The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Singularity 07:04, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Union Party[edit]

Liberty Union Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsourced since creation, tagged as such since August, 191 unique Google hits of under 3,000 total, so not a lot of hope for providing those missing sources. Looks like an interesting but not terribly important group. Guy (Help!) 16:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep - this party has a unique place in Vermont history. The article clearly needs work on sourcing (I'll try to do a bit myself soon), but in no way should it be deleted. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. I see about 20 articles that mention it in the New York Times archives, from 1970 through 2007. Wasted Time R (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.