The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 12:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KolibriOS[edit]

KolibriOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Notability to come. Chealer 20:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only OS that can be installed on the same NTFS disk with Windows without modifying Window's bootsector. Even linux doesn't support this option! There is not many graphical OS'es that written in assembler also. 193.232.113.222 09:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Chealer, but also because this is spam created to link to vendor's website. --Gavin Collins 18:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since the OS is under GPL, I don't know if terms like "spam" and "vendor" should apply. I am not going to !vote at this time, but I am more sympathetic to keeping an article about an OS than about a distro of an OS. So far, though, I don't see the sources. --Groggy Dice T | C 02:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GPL != noncommercial. There are many for-profit GPL'd products out there. —Psychonaut 18:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but I really don't think a group of programmers coding a new OS in assembly are expecting it to become a raging moneymaker. I get the point, though, GPL software is not automatically non-commercial, just as obscure software with a WP page != spamming vendor. --Groggy Dice T | C 21:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence of notability. —Psychonaut 18:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it isnt notable yet. See coLinux for a linux that can boot from a windows ntfs disk. John Vandenberg 22:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.