The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per information that arose since the nomination (non-admin closure) brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Alternative Music Conference (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Assuming that it's notable at this time, there's a WP:NOTNEWS problem. This is a one time conferernce that in a year from now will be forgotten. Nothing in the article suggests that the conference will have a substantial and lasting impact on Latin Alternative music. In addition, that article seems a bit too much WP:SPAMMY. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It's been going 8 years, not just one year. I've added a couple of sources for notability. The whole article is spammy but could be rewritten. --Dhartung | Talk 06:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems to me all this needed was a few refs to show independent coverage (now added), and copyediting for a more neutral tone (still needed). No reason to delete.--Michig (talk) 09:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Dhartung. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 19:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If it's been going on for 8+ years, then it's NOT WP:NOT#NEWS. (jarbarf) (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.