The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (natter) @ 12:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of motels[edit]

List of motels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a misdirected article that doesn't serve anyone's needs. With less than 40 entries, and a title that does nothing to define it's usefulness, I can see no point in it's existence. BTW, 2 of it's entries are the exact same entity. I do not know of the policy to cite for this AfD request, but when reasonable people can agree, it is consensus and do we really need a policy? A list better served as a category, or possibly a better defined list with a more useful title? John from Idegon (talk) 07:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep - This fully qualifies for a Wikipedia article per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Motels and subcategories therein. The list also qualifies for an article per WP:LISTPURP as a functional and useful navigation aid to various Wikipedia articles. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination withdrawn - with hopes of collaboration on a more usable delineation of this subject. John from Idegon (talk) 07:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.