The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of anthropomorphism in film[edit]

A bit too broad in coverage. Should we really list every film ever released that has featured talking animals/objects? The topic is unclear too. Do we list films on the basis of having a single anthropomorphic character, or only if they are the main characters? Enok^talk 20:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT, essentially a listing of loosely related items. The vast majority of animated films will have some measure of anthropomorphism in them, as will a great many other films. Also, as stated above, the inclusion criteria are ill-defined. Not a good list. Arkyan 21:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; There would be innumerable borderline cases clogging it up, too. Unmaintainable. A²Kafir (and...?) 21:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even with strict inclusion criteria (ie main characters), it would be a vast and hopelessly heterogeneously portion of all movies that have ever been filmed.victor falk 23:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, impossible to complete. WillOakland (talk) 23:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete List of loosely associated films; most animated films will be in this list for sure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not unlike making a list of films that have car chases, except that anthropomorphism is a story technique that existed long before film (Aesop's Fables and the Book of Genesis had "talking animals") Mandsford (talk) 02:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. RobJ1981 (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is too much subjective information in this stub. It is a 2 year old article with very little edits which suggests it is not notable either: [1] Artene50 (talk) 07:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.