The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LAPSA[edit]

LAPSA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The article was submitted for CSD, but it claims the group committed multiple big hacks (--> notability claimed). Since none of the references are reliable (the mentioned interviews aren't published), this is not verifiable; Delete. Mgm|^(talk) 11:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverifiable by lack of reliable sources, probable pure vanity. Not sure if claiming major hacks should qualify under a group's "major accomplishments" for notability purposes, but still, doesn't appear to be any way to substantiate. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 17:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--Nothing notable or verifiable here.--J.Mundo (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no sources, fails WP:V. JohnCD (talk) 18:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.