The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 04:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Actually this is doubly redundant: to the abovementioned List of bird genera (which however is rather bare-bones), but also to the genus lists in the subfamily articles (Trochilinae and Phaethornithinae). (Plus there is the List of hummingbirds, which does have stand-alone utility because it allows lookup by common name.) I think we are covered here. --Elmidae (talk · contribs)
Delete As User:Elmidae notes, the article is redundant. It's also out of date and unreferenced. And List of hummingbirds, which is up to date, when sorted by binomial becomes a list of genera. Craigthebirder (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.