The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Artists Against 419. Will leave the history in place in the event anyone wants to merge any of it J04n(talk page) 13:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lad Vampire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability or importance ^{[Username Needed]} 09:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An illegal application facilitating dns attacks. No refs. Szzuk (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Artists Against 419. Some coverage of unclear reliability here but nothing much. A short mention at the artists' article seems sufficient. Regards So Why 10:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Artists Against 419. No established notability independent of the organization, and a search did not turn up any significant RS coverage focused on this software.Dialectric (talk) 12:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.