The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ➪HiDrNick! 05:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ring of Honor events[edit]

List of Ring of Honor events (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Would be the same as listing every episode of RAW, SD or ECW, or even iMPACT. As 2-3 events are held each month this list will probably never be full of bluelinks. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Darrenhusted (talk) 10:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Not every event is notable, just because Ring of Honor is. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is great for a quick reference of event names/dates, and I have used it plenty of times for that purpose. --WolfLord718 (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC) — WolfLord718 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Keep. I must agree with Wolflord - I have used this page many times to find out when a specific event happened or what it was called. It is a good reference page and should not be deleted. (Mikeyconcon (talk) 02:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)) — Mikeyconcon (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

"I like it" isn't a valid keep reason. You do realize, there is wrestling-only sites with this same exact information? RobJ1981 (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I like it" was not my reason - I believe it to be a useful reference page. If there are other sites that have this same exact information I have not come across them. However if that is the case then deletion seems more viable I admit. Mikeyconcon (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ITSUSEFUL is not a valid argument. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Wikipedia:Lists (organized, verifiable, and discriminate list that serves as navigational tool as well). Also, a legitimate search term. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.