- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Lee Stranahan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. Lot of coverage with refs but of other people/people/events. Journalist who became the news, but not notable news. scope_creep (talk) 20:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Primary sources all the way. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 12:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Puzzled by brevity of page, I looked at page history and saw that since this page was brought to AFD there have been been mass removals and replacements of material from page by IPs. I boldly replaced the blanked material so that editors at AFD see it when considering notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Samples of the extensive reported coverage of his career: "Lee Stranahan fired by Breitbart News after being rehired. What gives?," (2014) [1] The Daily Caller; "Why Breitbart’s Lee Stranahan Really Quit" (2013) Adweek, [2]; "Breitbart reporter booted from CAIR press conference" (2017) KESQ-TV [3] (a story about a story Stranahan wrote) He is currently being described as the "Lead Investigative Report for Breitbart News." Plus, that old film Strahanhan was part of is back in the news [4]. The more I look, the more the blanking of the page looks like some sort of POV attack on a controversial journalist for a controversial publication. And the more notability I see.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.