The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, "blatant and obvious misinformation" i.e. G3 fits nicely. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 12:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting read!. I'd suggest either redirecting it to Koala as a typo or tagging it as vandalism per WP:CSD#G3. ~ Eóin (talk) 02:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious hoax. No such beast exists. -- Mattinbgn\talk 10:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as complete bollocks - better quality than most wikipedia hoaxes though - Peripitus(Talk) 12:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.