The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:12, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Burvine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not even remotely meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. Softlavender (talk) 10:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - First novel self-published only last year, no sign of significant coverage in independent RS. Too soon (if ever). Fyddlestix (talk) 14:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.