The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of South African footballers who played for Liverpool F.C.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trivial intersection of information/listcruft. The only thing that these players have in common is their nationality (at some point) and the club they played for (at some point). There's nothing otherwise noteworthy. MSJapan (talk) 23:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Why South African players? Why Liverpool? Entirely non-notable listcruft. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SALAT. I can hardly wait for list of one-eyed horse thieves from Montana who played for Liverpool F.C. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG, WP:LISTCRUFT amongst others. This is not something that has gained particular coverage. Wikipedia is not a place for such niche topics. Spiderone 09:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - utter LISTCRUFT. Giant Snowman 09:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - trivial intersection of no significance -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - As the author of the page I'll save you all the time and give the go ahead for the removal of the page. I see the error in my ways. For future reference though it would be appreciated if discussions such as these were done more respectfully. The creation of the page was a genuine attempt so some of the snarky remarks are somewhat insulting. -- Liam E. Bekker (talk) 12:05, 8 December 2015 (GMT)

Guilty as charged. My apologies. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.