< February 27 | March 1 > |
---|
The result was Speedy delete, WP:CSD#G4 ~ trialsanderrors 03:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is 3rd nom. I think this is speedy recreation of previously deleted material, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Nguyen (Second Nomination) Pete.Hurd 02:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, per WP:SNOW. A Train take the 17:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
De-prodded. Not a major setting of Arrested Development, no Springfield Elementary School. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 00:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Valente is of borderline notability at best. Additionally, current version reads very much like a promotional biography, though ruthless editing can alleviate this. jredmond 00:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:34Z
According to web site very small cluster of schools - Non-notable. No case made for notability - yet another martual art style created by somebody. Peter Rehse 00:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g7, blanked by author. NawlinWiki 03:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I speedy deleted this under WP:CSD#A7; it has been challenged, so I'm sending it here for more discussion. Chick Bowen 00:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. NawlinWiki 01:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Filing a frivolous lawsuit that was dismissed does not constitute notablity as far as I can see. Delete. DMG413 00:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Closing per WP:SNOW. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 21:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notibility is questionable. I get hits on google outside wikipedia for this person, what do you think? BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 00:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete NawlinWiki 02:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability not established, autobiography, resurrection of the material speedy deleted per A7 Alex Bakharev 01:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 09:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A category (particularly Category:Jerusalem) could handle the job this article is currently performing. -- tariqabjotu 01:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:31Z
Band with no assertion of meeting WP:MUSIC in the article. There is a vague assertion on the talkpage, but it isn't verified and I was not able to verify it. This is a recreation of something I previously deleted so I guess technically it could go WP:CSD#G4 but I figured I'd give it the benefit of a community review. My opinion is delete.--Isotope23 02:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete - NYC JD (make a motion) 20:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Adds no value over the associated category, will never be complete, fails the guidelines at WP:LIST Delete Steve (Slf67) talk 02:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. NawlinWiki 02:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly notable former Idol contestant. Pisspoor article which utterly fails WP:RS. The only sources appear to be interviews with same, but principally chat and idol forum postings. I always find it amusing that this sort of articles frequently say "started singing at an early age", inherently unproveable, yet implying some sort of prodigious talent. I've tidied it up somewhat, but I think this is a pretty hopeless article and we might as well start from scratch. Delete, without prejudice to re-creation if properly sourced. Ohconfucius 02:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RobOnWikipedia (talk • contribs) 17:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
The result was delete. I've disregarded 216.54.173.172 as a single-purpose account and 66.194.114.163 as a vandal. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Former Idol contestant. Article which appears to fail WP:RS. Although she may have a role in a film to be released, only time will tell if she is notable. Ohconfucius 02:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Heartbreak Station. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:28Z
Doesn't seem to have any notability in and of itself; possibly redirect to Heartbreak Station Veinor (talk to me) 03:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn on the condition that the article be merged into Hillside Lake, New York in accordance with WP:LOCAL. --Polaron | Talk 04:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of article does not meet guidelines for notability per WP:LOCAL. County roads are not inherently notable and no assertion of notability is given. Nv8200p talk 03:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. NawlinWiki 02:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We are not a dictionary. —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity bio, fails WP:BIO. Creator also repeatedly spammed Ayn Rand with promo links. Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:26Z
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
A webgame that doesn't appear to meet WP:WEB and doesn't contain information attributable to reliable sources. The three sources provided are a forum link, a weblog, and an unattributed review (I'm guessing user-submitted). search doesn't bring up reliable sources. Wafulz 03:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe, that information is not documented enough, maybe you could place the same warning as for the Vietnam War? Rafkory 20:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"The distinguished staff of TIGSource are a varied lot, culled from all over cyberspace to bring you all your indie gaming news, all the time.
Want to join the elite ranks of volunteers? Just pop me an e-mail telling me why you're fit to be a TIGSource editor. Probably the easiest way to get accepted to TIGSource is to have good writing skills - just because we're casual and fun doesn't mean that we type like monkeys! The second is enthusiasm. You gotta love indie games. Both should be reflected in your e-mail, so don't slouch!"
