The result was Keep. Numerically things are near equal, and If I were goinge purely on numbers I'd clsoe as no consensus. But the delete argemetns are a combination of WP:IDONTLIKEIT and the assertion that having a category would be better. But such lits are clearly supported by guideline pages linked by those favoring keep, and the maintenence argumetn would be stronger in the presence of evidence that maintenence had in fact failed. Cats take maintenence too, if not quite so much. DES (talk) 04:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I realize this article is tagged with ((underconstruction)), but this list is a disaster waiting to happen. "Action film" is purely OR, and the list itself will become horribly unmanageable.
I am also nominating the following related pages:
Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment The lists if allowed to be completed serve a much greater purpose than categories - they will provide an overview of specific genre and therefore become encyclopedic. ♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you?" Contribs 13:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep what are you doing? List of action films already existed for many years -the creator is taking it to the next level by formatting it into encyclopedic lists which provide information. Action as a genre is pretty defined -POV? I don't think so. PLease give these lists time to develop ♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you?" Contribs 10:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]