The result was delete. The consensus is that there is not sufficient evidence of notability, and that the fact that all the links are weblinks rather wikilinks indicates that the list does not consist of notable entries PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 02:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
1. no evidence of notability 2. Wikipedia is not a software catalogue 3.PROD was contested but these failings not addressed Widefox (talk) 09:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article's title gives a clear idea about the context of article.If you are able to search for sources, then the article does have enough context. This criteria should only be used when you have no idea what the article is about.