The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (yak) @ 12:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keri Wong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NTENNIS. Two sources are cited, and they indicate that she has not competed in a WTA main draw, and her ITF prize was less than $50,000. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines states a player as notable if:

The player has competed in the main draw in one of these higher level professional tournaments: Women: WTA Tour tournaments (the WTA Premier, the WTA International, or the WTA Tour Championships)

And states that it applies equally to singles and doubles players. She has played the 2014 Citi Open which is a WTA International event. Keroks (talk) 06:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose @Magnolia677: it appears that you have overlooked the 2014 Citi Open, as Keroks has pointed out. Wong made her debut appearance there on the WTA Tour just recently which means she is notable per project standards. Here is the drawsheet of said tournament. Jared Preston (talk) 07:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw this nomination. I'll add that info to her references on the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. And thanks! Jared Preston (talk) 11:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.