- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was procedural close. An anonymous user attempted to nominate this page for deletion, but this AfD nomination page was created by User:DVdm, who does not support deletion. Anonymous users are not allowed to nominate pages for deletion, and no registered user has endorsed deletion of this page. I cleaned up the nomination formatting in order to put this procedural close into effect. Any registered editor can feel free to re-nominate the page for deletion at any time if they want to. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Lichess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See closing statement. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. wp:Primary sources can be used: "A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source." And the article does have wp:secondary sources. There is nothing commercial about Lichess, so I don't see any reason to delete the article, or even to remove neutral verifiable content from it. - DVdm (talk) 21:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Almost no notable, reliable sources that mention Lichess in complete significance, only as far as trivial novelties that could be covered as sections in CAPTCHA and Blind chess. There are no independent sources here that demand this subject its own article. Section the little that is here elsewhere, dump the rest.--76.210.190.130 (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.