The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A "notable" list lacking any sort of valid reference. Only criteria for list entry is POV. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 09:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The word notable should definitely be removed from the title, regardless of the outcome of this discussion. This per the naming conventions. AecisBravado 13:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All articles are suposed to be about "notable" subjects. So this is redundant with List of guitarists. Dugwiki 18:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the List of guitarists should be only notable guitarists, this is redundant. And since 'notable' isn't defined, it's 100% open to POV. SkierRMH 22:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' What is this supposed to be? notable guitarists who are further notable for playing guitar solos? Almost all rock guitarists do solos. Keep it only if you delete "notable rock guitarists" and make a new list for notable rock rhythym guitarists. -Freekee 01:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.