The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 07:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of professional wrestling stables and tag teams[edit]

It doesn't define how long two people need to team together to be considered a "tag team" and more-or-less just reiterates what is already located in the various sub-cats of Category:Professional wrestling teams and stables. Listcruft. Nikki311 18:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki311 18:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete - isn't useful, and is basically list cruft. Pointless article. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 18:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete Useless information that doesn't belong here. Article just well, rambles on about nothing. Dusti^{talk to me} 18:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom, not useful information. ArcAngel (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep, lists and categories are not mutually exclusive. --Pixelface (talk) 19:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete-Per nom, the article is list cruft. Nothing about a tag team itself, just lists of teams, some who have teamed only once.--TrU Co -X 20:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom; Is non-notable cruft. –Cheers, L A X 20:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per nom; the article seems a bit trivial. Zenlax ^T ^C ^S 20:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak Keep I despise "professional wrestling" but a great deal of effort went into this list. I am sure it is useful to someone that is doing a doctoral thesis on some team thing in this "sport". The author should write an article at the top that explains the tag thing and what it means to us laymen. Golgofrinchian (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Amount of effort put into an article is not a reason to keep it. Also, your comment didn't need to contain your personal opinions on professional wrestling. Nikki311 01:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I apologize for my sarcastic tone of my post. Golgofrinchian (talk) 02:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Weak Delete There is an appropriate way for this list to be presented, this however is not it. Any two wrestlers who happen to be thrown together one week could theoretically make this list, which makes this list largely indiscriminate, and unmaintainable. If this list were to be culled to only reflect the pairings which are otherwise notable, (title winners, or those already with articles, and included background information as Golgofrinchian indicated, then it could probably stay. -- RoninBK _{T C} 03:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.