. Tosqueira (talk) 03:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article is unsourced, similar to the hoax created at Canadian Vintage Leaf Flag. The article sources do not even mention about this "heritage" leaf and are just random links to hockey sites. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I left the one link [71] to show that Hockey Canada will continue to use in its words "the all-important Hockey Canada heritage logo" which uses the Heritage Leaf. It has also been called and sold as the Vintage Leaf [72], but Hockey Canada has officially designated it as indicated. Not sure what further information is needed to maintain the article - any help in preventing deletion and not just criticism would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Likemike1 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 03:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:CORP. Small New York personal injury law firm, makes no claim to notability with regards to number of attorneys or other personnel, dollar amount of revenues, famous lawyers practicing there, or anything else that the rest of the law firm articles on Wikipedia should have. See Category:Law firms of the United States and look at some of the articles in there to understand what I mean. Eastlaw (talk) 03:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This artist fails WP:MUSIC and lacks non-trivial coverage from multiple third party publications. There was a stint of news related to an attempted robbery, but nothing substantial. JBsupreme (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 07:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Only claim to notability is that she finished ahead of Sarah Palin in a beauty contest. Not notable by herself. Cogswobbletalk 02:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
From my understanding of WP:BIO, a person should have multiple reliable, independent, and secondary sources that offer non-trivial coverage of that person for an article on Wikipedia to exist about the subject. All the sources that I have found that mention Castro, including the source that is cited in the article, are football reports which state that he was a referee for the matches they are reporting on. I believe this is trivial coverage of the person, and I do not believe this article meets WP:BIO as a result. Thank you for reading. JEdgarFreeman (talk) 00:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 04:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article appears to be original research, drawing original conclusions from existing material. Prod removed without comment by creator without comment or change. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
According to WP:NEO: "A new term doesn't belong in Wikipedia unless there are reliable sources specifically about the term — not just sources which mention it briefly or use it in passing." This article fails that guideline. There are no citations at all (therefore failing WP:V), and the two external links are editorials that use the neologism "Moynihan's Law," without attempting academic discussion of it. I did a Google search, and didn't come up with anything substantive that could save this article. *** Crotalus *** 00:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 02:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable term. Although it is obviously possible to bind someone by the elbow, there is nothing to suggest tying someone up in this manner deserves separate coverage. WJBscribe (talk) 03:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No references to reliable sources. The "keep" opinions do not address this. Sandstein 16:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable term. Although it is obviously possible to bind someone by their hair, there is nothing to suggest tying someone up in this manner deserves separate coverage. WJBscribe (talk) 03:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus defaulting to keep. SmashvilleBONK! 05:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested speedy (that is itself a recreation of a speedily deleted article). Chess club for schoolchildren. No assertion of notability, absolutely fails WP:N. Movingboxes (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reardless of systemic bias, there doesn't seem to be anything notable about this person. He was a city administrator, then a sailor? Even if there were reliable sources in English, if that's all that there is to say about him, he doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. Corvus cornixtalk 19:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]