The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep—fairly obvious reasons, including many independent reliable news sources. — Deckiller 22:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kobe Bryant sexual assault case[edit]

Kobe Bryant sexual assault case (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is about the Kobe Bryant's sexual assault case in 2003. David Pro 22:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep, nom hasn't really given a reason for deletion. Was a notable case, has decent sources, too long to merge back into Kobe Bryant. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 22:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• speedy keep, the nominator seems confused.-67.85.180.72 22:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and get the WP:SNOW shovel. Clearly passes any possible test of notability. Otto4711 22:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.