The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, no consensus for deletion.--JForget 23:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing here isn't already on a list or can't be made into a category DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 21:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this isn't a category, it might as well be. That there are individual articles about many of the Sonic characters is nauseating (granted, some of the blue links go to articles such as Other characters in Sonic the Hedgehog). Mandsford 00:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. I can see some little elementary school kid first learning how to use library resources being thrilled upon coming across this. It does give a complete listing and would be a shame to go to waste. Renee 13:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment How is that addressing the problems. Wikipedia doesn't keep articles just because an 11 year old might find them useful. notability and verifiability are the top priority. DurinsBane87 22:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:SAL so its a valid list. The characters are just waiting for a motivated editor to make pages for them.Viperix 00:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment And why would they make a page for any of those characters if the pages would just get deleted for being unotable, keeping the page for a list of Red links isn't a valid reason. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 12:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just re-checked and none of the links are red, in my opinion they all link to where they should go. and your right, no new pages need be made. Of course the more notable characters deserve their own pages and seem to already have them. Suggesting that none of the characters in sonic are notable would be absurd. This article still passes SAL, is encyclopedic, and (for once) not written in a in-universe style. Viperix 01:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Viperix and Renee. By the way I made the article and it has been on the board for 2 years running (plus it was my first ever edit). This list can be used for reference and a quick shortcut for users who are researching up on the characters and need an easy way to locate the articles without having to go on complicated searches. I stand by what I said and support all Keeps. Evilgidgit 13:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep I say this is a decent and useful page should someone ever want to have a quick check on all the charicters instead of going from one page to another which saves time. Behellmorph 10:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Relevant informationa nd not prone to bloating like product lists. Mbisanz 19:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.