The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo Floresvillar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see how it meets the requirements of WP:CREATIVE DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I used google.com.mx to see if I could get enough sources to get past WP:GNG without success. Perhaps a good example of WP:TOOSOON. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no significant coverage from non-primary reliable sources to indicate that the subject of this AfD is notable per WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.