The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KumoMTA[edit]

KumoMTA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. MarioGom (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halon_(software) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halon_(software) are fine, but this is nominated for Deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhillyer (talkcontribs) 13:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:WHATABOUTX. There are many articles in Wikipedia that might need to be deleted, but this discussion is about KumoMTA, and it will be discussed based on its own merits, regardless of any other examples you find. MarioGom (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They don't appear much better, thank you for signaling them, I'll review for possible deletion as well. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.