The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-05 10:43Z

List of Diamondtron CRTs[edit]

List of Diamondtron CRTs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Listcruft per WP:LIST. Wikipedia is not a product catalogue; and the notes section reads like advertising. Awyong J. M. Salleh 02:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.--TBCΦtalk? 03:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for listcruft, non-notable products and advertising. --RazorICE ^T/_C @ 05:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information, listcruft. Terence Ong 恭喜发财 08:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks like a product catalog. --Polaron | Talk 15:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as listcruft and per WP:NOT. Pyrospirit ^{Flames Fire} 16:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Retain - I was quite desperate to find a concise list of these no-longer-new CRTs. While looking for a good monitor for color graphics, I found that all the high-end CRTs are being phased out; information on what existed recently (now avail as refurbs) is hard to find. LH DAY 19:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment this is the user I was talking about, she replaced my comment for herself. --RazorICE 00:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not notable. --Bejnar 04:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.