They may not be proffessional but they are an independent source and quite numerous. The main fact we're trying to get across is that this game does not have major recognition but does have unbaised reviews from external sources. Provided this page continues to exist we will continue updating and trying to gain more "appropriate" reviews for more distinguished sources. But you must understand that if you kill this site from the start than we'll barely have the chance to do so. Also Haemo, "obvious reasons" isn't a phrase I particularly like, these guides are very wordy and difficult to translate into real english. If you would care to properly articulate why this latest reference is unworthy, it would be appreciated. --Jester
Rafkory 11:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nowehere near notable enough for a web game as far as I'm concerned, sources are in no way reliable, only arguement for keeping appears to be WP:ILIKEIT and self-promotional reasons, and the article is riddled with game guidey and how-to-play information, which violates WP:NOT. The Kinslayer 11:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Despite many polite requests the article still has no reliable sources to support the notability claimed. Nuttah68 13:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this oddly feels like a continuation or expansion of the recent slate of afd's for various webcomics. if that is deliberate or accidental is a completely different debate. however, from what i have been able to glean from those debates, the afd should be the _second step_ after a request for sources hasn't been met. but, somebody will probably say if such is formal policy or just basic politeness. so base question, was that formal request for sources even made, or did somebody just light the primer cord on the article without even making the cursory attempt to start the process to fix it. 70.51.53.37 14:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC) steuben (fixing my spelling)[reply]
Comment WP:WEB is an invalid arguement in this case. tinywarz is a game not a website. it is a game that happens to played through <insert browser here>. if tinywarz was played through a downloaded and separate client then the WP:WEB arguement would not apply. so by extenstion neither does the WP:WEB here. unless Wafulz would like to expand on reasons for including the wp:web argument.70.51.53.37 16:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)steuben[reply]
I would also just like to comment that, despite assertions to the contrary, this AFD has been linked to from the TinyWarz wiki http://wiki.mobrulestudios.com/index.php?title=Main_Page by a developer. So, I would suggest tagging SPA's as they arise. On the plus side, the TinyWarz page has apparently also been TransWiki'd to their personal Wiki, so we can avoid having to do that. --Haemo 16:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable church; only possible claim is the 'largest parish', which doesn't have a source. Veinor (talk to me) 03:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
writers note typo at official cometary website (accessed 28 02 07) -- sorry too tired to fix in text notes tonight. --Kevin Murray 07:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was REDIRECT to Poser. Yuser31415 06:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We are not a dictionary. —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:22Z
Looks like an advert more then anything to me, I don't know if the subject of this is notable or not, "airing" as far as england does not impress me, especially as it is sourced. —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Beg for Mercy. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:21Z
Is this song notable? —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We are not a dictionary. —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:20Z
I can't seem to find many good reliable sources for this other than the IMDB entry; I'm personally kinda weak on this one, though. Veinor (talk to me) 03:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:20Z
I cannot find any reason why this is notable. —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:19Z
Doesn't many any mention of notability besides the vague "played host to some of the finest Drum n Bass stars of the time". Veinor (talk to me) 03:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Yuser31415 06:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article about a former Idol contestant still apparently awaiting a record deal. She has apparently made some appearances post Idol, but which were not outside the context of Idol. No singles, no nationwide tours. Online press articles are a mixture of show marketing, and trivial mentions. Ohconfucius 03:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, obvious hoax. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:18Z
Blatant crystal-balling; movie is part of a trilogy that is "initiating in 2015". Google produces 0 hits for the full name of the movie, "Writing on the Wall: The Curse of the Dead Locket", and for "Writing on the Wall" "Johnny Depp" "Madison Mott" (alleged star and director, respectively). No IMDB link provided, even. The writing on the wall is clear for stuff like this: delete. Awyong J. M. Salleh 03:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Transwiki not necessary; Wiktionary already has an entry. Mangojuicetalk 17:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We are not a dictionary. (Sorry about the many afd nominations, I'm going through Category:stubs, tagging what is good, deleting, or nominating here). —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:16Z
Per the inclusion criteria at WP:WEB. No claim of notability, no citations to third-party reliable sources. (also the related article Video Game Show: Show Notes) -- JeremyA (talk) 03:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:16Z
we are not a dictionary. (Sorry about the many afd nominations, I'm going through Category:stubs, tagging what is good, deleting, or nominating here). —— Eagle101 Need help? 04:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Badly maintained, incomplete list that replicates existing category Delete Steve (Slf67) talk 04:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:10Z
Bandcruft - not released anything yet, speculations about future release (crytall ball), prod removed without explanation. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 04:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG Keep! This is a Metal Supergroup with Radio airplay already, Cover stories and many sites.
