The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus for the article to be retained. Further discussion about the article can occur on its talk page if desired. North America1000 09:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Mass[edit]

Latin Mass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant with the page Tridentine Mass. Anyone looking up "Latin Mass" will want that page, not a listicle of Masses celebrated in Latin. The fact that several liturgies may be celebrated in Latin can be briefly mentioned in Tridentine Mass (and IIRC already is); it does not merit its own article. juju (hajime! | waza) 01:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then the title is wrong; the "Latin Mass" nearly always refers to the Tridentine Mass. No one will use the term to casually refer to a Novus Ordo celebrated in Latin, they'll just call it a Novus Ordo celebrated in Latin, or use the proper name of whatever other Latin-language rite they're referring to. Anyway, this whole article could just be a section or two at the end of Tridentine Mass mentioning other Masses in Latin. It is not at all notable. juju (hajime! | waza) 19:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Latin Mass does not exclusively refer to the Tridentine Rite. There are plenty of Catholic churches that distinguish between Latin Mass (Ordinary Form) and Latin Mass (Extraordinary Form). Even if it did, AfD is not the place for this. If there is consensus that Tridentine Mass is the primary topic for Latin Mass, this page should be moved, not deleted. Bradv 19:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  17:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.