The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Haaglanden[edit]

List of tallest buildings in Haaglanden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD rationale: Per a comment from RJP98 on the talk page from March 2021: "Firstly, "Haaglanden" does not officially exist as an urban area anymore (only as a safety region, which doesn't mean much). Secondly, Haaglanden was never known for its eccentrically tall buildings in the first place. It also lists only one source, which is quite dated (2014)." I can't find any fault with this argument, nor any sourcing indicating this list meets WP:NLIST/WP:GNG.

De-PROD'd with edit summary: could be recast as List of tallest buildings in The Hague

Not a finger has been lifted to actually attempt to do so, of course, and that's notwithstanding the GNG/NLIST issue requiring SIGCOV of the topic as a whole. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Lists, and Netherlands. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Checking the one English source on the article reveals that it is already a list of tallest buildings in the Hauge, which are, unsurprisingly, all in Haaglanden. It would literally take a few seconds to click "move" and write the new title, but I'm not sure we can do that now while it's on AfD. Since AfD contributors will now inevitably start complaining about notability, they should look at the sources on the Dutch article. small jars tc 09:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. List can easily be reworked to The Hague, Netherlands proper. I'm happy to do this after the AfD is over. All 4 larger cities of the Netherlands should have such a list. gidonb (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. For reasons I state in my opposition to deletion of the Syracuse New York tallest building list. Other similar ongoing AFDs (which should be opposed IMHO) include:
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Syracuse, New York
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Columbia, Missouri (2nd nomination)
  • List of tallest buildings in Sunny Isles Beach whose name hides the fact that the AFD proposes to delete tallest buildings lists of areas of more renown:
    • List of tallest buildings in North Hudson
    • List of tallest buildings in Rochester, Minnesota
    • List of tallest buildings in Camden
    • List of tallest buildings in Albany, New York
    • List of tallest buildings in Arlington, Virginia

Doncram (talk,contribs) 15:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Meets CLN/AOAL.  // Timothy :: talk  06:14, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.