The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Bucketsofg 02:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wrestler from Liverpool. Was deleted as a prod and restored on request, so now it's here for discussion. I'm opinionless. ~ trialsanderrors 22:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep At least initially this article was probably a vanity, as the majority of edits are courtesy of Lisa Fury. However, it appears to satisfy notability requirements for professional wrestlers. Soltak | Talk 22:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No it does not satisfy the requirements. She wrestled in a few minor indy feds, and no notability claimed. TJ Spyke 22:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All Star Wrestling are not a minor indy fed. They have been running shows for well over 20 years and run a significant number of shows per month, see their calendar for information. One Night In Hackney 23:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
IF All Star Wrestling is notable (which I doubt), it's still just a minor indy fed and isn't relevent here. Every wrestler who competed for ROH (also an indy fed) isn't notable, and her article does nothing to show she isn't just another iny wrestler. TJ Spyke 00:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You don't think a promotion that has been running over 20 years, used to be on national TV (on one of the four main terrestrial channels, not cable or satellite) and runs a significant number (more than any US indy, for the record) of shows per month is notable? From my understanding of the sequence of events Paulley has said there is new information regarding her notability forthcoming, see the deletion review. In my opinion she is notable now, regardless of this. One Night In Hackney 00:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: in regards to British wrestling, Brian Dixon's All Star Promotions is very notable -- Paulley
Delete per WP:BIO and WP:COI. The organization she is part of is also borderline notable, and the promotion existing for 20 years isn't in itself an assertion of notability (particularly when that group's article is unsourced and also provides only a very weak assertion of notability). If the article on the wrestler can be sourced and cleaned up, I might change my mind. --Coredesat 01:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep she's hot and the article isn't just a vanity stub. Nardman1 15:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being hot isn't a basis on whether it should or shouldn't be deleted. She is a non notable wrestler, so an article isn't really needed of her on Wiki. Kris Classic 19:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She recently became a Destiny Girl in Italy's top promotion NWE.. making her an international starlet --- Paulley
Comment Just because she is a "Destiny Girl" doesn't make her notafiable. Kris Classic 03:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But competing internationally and appearing on TV does. which she has done while being a "Destiny Girl" -- Paulley 12:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.