The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 06:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kinyumba Mutakabbir[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR upcoming a case of WP:TOOSOON .Paid article created by a socking paid editor Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cada mori and The subject's notability is in question, as the majority of the sources cited lack any depth, only mention the subject in passing, or are user-generated content. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sources: [1][2] WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zane's The Jump Off. While there is one article that supports GNG notability, the RS status is debatable and that's the only maybe-RS available. There are social media sites, passing mentions, PR announcements, and other non-independent sources but nothing that supports WP:NACTOR and one article is not enough on its own for GNG notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see my comment? Thanks, WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, @WikiOriginal-9:, I did. They were two articles that covered him as a high-school athlete. Since they have no bearing on the article's claims nor on notability, they do not help the case for "keep".

Just for the record, they are from when he was playing college football. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Paid and it fails GNG? 190.10.8.116 (talk) 00:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete mainly because we need to be vigilant in upholding our rules for editing. Also because there is just no sign that Mutakabbir is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.