The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 17:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of environmental journals[edit]

List of environmental journals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete apart from trying to figure out what is an environmental journal, this is best handled by categories - note, there's only one entry here anyway. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete First, it violates WP:NOT by being an indiscriminate collection of information. Also, it only contains one item, which could even be considered POV. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Your claim that this is indiscriminate is false; it clearly selects for environmental. Also, look at WP:CLN.

• Keep I meant to put this in my userspace; sorry. I've copied it over. On second thought, we may as well keep this and work on it. it's fine by me to delete it. ImpIn | (t - c) 00:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. We have these list is many fields, and they've always been supported here. We dont delete articles because they are incomplete. There's no trouble finding criteria, such as the JCR classification. DGG (talk) 03:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I meant to title this "List of environmental health journals", which would be a subgroup of the "list of environmental journals". I think both ultimately belong. Note that DGG's point is valid -- we don't delete articles because they are incomplete.

• Redirect to List of environmental periodicals or Keep and copy journals from the List of environmental journals List of environmental periodicals to it. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Clearly there are a lot of lists related to environmental publications. It might be best to create an article called "List of environmental publications" -- from there we can point to the scholarly journals (this article), the less formal magazines (list of environmental periodicals), and some of the other lists. This article should probably be renamed to "List of scholarly environmental journals"; however, that would be a very broad list. I would even say that list of environmental websites falls under the "publication" umbrella, even if it's an unorthodox type of publication. Thoughts? ImpIn | (t - c) 03:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Agree. The best approach would be a List of environmental journals and List of environmental magazines and then List of environmental periodicals would be deleted and any miscellaneous ones placed in List of environmental publications. The latter would also point to all the other related lists. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted the "list of environmental websites" was deleted but was recreated. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per DGG. --Itub (talk) 11:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.