The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of basic visual arts and design topics[edit]

This has been a mess for a very long time. Other lists linked on this page are no longer there. This is in no way a list of basic topics. There are many 'A' entries, and then it peters out. It started to be a comprehensive list of topics (which would be strange to do with such a big subject.) There may be a need to explain visual art/design basics, but that should go to improving the main Visual arts page.

Also, there only link to this page is List of basic topic lists. - Clubmarx | Talk 02:58, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It doesn't do its job anyway of helping a beginner. No guidance. Tyrenius 06:44, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Kevin 08:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 15:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Wot, no Cubism? Case proven. Delete. TheMadBaron 20:00, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Misleading title and content. --Sunfazer | Talk 10:23, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everyone above. As a side note, I'm getting tired of needing a specific piece of information and having the first half-dozen search results all be lists that would have worked equally well as categories. ergot 18:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.