The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 09:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lobster Paradox[edit]

Lobster Paradox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

1 non-wiki ghit, which isn't about this group at all. No sources offered in article. Hoax? (Contested prod.) Fabrictramp 23:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, even if not a WP:HOAX then this clearly fails WP:N. Doctorfluffy 23:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Doctorfluffy. --Malcolmxl5 23:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:N MatthewYeager 00:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Baristarim 06:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.