The result was Redirect to HELLYEAH (at least until album is released). —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:12Z
Unreleased album by a non-notable group (in essense, speculation about their first album). Oh, and this crytalballing cruft is unreferenced, too. Prod removed without explanation. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (music).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 04:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 04:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not meet notability criteria ubiquity 04:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Showgirl - The Homecoming Tour. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:09Z
Is this show notable, and or watched by a large enough group of people? At minimum it needs some sources. —— Eagle101 Need help? 04:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, though the article has large issues (e.g. citations) that need to be fixed. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:08Z
Incomplete/broken nom by IP user. No stance at this time -- saberwyn 08:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete/broken nom by IP from 24.77.227.155 Has repeatedly vandalized article and posted AfD twice.--Kittengirlz 09:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:05Z
I am amazed that this article has not been nominated till now. Blatant advertising for a non-notable book which fails WP:BK miserably - criteria 1 to 5. Only notable thing is the person whose name is in the title. Author is non-notable also. —Moondyne 05:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
something else, eh? Searching "Hillary Clinton Nude" give only 11,000-odd GHits. Searching the full title give only around 150 hits. --Haemo 06:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete; According to Amazon.com, a book search on Amazon for the topic "Hillary Clinton" lists this book, "Hillary Clinton Nude," number 3 in relevance among more than 7,000 titles.
The result was delete all. - Mailer Diablo 15:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Trivia. Not encyclopedic. Unsourced. Wikipedia is not a game guide. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. No actual improvement since previous AFD. >Radiant< 08:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep or merge to main articles: Not trivia, I will source it very soon, this isn't an unencyclopedic list, passes WP:NOT as it isn't game guide material, the list just goes on .....Henchman 2000 10:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: In no way is this trivia. Mario Party is about minigames over anything else. Bowsy (review me!) 17:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If these articles cannot be kept, put them on my userspace Henchman 2000 17:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All The Mario Party series of games are indeed notable, but the individual games within Mario Party certainly are NOT. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 14:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Minor wrestling move, "not known by practically anyone" according to the article itself. Redirect is pointless as the term is nonstandard. Even popular DDT variants do not merit breakout articles (with the exception of the brainbuster, which is commonly considered a distinct maneuver). — Gwalla | Talk 05:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:04Z
Contest prod; pub-band with no releases, does not meet MUSIC, delete. --Peta 23:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Yuser31415 06:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like vanity article. Certainly, notability hasn't been shown or proven. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was semi-speedy delete. – Steel 16:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A move used by a backyard wrestler (i.e. an untrained amateur imitating pro wrestling with his buddies). Even popular suplex variants don't merit breakout articles. — Gwalla | Talk 05:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was semi-speedy delete. – Steel 16:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable backyard (untrained amateur) "pro" wrestler. Backyarders are non-notable almost by definition (the only tme they come to anyone's attention is when one of them injures himself in a manner spectacular enough to get a "weird news" article). Google brings up some hits on the name, but none seem to have anything to do with wrestling (actors, mostly). — Gwalla | Talk 06:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:03Z
Entrepreneur bio, possible WP:COI. No independent sources, nothing on Newsbank, unlikely to be notable. ~ trialsanderrors 07:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This looks like his CV, as written by himself or a close associate. Vanity and WP:COI not to mention WP:NPOV. Too much of this stuff swilling around in the encyclopedia. The Boy that time forgot 21:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was transwiki to Wiktionary and delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't seem like this article can be expanded, and has been listed to be Wikified for a while. Looking it up on Google defines it as an order to place an ad in a newspaper or other media - hardly seems significant for Wikipedia, especially if there's no historical background. Maybe better elsewhere, like on Wiktionary, but it doesn't seem to belong here. Kiwizoid 07:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfy per Black Falcon's request. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Huge, unmaintainable mess of a list, where all the blue links are already covered in List of actors from Germany and Category:German actors. List will never be completed, nearly all the red links are German actors who are not popular enough in the English world to merit an article on the English encyclopedia. The English Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for every semi-famous actor of every country in the world..etc.. Usedup 07:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:00Z
This book was put out by self-publisher iUniverse. I could find no independent reviews of it, save a few blog entries. The only incoming link is from Bill James. Amazon sales rank is 298,083. Djrobgordon 07:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:58Z
