The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let us be realist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Line of a speech. There's no sign that the speech in question passes the notability threshold and its punchline is even less notable. Note that if kept, the article should be renamed to either "let us be realists or "let us be realistic". Pichpich (talk) 22:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless the author can come up with something convincing to prove otherwise. The article is cited to a transcript of the speech itself, with no secondary proof that it is any more important than other speeches. I see no evidence it is known as "Let us be realist" either. Sionk (talk) 22:45, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article doesn't provide any reason that this speech was notable or even interesting. It seems to have been a boilerplate political speech. Jack N. Stock (talk) 23:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing convincing here. No secondary sources. Zero notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rody19901504 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sigh... From the article: "Filipinos is so realistic which it may bring us to be who are and in a creative way." Let us be realists and delete this... Lourdes 05:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.