The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 02:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Knomo[edit]

Knomo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability - would need to be completely rewritten to meet wikipedia standards and has no reliable sources. Reichsfürst (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:CORP. All coverage is blogs. FuFoFuEd (talk) 06:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The page creator and sole editor has been blocked 'because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website'. Reichsfürst (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wikipedia guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 22:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.