The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 22:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LitPAC[edit]

LitPAC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I deprodded this page, and in fairness, I should take it to Afd myself because it really does seem to be a) defunct (not a reason to delete) and b) lacking in sufficient coverage or broader impact that would suggest that it ever met our notability requirements for organizations. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per my PROD rationale. Inanygivenhole (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.