The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little Interpreted Language[edit]

Little Interpreted Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable programming language. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSOFT. Does not even make a credible claim of notability. ― Padenton|✉   15:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indication of notability. —Ruud 11:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, hopeless NN stub, no references. –Be..anyone (talk) 18:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.