Young footballer who has been released by Real Madrid without ever making it beyond the youth team. Might sign with another club and become notable in the future but doesn't come anywhere near meeting WP:BIO at the moment ChrisTheDude 08:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:57Z
Non-notable fictional character, possibly a hoax. Fails WP:V and WP:RS. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 08:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also nominating the following page for deletion by the same author about another non-notable fictional character:
NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 08:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Adam Cuerden talk 15:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subject's greatest claim to notability was being the editor of CRACKED Magazine for what appears to be only two issues prior to the magazine being gutted and relaunched. (The subject doesn't even warrant mention in the article for the magazine.) Only other stabs at notoriety are writing a handful of articles for a supermarket tabloid and running a non-notable memorabilia Web site. Article's author is Scott Gosar (a single-purpose account), which seems to violate WP:AUTO/WP:COI Caknuck 08:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SCOTT GOSAR REPLIES: Hey "Gord": It was four issues. Why don't you spend less time worrying about what I'm doing on Wikipedia and more time minding your own affairs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.239.134.188 (talk • contribs)
The result was Merge to Adaptationism. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:57Z
It's an article on a book review by Stephen Jay Gould. While the review itself might make a good example for an article on the famous battle between Gould and Dawkins, I don't think there's much reason to keep this article. Adam Cuerden talk 08:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:55Z
I can't find any evidence of this existence of this person via a google search. Unless some reliable sources are found, doesn't meet Wikipedia:Verifiability. Xyzzyplugh 08:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
author wrote an autobiographical wikipedia entry Csyberblue 08:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:54Z
16-year old who is a member of the Chelsea youth team, not a first team squad member. Doesn't meet WP:BIO guidelines ChrisTheDude 08:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason
The result was delete Adam Cuerden talk 15:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef & non-notable Bennie Noakes 08:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to L.D. 50 (album). —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:49Z
This article is on a non-notable song, all it has is the number of the track on the album and tells us the title - not encyclopedic material at all M3tal H3ad 09:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Previously, the article has been speedily deleted as self-promotion/not establishing notability. The deletion was contested by e-mail, so I am bringing it here; I suggest giving the creator a chance to clean it up. No vote. - Mike Rosoft 09:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is an example of an article that is a candidate for speedy deletion. That is because it is really not an article at all. Ostensibly it is an article about visual art activity. But there is no mention of any visual art activity in the article. Therefore it falls under the heading of patent nonsense. Notability is besides the point. The article is about nothing, therefore it should be deleted. Bus stop 03:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And, to repeat: I think they are doing very good work in the social sphere. The article attributes to them what sounds like a sincere attempt to address homelessness in their area. I give them a lot of credit for attempting to tackle some of the most grievous problems in our midst. I think they should write an article about that work. Properly sourced, that could be a valid article. But mere allusions to artwork, without sources, is in my opinion just speedy deletion material. Bus stop 16:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:47Z
Shameless self-promotion of a non-notable alpha-stage user project. Unreferenced & non-notable. /Blaxthos 10:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:46Z
Unmaintainable list. The category does everything that this list already does, category:Shōjo.
The result was merge to Circumcision. I think, since content was merged back, we may need this around for GFDL purposes. Consensus favors deletion. Mangojuicetalk 18:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article consists almost entirely of quotes from source material. Per WP:NOT#REPOSITORY, Wikipedia should not contain "Mere collections of ... other source material." Jakew 11:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
* Merge back into Circumcision. It was unilaterally spun off anyway. Put it back where it belongs. Avi 18:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:44Z
Appears to be a non-notable band, run by a non-notable musician. Fails WP:MUSIC. This seems to be a vanity page and an advert for musicians to apply to join the band. Jules1975 12:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, though major cleanup is needed. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:43Z
Band with some local notability that fails central criteria of WP:MUSIC. There are some real WP:COI issues here as well - the article is apparently autobiographical (this account is a sock of the page's creator and is a member of the band). A lot of sources are given, but nearly all are either trivial mentions, self-published, or original research. Most of the notabilty claim seems to be built on a slender thread of secondhand connections with other groups that were notable in some way. RJASE1 Talk 14:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello - re: self-published references - I thought the Dr. Demento documentation, or the first (4) references, might be enough to show notability as those are national sources... I would contest there are multiple non-trivial mentions as the group has several notable ties that have been well-documented... The Fripp/Belew/Siggi/Bradley Fish connections all adhere to the wiki convention of notability if members have gone on to major notable projects...
please tell me if more sources are needed for this ? Will attempt to delete anything self-published...
