The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep – nomination was based on a vandalized version of the page which has been reverted. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk 19:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unclear purpose. Nem1yan (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This should have been filed under speedy deletion but I clicked the incorrect link. -Nem1yan (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.