The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Borderline keep consensus... Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 06:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lodger (Finnish band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about a Finnish band. No significant claims of notability, no real coverage found from independent third party sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Quickly found 2 sources to add. Also, there is indication they got U.S. distribution on at least one album via Rykodisc. I had this article watchlisted because it helped me learn that Lodger and The Lodger (band) are different bands.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 04:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per milowent.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.