The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a collection of external links. The other articles listed will have to be nominated separately if at all. --Coredesat 07:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of medieval reenactment groups[edit]

List of medieval reenactment groups (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

WP:NOT#DIR; Page seems to exist primarily as a large directory of external links for these groups Masaruemoto 03:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:IS NOT A BUNCH OF LINKS. Arbustoo 05:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Arbustoo. --Charlene 05:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Very intersting, informative and useful. Dwain 15:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:INTERESTING and WP:USEFUL. Masaruemoto 20:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no possible grounds for keeping this kind of rambling indiscriminate list up. Assuming this AfD results in a delete, the closing admin may well want to take a long cold look at List of ancient reenactment groups, List of dark age reenactment groups, List of umbrella groups for reenactment, List of historical reenactment groups and most especially Comparison of historical reenactment groups as well - iridescenti (talk to me!) 17:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Categorize this should be a category for those groups substantial enough to have articles. Oh, it seems to be Category:Medieval reenactment. FrozenPurpleCube 23:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm happy with that, just think no point keeping all these lists up which duplicate the categories - iridescenti (talk to me!) 10:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I agree with Dwain. Guthroth 10:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.