The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of indian cricket team player came from under 19[edit]

List of indian cricket team player came from under 19 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pointless list. No clear inclusion criteria. International cricketers only? What about domestic? I see no point in this list whatsoever. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 18:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - can't see any encyclopedic value in this list. If by any chance it gets kept, the horribly mangled English of the title needs correcting -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unencyclopedic, ungrammatical, unnecessary. Why is this not a speedy delete? Johnlp (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:SNOW. Title is a bit of a word salad which leads to confusion as to what the article actually is about. The paragraph within is confusing, ungrammatical and unenyclopedic, which one sentence blatantly violating WP:NPOV with the claim that they play well and will do so in the future. Cyan Gardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 10:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.