The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete indiscriminate collection of information. 1 != 2 22:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of American Presbyterians[edit]

List of American Presbyterians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

An indiscriminate collection of people (WP:NOT), all are unsourced (WP:V) and some are living people (WP:BLP). "Notable" is inherently POV (WP:POV) and the list is redundant given Category:American Presbyterians. See also: List of Australian Presbyterians. violet/riga (t) 11:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This list can never be properly completed and there is no need for it--Phoenix-wiki ^{(talk · contribs)} 11:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. We have categories for tagging articles of notable people who happen to be Presbyterian. As with most lists on Wikipedia, this article is completely unnecessary when adding to a category performs the same function. =Axlq (talk) 21:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, although I think WP:N is a sufficient standard for inclusion if such a list were to persist. --Flex (talk/contribs) 03:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Who's up for linking to the other million American Presbyterians? Not me; delete as it's an indiscriminate collection of people. Per nom. Spawn Man ^{Review Me!} 11:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.