--Debsuls 16:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I removed some of the self-published references and notes.
I still put forth that even without the Fripp/Belew/Siggi connection (which has to be notable and is well documented in various non-trivial sources) - member Dave Adler performs with and produces the Willy Porter band (well documented) and also the Richard Cheese/ Adler connection seemed strong. Both Cheese & Porter have gone on to international success and are wiki'd...
--Debsuls 16:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
added Gomers member Steve Burke's recording work w. Eugene Chadbourne on Killdeer Records' Country Protest Anew in 2003. Eugene is a well-known international performing artist --Debsuls 17:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
added several more reliable sources citing the band's work w. Gen Jereb (international sensory therapist) on her four albums that support challenges associated with Autism, ADHD, Learning and Behavioral Disorders, and a couple more verifiable sources to strengthen the Willy Porter cross connections. also added a reference to the Biff discography, which shows work and associations beyond the scope of the Gomers article[24]
from the article: The Gomers backed up Jen Gereb on her album for autistic & sensory-challenged children titled Cool Bananas which was released in the USA and Australia. No Worries, Say G’day and Jumpin’ Jellybeans also featured Gomers Dave Adler, Steve Burke, Gordon Ranney and Biff as instrumentalists.[25][26] --Debsuls 20:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- added Westwood One link, the largest radio company in the world, to the Dr. Demento playlist references. Hopefully this will show the non-trivial and verifiable nature of these playlists, as the Dr. Demento show is syndicated and distributed throughout the USA, USVI and other international markets, like Jamaica, via Westwood One's massive radio network.
added newfound non-trivial, verifiable and reliable evidence showing Dave Adler as keyboardist Bobby Ricotta with Richard Cheese, to whit: Dave Adler, The Gomers' music director, was pianist/keyboardist Bobby Ricotta for Richard Cheese on Lounge Against the Machine's first 2 releases Lounge Against the Machine and Tuxicity[27][28]
--Debsuls 18:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
added the Subgenius connection w. multiple non-trivial sources: Rev. Ivan Stang from the Church of the Subgenius collaberated with The Gomers on his 1999 release, Live at Starwood from the Starwood Festival on the song Pain Stain 2K. [29][30][31] The band has also appeared on the Hour Of Slack several times.[32][33][34] --Debsuls 22:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfy to User:Black Falcon/Advertising and disability (the article creator, Bhaller (talk · contribs), doesn't seem to be an active editor). —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:39Z
A personal essay: NOR. Utgard Loki 15:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:36Z
NN actor. Appeared in minor roles in a few films. No references. Does not pass WP:BIO and violates WP:BLP. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 15:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The recent expansion of the article and the addition of references clearly establish notability; comments favoring deletion were written prior to such expansion. John254 05:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A "biography" that says he wrote software and has a tattoo. That's not a biography, and he seems to be a basic professor, of which the world has many. Utgard Loki 15:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rule 3 The person has published a significant and well-known academic work: Kölling has co-written a book that has been translated into at least four languages and is the core text for the CO320 and CO520 Computer Science modules at Kent University.
Rule 5 The person is known for originating an important new concept: The object bench was the subject of Kölling's Ph.D dissertation[1] and is key feature of the heavily used BlueJ and a concept that Microsoft have now adapted.
Rule 6 The person has received a notable award or honor: Kölling has received two awards for his work as noted in his entry.
I now quote the Wikipedia:Notability (academics) page again:
"If an academic/professor meets any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, they are definitely notable."
Kölling satisfies at least three of these main points and therefore his entry should stay Tony Hunter 15:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Yuser31415 06:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable college player. Suggs was primarily a back-up quarterback for 2 different teams. It was nominated for speedy deletion, then prodded but prod was removed. Thomas.macmillan 18:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Recurring characters of Neighbours. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:35Z
DELETE There is no way known this article should exist on its own. This character is way too minor. A mention in Recurring characters of Neighbours would be enough. Kogsquinge 23:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g7, author request. NawlinWiki 23:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 09:19Z
Closing notes
There is some serious hoaxing going on here, perhaps by Duiek, or by Gillis himself.
