The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Article is blatant advertising as well as completely failing to assert any real encyclopedic significance. ~ mazca ^talk 21:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kosher deluxe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Un-notable type of food. A google search only has restaurants with the name of "Kosher deluxe" therefore failing WP:GNG. Derild 49 21 ☼ 13:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Looks like a first article by a new user proposed for deletion on the day of its creation. It certainly needs work and references and may well be unencyclopedic. But is just seems too bitey to propose deleting it immediately upon creation. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 14:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was hopeful this could be rescued, but it's only become worse. In light of Dmacks note (and the subsequent actions of this new account), I am withdrawing my weak keep and now agree this should be deleted. It has morphed from what looked like a poorly written, but good faith attempt to compose a new article about a type of food into a poor article about a non-notable restaurant. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 13:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It can be moved to request section —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.217.252 (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete don't see much notability. Eeekster (talk) 08:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (A7) No assertion of notability. Just a restaurant. Heck, not even really a coherent article so much as a menu-dump? I would have already done so (and the associated ((uw-create1)) or some other pointer to WP:YFA to the creator), but since we're here already, I guess no objection to waiting a day or so to see if he comes up with anything... DMacks (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I blocked the original author as spam-only account after it repeatedly recreated a different hopeless spam article despite warnings (that included links for article guidelines and how to get started). The article being discussed here is marginally better, and I'll refrain from speedying it because of an existing "keep" !vote. DMacks (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Notability not asserted; heck, the article is barely even prose, just a list of menu items. Any article which concludes with "made fresh on premises enjoy your meal have a deluxe day" ought to be outta here soonest. --MelanieN (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.