The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 15:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Klokshopkids.com[edit]

Klokshopkids.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not meet our criteria for notable websites. No independent, published sources are provided, so there is no way to verify the contents of the article. Appears to be self-promotion by someone associated with the site. Proposed delteion notice removed without comment, so bringing here for discussion Gwernol 07:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for reasons provided --Enric Naval (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, concur, and note also the presence of strongly non-neutral language: each story is a wonderful adventure that you wouldn’t want your child to miss. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:WEB, prod removed, never asserts notability, no sources to prove notability Doc Strange^{Telepathic Messages}_{Strange Frequencies} 16:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Bardcom (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.