Facts:
It's possible that:
As far as I can tell, Gillis is indeed family name with a long history rooted in Scotland. Houseofnames.com sells Gillis family plaques and such. [36] There's a book called Gillis Family in the South by Clayton Metcalf [37]. There's even a whole web forum dedicated to Gillis geneaology [38]. I'm sure they'd know about this baronetcy already if it weren't a hoax.
In the real world:
Note: I am merging the AFDs for Gillis Baronets, Sir Alexander Gillis, 3rd Baronet. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 08:32Z
This section was originally for Gillis Baronets only. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 08:32Z DELETE
The next section of comments was originally for Sir Alexander Gillis, 3rd Baronet only. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 08:32Z
DELETE
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 09:36Z
DELETE
The result was keep. Certainly no consensus exists to delete, and some of the keep arguments are strong and not well refuted. Mangojuicetalk 17:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated because there's no reason at all to list people who have had pies thrown at them. -Roofus 04:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G10 Tizio 15:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious nonsense — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killing sparrows (talk • contribs) 2007/02/27 22:52:43
The result was Merge to ECW Originals. Please discuss the final name of the merged article on Talk:ECW Originals. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:31Z
Starting. See User talk:72.225.255.18. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:29Z
I don't think the website is notable. Gnews search. --Hojimachongtalk 04:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DELETED BY DOUCHBAGS.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 09:19Z
Closing notes
There is some serious hoaxing going on here, perhaps by Duiek, or by Gillis himself.
Facts:
It's possible that:
As far as I can tell, Gillis is indeed family name with a long history rooted in Scotland. Houseofnames.com sells Gillis family plaques and such. [44] There's a book called Gillis Family in the South by Clayton Metcalf [45]. There's even a whole web forum dedicated to Gillis geneaology [46]. I'm sure they'd know about this baronetcy already if it weren't a hoax.
In the real world:
Note: I am merging the AFDs for Gillis Baronets, Sir Alexander Gillis, 3rd Baronet. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 08:32Z
This section was originally for Gillis Baronets only. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 08:32Z DELETE
The next section of comments was originally for Sir Alexander Gillis, 3rd Baronet only. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 08:32Z
DELETE
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:28Z
Incomplete nomination by IP user. No stance at this time -- saberwyn 21:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to Conversations with Other Women. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:46Z
Merge with film article Rothko65 15:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus to delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:27Z
Previously listed in a group AFD. Received some individual opinions, but the group AFD closed as delete all. Discussion at deletion review agreed that this merited individual consideration, because some of the issues are different. Please read both prior discussions before opining, this is a technical nomination by me. GRBerry 16:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:23Z
This organizations appears to fail WP:CORP. Part Deux 16:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Asian Australian. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:22Z
This article is fairly short on context: just a list of the information on the Australian census, thus failing WP:NOT#IINFO. Suggest deletion without prejudice to recreating a better article. Part Deux 16:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:42Z
Steggy and Lacy is a complete hoax. No Google hits except for the Wikipedia article. --Caldorwards4 16:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Water management. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:41Z
Original research, essay, better article with same subject matter already exists: Water resources - Ozzykhan 16:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Page does not meet notability guidelines per WP:Bio Mocko13 17:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:34Z
There is no real content here. It is just a giant linkfarm for blogs. IrishGuy talk 17:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Adam Cuerden talk 15:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable school district; no reason given why it's any different from all the others. Veinor (talk to me) 17:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My Contribs) 18:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I will create a redirect after deletion.
Original research, essay, better article with same subject matter already exists: Computer network and Telecommunication - Ozzykhan 17:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g1, patent nonsense. NawlinWiki 18:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article purports to be about a place, but contains little or not information about the town. Instead it includes information about a specific murder incident that occured there. Contains little of use. Ian Goggin 17:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete
Candidates for municipal office and city councilmembers are not notable under WP:BIO. Relevant information (his declaration of candidacy) already exists in the article on the 2007 Mayoral Election. Mocko13 17:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:27Z
Insufficient evidence of Notability --Strangerer 18:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
County council members and rumored candidates for higher office do not meet notability criteria in WP:BIO - Mocko13 18:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 10:37Z
Wasn't a single and no third-party coverage. No assertion of notability. There is no information that can't be placed on the main album page. Rehevkor 18:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 10:38Z
Wasn't a single and no third-party coverage. There is no information that can't be placed on the main album page (i.e. a summary of the story in one place would be more appropriate. Rehevkor 18:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Majorly (o rly?) 00:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Denialism: Orwellian words for the 2000's. This article opens an epistemological can of worms. This is not consistent with the purposes of Wikipedia.
