The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No point in letting this drag on. Practically an A7 speedy, the team can never fulfil the criteria for inclusion. Black Kite 09:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kettering nomads fc[edit]

Amateur football team that has never competed in the top 10 levels of the English football league system or in a national cup competition, which is the rule of thumb normally applied by the WP:FOOTY project. No sources found either. ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Don't have anything to add to the nom. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 22:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 00:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. — neuro^(talk) 09:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Amusing to see all these "per nom" comments here :) But there is nothing more to add really, besides a link to WP:ATHLETE. NW's Public Sock (talk) 21:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- .....except that WP:ATHLETE covers individual players, not clubs -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.