The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flower party■ 11:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kryptonsite and Kryptonisite[edit]

Both articles are identical. Proposed for deletion, but an anon objected. Article concerns a fansite for Smallville and is essentially unverifiable due to lack of any reliable third-party sources. The website is already linked from Smallville (TV series) and does not need its own article. Delete. Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with above. Make sure we get Kryptonisite too if this gets deleted, atm its basically the same article. --Syrthiss 14:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added it to this AfD, good catch. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree both should be deleted as per above. --Scot ^t 14:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't quite think they meet WP:WEB but they come close. ~10k alexa rank, at least one interview with the cocreator of the show [1]. kotepho 14:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seen it. That's not a third-party article about Kryptonsite, that's an interview with Al Gough. It verifies that the site exists and does interviews, and nothing else. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most fansites do not get interviews though. It might qualify as reprinting but I don't think the Hollywood North Report is notable enough. kotepho 19:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. Non-notable. Bucketsofg 15:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If these are deleted, it probably wouldn't hurt to make Kryptonsite a redirect to Kryptonite, as a one-character-off misspelling. -Colin Kimbrell 22:15, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know that redirects are cheap, but it seems implausible to me. It's neither phonetically similar nor an obvious typo (at least on a QWERTY keyboard). --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Smallville (TV series), as link to the site is already there, and this would dissuade from recreation. Proto||type 09:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.