I believe this whole article is simply well-disguised original research. From the Wikipedia viewpoint, the article violates the WP:NOR as well as indeirectly violating the WP:POV policies (the existence of this article would seems to amplify "anti-denialism" propaganda, closing a self-justifying loop.) Also, reliable sources do not usually include mere blogs. From a functionalist viewpoint, the problem with "denialism" as a concept, and as an encyclopedic entry, is that it promotes poisoning the well: denouncing a view as denialism or its proponent as a denialist has the effect of leading to judgement before inquiry. Using User:Quitter's own words against him:
we see this very kind of thinking. "Well-established" might mean theories which actually are demonstratable beyond reasonable doubt, or it might mean uncontested propaganda. Which is which?
The result was Merge to I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 10:37Z
Wasn't a single and no third-party coverage. There is no information that can't be placed on the main album page, possibly no notable info at all. Rehevkor 19:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:20Z
The article doesn't cite any independent reliable sources, and a somewhat thorough search via Google didn't turn up anything remotely independent. Article was written in a first-person style in December 2004, little has been updated since, and now that the group's website went down, it's not even clear that any first-person updates will occur. Interiot 19:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 10:36Z
Wasn't a single and no third-party coverage. Not notable. Seems to contain only vague, unvarified info and a description of the song. Rehevkor 19:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was: Speedily deleted - spam, no claim of notability. - Mike Rosoft 10:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just don't see the importance and the article does not assert the notability of the invention. It's possibly spam. Just because it has a patent doesn't mean it's notable. PigmanTalk to me 19:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 10:38Z
Non notable non single with only un sourced meaning and lyrics (which are not allowed according to WP:L&P). Rehevkor 19:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 10:36Z
Non-notable non-single, only contains unsourced info that could be moved to the album page if necessary. Rehevkor 19:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:19Z
Failed candidates for local office are not notable. Sorry for all the Maryland politicians in AfD today, BTW - am clearing out the category. - Mocko13 19:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by Irishguy as nonsense. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 22:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The information in this article seems to be fabricated. No additional information about the native volcanic bumble bee, Asinius-Perperus, or Mountain Smoke bug could be found with searches. Strangerer 19:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:19Z
Non-notable non-single. Contains no notable infomation/speculation. Rehevkor 19:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deletion by admin Steel359 as the article falls under the criteria of CSD A7. Non-admin closing of orphaned AFD per WP:DPR.--TBCΦtalk? 01:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This time-travelling article claims that the band had top 40 UK hits... in summer 2007. I can't find any verification of this with Google, not even when I engage the time-machine patch. FisherQueen (Talk) 19:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:18Z
Reason Delete - Appears to be spurious nonsense. Googling "Dukinization" only brings up copies of this article. Googling "Duke Kim" + composer brings up nothing relevant. MakeRocketGoNow 19:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:17Z
Not notable online community. Fails WP:WEB. Selket Talk 20:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ATT, no sources provided or could be found. Fails WP:WEB or WP:SOFTWARE, whichever you want to apply. Page makes no claim to notability and from what I can tell has little hopes of expansion. Is not included in Ubuntu, Debian or Gentoo, showing lack of notability among Linux software. BJTalk 20:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Im not quite sure how this works but here goes: We are working behind the scenes and have an active forum. Progress can be checked at http://blog.thezpanel.com/. If you have any further questions feel free to contact me at mmulla(at)zee-way.com
Regards,
Meisam Mulla
ZPanel Developer
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:16Z
Article does not establish church's notability ObtuseAngle 20:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So reference to WP:cong is still perfectly appropriate. If WP:ORG were amended to exclude all articles about congregations, that would run contrary to the observed practice in AFDs and would be inappropriate and misleading, since many article about congregations have been kept. Edison 23:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:14Z
Obscure, non-notable substub on tiny UK pressure group that seems to exist largely only as a website. Stringops 20:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Here are a list of its supporters http://www.republic.org.uk/supporters/index.php Including renowned human rights campaigner peter tatchellRepublicUK 20:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment here are some references of its notability:
http://www.labourspace.com/campaign.php?whichcampaign=71
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmpubadm/212/212we08.htm
http://www.petertatchell.net/politics/republic.htm.RepublicUK 20:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination was only made because I nominated an unoitable monarchist organisation.RepublicUK 20:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is rather remarkable that people are hurling charges such as sock puppet. This organization is a bona fide organization with dozens of supporters among political and cultural figures in British society. The BBC had given reference to it in a series of articles in 2003. Dogru144 17:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedied repost. Opabinia regalis 04:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The page offers no sources and does not assert notability of the subject.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eje Records
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:12Z
Both the author and the book are entirely unverifiable on Google. For one thing, any author who'd gotten into literary spats with Mordecai Richler and V. S. Naipaul would certainly garner at least one Google hit. Articles listed under references don't appear to actually exist, either. Most likely a hoax — and even if he does actually exist, he's still neither notable nor verifiable enough to be on Wikipedia. Delete. Bearcat 21:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that I read one of his books when I was in high school. We had a teacher who was fond of obscure Canadian writers like Alexander or O'Groussney.
The result was Merge to Chessington World of Adventures. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:11Z
This is a non-notable amusement park ride. The entire text of the article was previously in Chessington World of Adventures but has since been changed, although a merge back makes the most sense. The author is a single purpose account, and based ont he user name, has a conflict of interest. There is not external referencing for this ride to estblish notability. PROD removed without comment. Whpq 21:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability, zero Ghits for band. NawlinWiki 22:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NN War wizard90 21:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Yuser31415 06:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Notable Band/Bandcruft SERSeanCrane 21:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 17:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The majority of these are just links to a site which is subject to a DMCA takedown notice. None of these publications appears to have an article, so t he list of links is not navigational, it's a bibliography which I need to unlink per WP:C, leaving not much. Guy (Help!) 21:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:09Z
Article is unreferenced and appears to fail to meet normal notability standards (see WP:N). Also sounds like it might have been written by someone affiliated with the comic. Delete unless proper sources included. Dugwiki 21:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete - NYC JD (make a motion) 04:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax. Nonpareility 21:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:09Z
Prodded, removed without explantion or additions. Claims to be a game invented 2007. Totally non-notable. Richhoncho 22:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 07:08Z
According to IMDB, [60] she played "model" in Monkeybone and appeared as "the potential roommate" in one episode of Friends. Nothing else. Non-notable actress. IrishGuy talk 22:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. A recreate may be appropriate if notability and reliable sources can be shown, but combined with the current patent nonsense... Adam Cuerden talk 15:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Other than that this is about a person, I cannot make heads or tails out of this "article." A google result turns up nothing. Salad Days 22:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. – Steel 11:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been nominated and deleted by speedy 2 times previous under PewterReport and Pewter Report with the concern of spam advertisement.--Hu12 23:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to List of characters in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City#Love Fist (done by User:Dbam). PeaceNT 09:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As the page has been redirected to List of characters in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City#Love Fist, I withdraw my nomination. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 22:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Non-notable fictional band. This is a band in the Grand Theft Auto Series. There are no sources and the article makes little assertion of notability Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep.--Wizardman 16:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article regarding two Amazing Race competitors. I first queried the notability of the article on the 27th, suggesting that unless there were improvements made I would eventually bring this to AFD. It was prodded by Ian Spackman on the 28th as "sheer non-notable American cultural imperialism", Evrik later removed teh prod beause he felt they were notable.
To quote from my mesage on the talk page: My main problem with the article is that it is little more than a blow-by-blow account of their participation in each series of the Race - which is plainly unencyclopaedic. There is little biographical information here that is a) not on The Amazing Race 5 contestants (in fact, much of the biographical stuff is plain copy & paste from text I added to that article) or b) not suitable to merge into that article.
Please note that a similar article, Derek and Drew Riker, has already been deleted recently. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 23:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Aves
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:05Z
Does not seems to be notable Alex Bakharev 00:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. No harm done; many of us have newly-discovered algebraic identities in our younger days. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:03Z
This page consists entirely of original research. Additionally, it was created by the creator of the alleged "rule", which violates the autobiography portion of the conflict-of-interest rules. Finally, it's not notable; there are literally an infinite number of "rules" that can be derived from algebra and some basic mathematical first principles, and there's nothing special about this one. Sarcasticidealist 00:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]